New York’s governor vetoed a bill days before Christmas that would have banned noncompete agreements, which restrict workers’ ability to leave their job for a role with a rival business.

Gov. Kathy Hochul, who said she tried to work with the Legislature on a “reasonable compromise” this year, called the bill “a one-size-fits-all-approach” for New York companies legitimately trying to retain top talent.

“I continue to recognize the urgent need to restrict non-compete agreements for middle-class and low-wage workers, and am open to future legislation that achieves the right balance,” she wrote in a veto letter released Saturday.

The veto is a blow to labor groups, who have long argued that the agreements hurt workers and stifle economic growth. The Federal Trade Commission had also sent a letter to Hochul in November, urging her to sign the bill and saying that the agreements can harm innovation and prevent new businesses from forming in the state.

125 points
*

Cute how she’s being likely being paid under the table by some lobbyists that benefits from said non-compete agreements. And even if not under the table, it’s likely under the form of campain contributions, etc. Politics and capitalism mixed together brings the worst in both.

Nobody in their right mind would elect to veto something giving more rights to the working class without having some personal interests on the line.

permalink
report
reply
-68 points

You have a source for that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points
*

Hence the reason why I chose the likely being paid qualifier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-60 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-48 points

“I’m just asking questions!”

If you don’t understand the power that words hold then maybe don’t use them with such conviction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
-26 points

I understand what lobbying is, but thank you for the info. This doesn’t relate specifically to this person, though. OP says they are likely taking money and i asked for a reason to suspect this person in particular unless the argument is just “they all do it” in which case it wouldn’t be “likely”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

deez

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

From this photo, this woman looks like the baddie from Men In Black 2.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

That would be a huge compliment to this lady. Wasn’t the MIB2 villain played by Lara Flynn Boyle?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Non-competes for top tier jobs make sense, as the company invested a lot of money into the person and it wouldn’t be fair to have them poached for no cost by a rival. All tech companies make software engineers sign non-competes.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

as the company invested a lot of money into the person and it wouldn’t be fair to have them poached for no cost by a rival.

They are employees, not indentured servants.

The financial risk should be on the corporation, and not on the employee. Corporations are the ones that are going to make the most money, between the two.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d argue that big tech doesn’t invest in its workers because they look for top-tier candidates already. Also, it is way too easy for companies to abuse non-competes. People shouldn’t be forced out of their industry because they left a bad employer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

All software engineers do NOT sign non-competes. I’ve been in the field for 25 years…closest I ever signed was a NDA

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

So what else was in the bill that got it vetoed? They always hide some egregious nonsense in bills like this so if it gets vetoed they can point the finger and create outrage.

permalink
report
reply
11 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

/u/Lev_Astov@Lemmy.world didn’t even make it to the third paragraph of the article, I don’t think that they’ll read the bill.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thanks for the link. That’s worse than I thought, then. Wow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

She states it in the article. She believes companies have a “right” to retain high end labor. This bill just straight up bans non compete agreements which would make it harder to retain well trained, experienced, professionals.

That said. Why in the fuck love did we ever decide it was okay to threaten someone’s livelihood for leaving a job? I don’t care how highly trained you are. Non competes are anti-competitive in nature. They should have never been allowed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nothing just money paying a governor for her veto

permalink
report
parent
reply
93 points

You picked the wrong side, Governor.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 521K

    Comments