126 points

Wasn’t the 100 tampons thing because they didn’t know how weightlessness would affect bleeding?

permalink
report
reply
220 points

That and NASA is a very safety conscious organization. So they want to overestimate everything and include way more than they need. So when she said a couple per day you can round that to 5 for safety, then considering it’s a 6 day mission they want to include triple the amount of needed supplies which means 18 days worth. 18*5=90 which is pretty close to 100 so let’s round up again. Plus tampons are a useful first aid tool, especially in zero gravity. You shove some into an open wound and it’ll prevent blood from spilling all over the very sensitive equipment. Does a woman need 100 tampons for 6 days? Of course not, but she wasn’t going to spend a week in the mountains, she was going to space, so the safety precautions were much more stringent

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

It’s also a weight thing. Tampons are pretty light, it’s like one hundred per pound, so they probably said “we can budget x pounds for this” and didn’t think much about the reasoning behind why they’re sending several hundred tampons into space, but we’re entirely focused on how.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Less than that I think, and I’d suspect NASA would do load calculations in metric.

According to this reputable (first result on Google) High School Science Fair Project ^PDF, the average tampon is about 1g. I wouldn’t be surprised if they just budgeted 100g for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There’s also the point that they don’t go bad. It might be easier to send a load up now, that try and fit enough for each female astronaut into every flight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Just a word of advice, the tampon in a wound thing, as much as the Russian military might advise it, is not good medical technique. Do not use a tampon to plug a wound. It’ll likely do more harm than good. Just apply pressure to it from the outside with your hand if you have literally no other option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Agree in general. The problem would be debris trapping, fluid compartmenting, sterility, etc.

But if you need a dressing and that’s all you have, unpacking them into gauze pad like things would be great.

All of this assuming you are literally flying 7.5km/s towards a trauma center

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Can the same be said about doing that in zero gravity with specialised sensitive equipment all around you that are essentially keeping you alive?

I’ll take an infection over crashing down in the ISS any day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I learned recently that in space you might not need to piss as the piss floats in your bladder.

normally you get 3/4s full and really need a slash, but in space it can fill up totally without you feeling anything and then just bust out your urethra without notice.

honestly, it was probably a fair point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Your bladder changes volume to hold urine; there’s no floating, just pressure. Gravity affects that pressure though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

NASA also does everything they can to save weight though.

On later Apollo missions, they cut the number of band-aids in the lunar lander’s first aid kit from 6 to 12 to save weight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Doubled the bandaids to save weight. I can see why the tampon thing was a struggle for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

they cut the number of band-aids in the lunar lander’s first aid kit from 6 to 12 to save weight.

I see here is the problem. The guy doesn’t know how to reduce weight, you don’t add more stuff to cut on weight. That explains the extra tampons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Not that I disagree that NASA isn’t safety conscious, but I’ve recently watched a video about the challenge disaster which seemingly could easily have been avoided if they had listened to the weather concerns or redesigned their solid boosters after issues were observed in the first place. I guess in that case they just got too complacent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That decision was made on a different level, though, and was largely political.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Every policy is written in blood.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I thought you were going to say adjust their tampon supply estimates and then something about mankind and hell in a cell…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My mom makes similar calculations for holiday dinners.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

NASA is obsessed with redundancy, especially when the weight allowance lets them run away with it.

Add that to the fact that most of the engineers were men, and had literally no clue about how many tampons are needed for a normal woman on earth, and you end up with 100 being sent up for a two-week mission.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-46 points

LMAO TWO-WEEK also they could just fucking asked

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

Apparently someone did, and then the response was that tampons are low enough weight that the packaging to send them was the majority of the weight, even when sending 100, so they sent 100.

They also developed a zero-g makeup kit because they thought that female astronauts would want that. It had eyeliner, lip gloss, foundation, and blush. All specially selected to not generate dust.

The makeup kit never actually flew, likely because someone asked an actual woman if she would ever want that shit in space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

They did ask. The source for the claim is Sally Ride talking about the time NASA asked if 100 sounds like the right number.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Smooth comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They did. That’s why they didn’t send that many. It’s not like it took them a long time to figure what the worst case number would be that fit in the budget.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Do people really use the term “hosting” when saying you’re having someone over for the weekend? Because I’m getting sex worker vibes otherwise.

permalink
report
reply
50 points
*

Sure. In my mind, hosting is either for larger get-together that takes organizing and preparation or if someone is traveling to the area to stay with you for a few days.

Hosting generally carries the weight of planning, organization and preparation that probably doesn’t go into just having someone over to hang out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Depends how grown-up we’re trying to feel

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Been using that forever, even in the internet. Ever heard of LAN hosting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Is that the original cybering?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

hey asl do u lan?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s fucking the LAN port right?

Do you pay it or does it pay you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I don’t hear it often, but being a host to people in your house is a normal thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I feel like we’re missing an important piece of the puzzle: are they an alcoholic?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Anyone who drinks more than a few times a week in the US is likely an alcoholic. Put someone in the hospital and have them discuss their usage with nurses over a variety of days… you will get quotes like (1-2 per week and 1-2 per day out of the same person) then you will have a nurse ask what their weekend drinking looks like and they will say “around a six pack”

Just my observations, maybe I work in a depressed part of the state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
8 points

Fuck it’s actually real. Nasa engineers really suggested 100 tampons for 6 days

https://www.poynter.org/tfcn/2021/did-nasa-send-a-woman-to-space-with-100-tampons/

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

What would be the normal amount, just out of interest?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I’d say 4 tampons a day for 7 days (so 28) would be plenty for most people. If you need 100, I’m concerned you would be dead of blood loss.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yup.
Quick math and being paranoid about redundancy:
A typical period lasts 3-5 days, with 7 being the high end. Round to 10.
Heavy flow might require a change every 4 hours, or 6 a day. 12 a day is in the realm of reality, albeit medically concerning.
Bring extra in case return has to be delayed for whatever reason.
They’re extremely light and small, so a conservative weight allowance holds a lot of them. About 1g each, or 100 per 4oz.

So some quick math and padding your numbers to account for the unknown gets you 100, which considering they then asked isn’t an unreasonable way to start.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Breweries already did the math for us - 1 case per dude.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Per day

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How much is a case?
Over here, beer is typically sold in crates of 20 bottles à 0.5l.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Interesting. Where I live the standard case size is 24*0.3L.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Here it’s usually 24 cans of 0.33l. I haven’t seen a crate of bottles in years

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 871

    Posts

  • 41K

    Comments