13 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump was threatened with expulsion from his Manhattan civil trial Wednesday after he repeatedly ignored a warning to keep quiet while writer E. Jean Carroll testified that he shattered her reputation after she accused him of sexual abuse.

Earlier, without the jury in the courtroom, Trump could be seen slamming his hand on the defense table and uttering the word, “man,” when the judge again refused his lawyer’s request that the trial be suspended on Thursday so he could attend his mother-in-law’s funeral in Florida.

Carroll, 80, was the first witness in a Manhattan federal court trial to determine damages, if any, that Trump owes her for remarks he made while he was president in June 2019 as he vehemently denied ever attacking her or knowing her.

Carroll’s appearance, which continues Wednesday afternoon, was somewhat of a tight rope walk because of limitations the judge has posed on the trial in light of the previous verdict and prior rulings he’s made restricting the infusion of political talk into the proceedings.

She said that Trump’s vitriol toward her has not ceased, pointing to multiple social media posts he made about her in recent days, and that his rhetoric continues to inspire venom against her from strangers because she claimed he sexually abused her decades ago.

Carroll has maintained she lost millions of readers and her longtime post at Elle magazine, where her “Ask E. Jean” advice column ran for over a quarter-century, because of her allegations and Trump’s reaction to them.


The original article contains 1,272 words, the summary contains 255 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
31 points

“I’m granting your request to go to your mother in laws funeral. Don’t come back.”

permalink
report
reply
57 points
*

He can go to her funeral, that’s the ridiculous part. His attorney represents him in court, and anything he misses Thursday can be recounted to him on Friday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Yep. It was just a delaying tactic by Habba. Who is stupid. So it didn’t work. Because the judge is not stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Just because a lawyer tries something that doesn’t work doesn’t mean they’re stupid. They’re being paid to try anything they can.

I’m not saying Habba isn’t stupid, but this isn’t the reason why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
164 points

Don’t kick him out, that’s exactly what he wants.

F**KING ARREST HIM and charge him with contempt of court.

permalink
report
reply
67 points

Judge doesn’t need to charge him, he can just be found in Contempt & held.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Yep, I don’t think I have the self control to be a judge. I think the maximum is 180 days and the very first time he uttered even a syllable off topic or without being asked a direct question his ass would be in for the maximum allowable amount of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I feel the same, but he’s going to appeal and one of the arguments will be that the judge was biased against him. The judge tolerating more than would be expected torpedos that argument. So this is trying to make the result appeal-proof.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Judge: Mr. Trump, I hope I don’t have to consider excluding you from the trial. I understand you’re probably eager for me to do that.

Trump: I would love it

Judge: I know you would like it. You just can’t control yourself in this circumstance, apparently.

Trump (muttering): You can’t either.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is a real conversation had by someone who once was and is again running for president. What fucking weird timeline are we living in?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s pootin’s timeline. We’re just stuck in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hopefully Putin’s is coming to an end. One way or another.

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points
*

Trump just can’t stand having to follow the same rules as everyone else.

Habba called the judge’s ruling “insanely prejudicial” and the judge soon afterward cut her off, saying he would “hear no further argument on it.”

Habba told the judge: “I will not be spoken to that way, your honor.” When she mentioned the funeral again, the judge responded: “It’s denied. Sit down. Bring in the jury.”

So… she would be spoken to that way.

permalink
report
reply
81 points

What kind of ridiculous thing is that to say to a judge, anyway?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

It’s three-ring-circus clown riding a rodeo clown into a mime’s balls (which are wearing a jester’s cap) level ridiculous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

Yeah, one thing a judge can pretty much do without question is talk to you however the hell they damn well please.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

If they are enough of an unreasonable asshole it can come up in appeal though.

I would imagine using language bigoted against a protected class would not help their decision stick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

As I said above, Habba is stupid. Trump-level stupid. He likes her because she has Melania’s body type and I wouldn’t be surprised if he was fucking her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Oof… now I really hope she’s getting paid up front.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I don’t imagine he fucks anyone. Aside from the every American.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

What do you expect from the lawyer who befriended a sexual assault victim, convinced to to drop her existing lawyer for her, then had the victim sign an NDA and accept a pittance sum for suffering through years of sexual abuse. At one of Trump’s golf courses.

Then turned around to Trump and said “look what I did for you”. Which is how she got the current job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Really? Wow, that’s high grade scum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I would personally pay for the rope and duct tape to secure him to his chair and tape-up his orange, fascist mouth.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Make sure to get that nasty prickly rope that’s used on boats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Need to bring him in hannibal lector style

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 478K

    Comments