14 points

People here seem unaware that there exists a 3rd option that isn’t either gas or induction - a ceramic hob is electric, heated coils under glass, but you can use it with any pot or pan, so there’s no need to spend all that extra money replacing all your cookware, and the hob itself is cheaper too.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

And they’re terrible at cooking: any change in temperature, including heating up takes a ton.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They’ve served me perfectly well for over a decade.
The difference in supposed quality wouldn’t be noticeable to most while the difference in cost definitely would be. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How much do you pay for electricity?

Because with an induction stove you’ll be paying 30% less in cooking costs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I like my 2012 electric stove. I don’t notice any difference in cooking experience when I use my parents’ gas stove at their place, except the flames require more aggressive ventilation

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not unaware, just not mentioning it as an option because it’s so inferior.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I got an induction system yesterday and ripped my old ceramic one out. I mean, it worked okay apart from the fact that it was slower and would take a while to cool down again.

What always bothered me was not always having the ideally sized one and seeing all the red glow around the bottom of the pot or pan. “Fuck, I’m wasting 30 % energy right now…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

this is why big gas is cranking up the propaganda on stoves. induction stoves are better, don’t believe them

permalink
report
reply

I didn’t have a gas stove until I was in my late 40’s. I will not willingly go back to conventional electric. Gas stoves are better. Finer control, faster temp changes (esp. when decreasing).

I’d be willing to try an induction stove. They’re rare in the US, but my limited experience with them was positive. Not quite as nice as a gas stove, but miles better than an conventional electric range, and good enough that the easier cleaning would tip me over.

You mention propeganda; it’s odd that the only propeganda I encounter is the anti-gas kind. It’s non-stop on NPR and social media. I haven’t heard or read a single pro-gas piece.

Edit: I think you were only talking about induction, so I changed some phrasing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This here shows where the propaganda appears:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hX2aZUav-54

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

GF was a professional cook for 15 years, still prefers our induction stove to the gas stoves she worked on all this time.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah, I can believe I could learn to prefer induction. They’re just incredibly rare in residential US homes, which is where I live, and what the article was about.

The only place I’ve encountered an induction stove was in the EU, where - I gather - they’re more common.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

I haven’t heard or read a single pro-gas piece.

Right-wing media apparently. Not American, but from what I gather if you watch NPR, you’re a communist and a homosexual. So that means you won’t be watching real American media like Fox News.

Stuff like this from a member of congress:

“I’ll NEVER give up my gas stove. If the maniacs in the White House come for my stove, they can pry it from my cold dead hands. COME AND TAKE IT!!”

https://twitter.com/RonnyJacksonTX/status/1612839703018934274?t=ptxUxaAhqE1ax8FwY15cyA

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Idk why “watch NPR” is so funny to me right now lmao

I’m so sleep deprived

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

from what I gather if you watch NPR, you’re a communist and a homosexual.

Cmon, I’m not impressed by your knowledge. This is written in the first paragraph of the constitution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Gas stoves are better. Finer control, faster temp changes (esp. when decreasing).

Gas stoves are better in some ways, but “finer control” is debatable. If you turn the knob from 0 to 10, it’s obvious that the energy output is non-linear. On my stove the flame has like 50% of its increase between level 2 and 3 or 4. You also have a more narrow range of heat with gas. That is, the lowest setting has to be high enough that the flame does not blow out, so the min heat is higher than the min level on electric. Electric also gets hotter than gas on the high end.

With electric you get precise control. Power level 5 gives exactly half the heat energy that 10 gives; power level 6 is exactly triple the heat of power level 2. You don’t get that precision with gas. You can only eye-ball it which means harder to get reproduceable results.

You probably meant to say gas gives you /immediate/ control. Conventional electric is quite slow, but induction is fast.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Maybe it’s a brand or quality difference; I can pretty finely control the flame on our range.

“Control” is the ability to adjust to a desired temp with fine accuracy, right? I can see the flame, and observe changes more rapidly, with gas. Isn’t this finer-grained control?

A common residential electric range outputs a max 7,000 BTUs. A common gas stove outputs max 18,000 BTUs. Electric stoves are not hotter on the high end.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why are they better?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

They don’t require an explosive to be pumped into your house.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s not really the type of information I was looking for, but thanks anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

no open flame

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Instantaneous control over temperature without the safety issues of gas

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Better air quality, otherwise they are merely not as inconvenient as other types of electric stoves.

But you need to buy new induction capable pots for them and the pulsing heat they make takes some time to get used to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m still using my old cast iron cookware.

The pots that did need replacing when I went from coils to induction were a set of very cheap stainless steel ones that I bought when I was a student.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s mainly an issue with aluminum and stainless steel, but only some types of stainless steel. It’s a good stuff that I have all works flawlessly on the induction.

If you buy the aluminum Japanese cookware, they are all designed for induction anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You don’t necessarily need to buy new pots as the ones you have might as well already be ferrous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

AFIAK they also work with cast iron cookware.

permalink
report
parent
reply

While I don’t agree they’re better, a key feature over conventional electric (and one of the main benefits of gas) is that the stove surface doesn’t inherently retain heat. They get hot, but only because the pan is hot. When you turn down the heat, it’s immediate, like a gas stove.

I don’t know about how fast they can heat; gas can output a ridiculous amount of BTUs, but at 240v I wouldn’t be surprised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t know about the US, but in Germany it’s common that the individual or two plates of the induction stoves have their own 380V cable and breaker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Have to keep efficiency in mind as well. Practically all of the heat produced by induction goes directly into the pan bottom. With gas, quite a bit of the heat doesn’t end up in the pan.

In my experience, induction on high settings heats much faster than gas. Sometimes faster than is desirable actually. A pot of water will boil at the bottom when the top is only somewhat warm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

In addition to the other comments about it being just as quick, if not faster and easier to get a consistent heat, I also found the noise level was way better - it’ll hum if the pan isn’t centered properly, and the power is turned up, but when simmering, it’s pretty much silent which was weird but suprisingly nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Safer, cheaper, cleaner.

Safer being no indoor air pollution and to cook surface doesn’t get hot at all. You can literally put a piece of paper between the pan and the cooktop and it will cook without burning the paper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Pollution and home safety aside. I found it nice to pinpoint my desired heat. It works so fast and accurate that I got consistent pancakes like i never used to before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

That’s pretty cool. Can they heat a pan as fast as a gas stove? One of the major inconveniences with an electric stove is having to wait for the burner to heat up, before you can wait for your pan to heat up. I’ve had resistive stoves for decades now, and they’re not very good IMO. But I’ve never had an induction stove. I’ve really missed the gas stove we had when I was a kid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

It’s the oven, not the stovetops, where gas is most useful.

Gas ovens give moist heat which is good for baking moist foods like cakes. Electric ovens give dry heat which is good for foods that should be crispy (pizza crust). Ideally an oven would offer both kinds of fuels. Europe lacks in this regard (no thermostatic gas ovens anymore!).

Energy efficiency aside, the stovetop debate is somewhat silly in comparison because you can cook anything on either stove and adapt to the control.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

My electric oven has some sort of steam-bake option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I started baking bread during the pandemic and bought a spray bottle and filled it water.

Does the trick for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wouldn’t it be far more ideal for the electric oven to have a way of introducing moisture instead of requiring all the components for a separate fuel source?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

A simpler design is an advantage in itself but it doesn’t cover all factors (e.g. pricing).

If your closest power plant burns fossil fuels, then there’s a big inefficiency at the power plant which still has the emissions followed by a considerable inefficiency in the transmission of electricity and still some heat loss from the wall to the food in converting electric back to heat. Electric heat is more efficient if you only measure from the wall to the food. It’s overall less efficient because you have fuel → heat → steam → turbine → electricity → transmission → heat conversion (lossy at every step), when you could simply have fuel → transmission → heat. And as a consequence electric is usually more costly. Exceptionally, some regions manipulate the energy pricing in order to make electric nearly as economical as gas.

So whether gas makes economical sense depends on where you are. The prices can also swing especially in Europe due to the Russian war. Thus having both options is ideal once you consider pricing (esp. fluctuating pricing). Having both options hedges against price swings and at the same time gives you the option to choose the kind of heat you need for what you’re preparing.

power outages

Some folks live out in the sticks and have frequent power losses. Every storm is likely to cause a power outage in some remote areas where the power lines are near trees. And because those communities are small, response time is slow. So the power can be out for days. Several times this happened to someone in my family when they had a cake in their electric oven. The cake would have been ruined had they not had the option to transfer the cake to a propane gas grill.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It does. Stick a pan with water in it in the oven with your baked item. This is necessary even for gas ovens, if you require a moist cooking chamber.

The air inside a gas oven isn’t especially wet at 400°F, because of the inverse relationship of temperature and relative humidity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Seems like you could just add some water to the oven and get the best of both worlds from an electric oven in that case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
2 points

Induction only drawback is the need for more expensive cookware.

For me, induction and cast iron is a match made in heaven.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

For me pretty much everything but the china special supports induction. The only stuff I have that I can’t use with it is either old (20+ years) or was the cheapest option in the store and it’s generally not too good (a student needs to start somewhere)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Aluminum is stupid popular in my country, being cheap, affordable and pretty resistant. Most people resist moving to induction as it will require purchasing new pots and pans.

A stainless steel 25cm frying pan, of good make can cost anywhere from €35 to €70. If not more. I’m keeping on the affordable range, not crazy designer stuff.

The equivalent aluminum can cost between €10 and €20.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean you can get a good lodge cast iron pan for like $25, so it’s not really even that expensive. Sure the fancy ones are $100-200, but (don’t tell the cast iron fanatics) they’re only marginally better than lodge, and mostly because of things like aesthetics, ergonomics & weight than cooking performance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Cast iron is expensive. Between the material itself and the late hype for this particular type of kitchenware, price are high.

I bought my first cast iron pot for €45. It’s a 4 litre, so not that big.

I recently bought in a promotion a skillet and grill for €40, as a promotion, but each piece should have cost of around €40/piece. Most won’t fork that much.

Right now, I’m thinking about a nice paella or mushroom ragu to really break in the skillet.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 6K

    Posts

  • 28K

    Comments

Community moderators