Sen. Ted Cruz has introduced a bill that would limit the use of preferred names by trans people.
The irony, critics point out? The senator, whose legal name is Rafael Edward Cruz, uses a preferred name himself: Ted.

248 points

Wow, now THAT will solve most of our country’s problems, right, y’all? Fucking piece of shit useless mother fucker. I hate his weasly voice.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

He’s the kinda guy that leaves his tube socks on and pulls his pecker out of his whitey tighties before fucking his wife with the lights off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

This imagery just burns right though my soul and it won’t go away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It hurts me

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Glad to be of service 😌 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Correction, he’s the kind of lizard that eats a rat while the humans aren’t looking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I imagined this in a motel and the car lights in the parking lot are rolling by. I hate it

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

out of his skidmarked whitey tighties

FTFY. Just wanted to complete the scene.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

The majority of people who support and parrot shit like this aren’t even doing it because they think it’s somehow good for the country, they just think it’s something that needs to be fixed because some ignorant piece of shit on FOX News or the like told them it was bad, and we should all be mad about it.

I can’t imagine being so fucking bored and miserable with my life, that the sheer THOUGHT of someone else being happy and comfortable… or even just not sad and miserable in their own life, that I’d feel obligated to dedicate what precious time I have on this earth to ruining everything for everyone.

I agree with you - Ted Cruz is an absolute piece of shit, but the people who feel driven to support these types of policies and bills etc. are truly vile human beings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

*Rafael Cruz

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Am loving the energy in this post! It’s so tiring that this shit is what passes for politics around here. Like half’ the fucking country seriously thinks kicking us is a worthy focus for the whole damn government? Really? REALLY? Let’s just stop and have a vote on how much we all hate those people for existing! That’ll make something better, won’t it? … Now here I am getting worked up too. Bleh. Of course those people have no concept of “better,” only hurting people they hate.

“I hate his voice” tacked onto the end there is kinda hilarious though 🤣

Also the initialism for the act’s name is SHSA which reminds me that “SHSR” is the IBM->HAL thing (letter-position-decrement?) for “TITS.” So I guess this bill is about TITB? … Nevermind, I’ll show myself out :P

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Him eating his booger on the debate stage still makes me gag uncontrollably if I see the clip, and if it pops into my head sometimes I’ll start gagging, which is pretty much every time I see his name

There are very few things that make me gag in disgust, this one gets me every time

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

@diannetea@lemmy.world you probably don’t need to be warned not to click this link, but for anyone else’s morbid curiosity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CgcGQYWns4

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fucking nasty ass mother fucker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Just the memory that you just summoned made me audibly gag when I read your comment. So thanks?

Ted Cruz is so gross.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Oh, just his weasley voice? Not his weasley everything else?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

He gets on my fucking nerves when he talks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

How about when you look at him? Or anything or everything else he does?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Cruz is in the business of exacerbating problems, not solving them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How do you feel about his punchable yokel face?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Violence is not the answer! But it does make me feel a lot better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I want to smash a shit pie on his face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
208 points

conservatives pick the weirdest most inconsequential hills to shit their pants on

permalink
report
reply
84 points
*

Step 1: Pick an issue that is divisive*

Step 2: Boost it with stories about how bad the people on the wrong side are: won’t someone think of the children?

Step 3: Watch the outrage donations roll on in

It’s a playbook as old as time.

*Some people might call it divisive because one side is like “let’s all become crabs and live in the ocean” vs the other side that’s like “no let’s continue using our opposable thumbs”. But who am I to label whether one side is right and the other wrong?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Look, we don’t get to choose if we want to be crab people, nature has just forced crab evolution on us

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh great, the crab-apologists have showed up

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

crabification, dude

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You have it wrong, It’s Gods will that we become crab people - it was ordained from the start of time

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Look, I don’t care what you do in the privacy of your own bathtub, but other people have to use the ocean and I don’t want you putting any funny ideas in my kid’s head about being a crab. His chitinous exoskeleton and claw are just a phase.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Your kid will be fine once he molts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Step 3 is missing the part “and ignore actual issues that affect us all but solutions would make rich people less rich so it’s better to distract them”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think it is due to it not really being any loss for them if they fail to get something like that passed. It serves the purpose of the cheap “pops” of “sticking it to them libs”, and if it passes then that is just a bonus. The whole point is like so many really stupid laws that “look/feel” like something was done but actually just wasted time or makes things just more annoying. So they are “seen” to be “fighting” the other team. Where as if they were to actually push something that requires real functional effort or could lead to massive loss of seats. They would then be seen as big losers and seen as the ego trippers that they really are. It is honestly shit that should just lead to them being put against a wall for all the intentional fucking around they are doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
105 points

So he’s going to start going by Rafael now right?

permalink
report
reply
41 points

Either that or Fled Cruise. Either way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

TEDx Cruz.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

Assigned

Rafael

At

Birth

My god…

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

Everyone should start calling Cruz “she”/“her” and when she complains, tell her she’s not allowed to use her preferred pronouns.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

This is not a good thing.

  1. It shows people it’s okay to misgender someone you don’t like

  2. It won’t feel bad for him. For him it’s a joke that doesn’t do any harm. For trans people getting misgendered is life and can deeply hurt

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It also semi consciously feeds into the misogynistic trope of calling/implying that men are feminine as an insult. It’s just a bad look all around

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

It’s not as a joke, I’m serious. The implication is that he’s a trans-man and should have to prove otherwise to every individual he meets if he wants to use his preferred pronouns. Let Cruz eat his own dog food.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Better to keep referring to he/him by he/his preferred pronouns, but just hammer in the point that he/him is using pronouns you keep saying both every time.

He/him being reminded of it every time is much worse, and doesn’t invalidate trans peoples pronouns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

No, call him by his first name at all times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think gender neutral pronouns is a better option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I think “it” is a better pronoun for Cruz - or maybe “It” given the whole evil clown thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Some who aren’t monsters go by “it” <.< I kinda want to, even, but understand that it’s pretty offensive from/for most critters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Raises its hand

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

Wait until they hear what Nikki Haley’s real name is.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Well? Don’t leave me hanging.

I’m much too lazy to type her name into Google. But I’m just un-lazy enough to ask you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Nimrata

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Fucking WHAT?! Wow.

Ok. I won’t make jokes about someone’s name. I’ll leave that to Trump and conservatives at large who judge people based on 2nd grader standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nimarata*, according to Wikipedia

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You’ve got to be kidding me

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 427K

    Comments