Buses come from a road and then go back to the same road, so this line of reasoning makes no sense.

“…scholars consider Buddhism one of the major world religions.”

“Sikhism, [a] religion and philosophy…”

“Hinduism (/ˈhɪnduˌɪzəm/)[1][2] is an Indian religion or dharma…”

Your own sources say that all 3 are religions.

Your ignorance is genuinely louder. All of those are religions, and any credible source you find will agree with me.

All the examples I provided are religions.

Trump speaking out is a fair point, but there are plenty of cases where Trump has said one thing and done the exact opposite. Trump is heavily influenced by the people around him, and Project 2025 involves the recruitment of advisors so that a president would be ready on day 1. Even if Trump doesn’t like the policies in there right now, there is no doubt that he’ll get there one day, especially since he really does not know what he’s doing.

Secondly, the immunity ruling absolutely has changed a lot. I suggest watching LegalEagle’s perspective on it.

Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism are some, but Asia has many more religions/ideologies.

Trump literally made abortion illegal in about half of the US. Even ignoring that, our lives barely change because many of the institutions that the executive branch controls have employees who aren’t appointed and stick around between administrations. Well-funded conservatives made a plan (Project 2025) to reclassify those employees so they could be replaced with Trump loyalists. Considering that this affects agencies like the FDA, NOAA, and FTC, this will definitely impact normal people who rely on prescriptions being available or weather forecasts to know about storms.

He didn’t know what he was doing for much of his first term. For his second, he’ll have an instruction booklet that he just needs to follow and take credit for. Project 2025 and the recent SCOTUS immunity ruling are just 2 signs that show that a 2nd term will be so much worse.

It’s probably the latter.

“Delivering shareholder value” has destroyed numerous companies, and I doubt it’ll stop soon.

Their point is that there’s more than 1 widely-practiced religion, and there are plenty of sects that are tolerant to different forms of self-expression. Saying food is bad because you don’t like bananas isn’t sound logic, and applying that same logic to religion doesn’t work either.

I can’t speak for any Christians, but many of the religious people I know are some of the most tolerant people I know because their religious schools focused on doing things with good intent.