Rolling Stone spoke with diehard Trump supporters who waited hours in the snow to watch the former president stump in New Hampshire

Fresh off a historic victory in the Iowa caucuses, former President Donald Trump traveled to New Hampshire and complained to his supporters that he had to leave the White House after losing the 2020 election.

Fans had lined up for hours outside in the snow for a chance to see the presumptive Republican nominee in person — excited over his Iowa win, appearing confident he will once again be president.

During his speech, Trump said it “was ridiculous that we had to leave, but we had to leave, we have to follow the laws of our land.” He quickly doubled down on his 2020 election lies: “They don’t investigate the people that cheated in the election. They investigate the people that understand they cheated and go after them. But they don’t investigate the people who cheated like hell. We have to have fair and free elections.”

Of course, Trump is being prosecuted for attempting to rig the 2020 election and overturn the results in key swing states — and as Rolling Stone has reported, he and his allies are working diligently to predetermine the results of the 2024 election and make sure they favor Trump.

203 points

“He’s a family man,” Jerry Bolduc says about Trump. “He believes in God and in America first. And that’s what I’m all about.”

It’s like his fans don’t actually know the first thing about him…

permalink
report
reply
82 points

or the second, third, fourth and fifth things.

The only thing that’s true about Trump being a family man, is he wants to fuck his daughter. Which, to be honest, is rather biblical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I heard an interview the other day where an Iowan trump supporter claimed that Trump was respected by the rest of the world. lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

As someone from Europe, he’s absolutely not lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They think fear is respect or they are pointing to the fascist minority factions within those countries as their source of information. Let’s call it The Fascist International.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Its so funny how he refuses to name his favorite/any known to him Bible verses. Refuses to be pinned down aha

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

The funniest part is that he has had years to just memorize a few lines to make them happy and these people register so little to him that he can’t even bother to do the bare minimum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Except “woman, man, person, TV, camera” isn’t in the Bible, so he was all out of space to learn anything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply

He’s being pedantic, parsing words, being cheeky: everyone knows Mein Kampf is written in prose, not verse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Everything that seems stupid or outrageous about Trump just clicks into place one you’ve accepted the mandatory foundational bullshit. These people didn’t reason themselves into their position, they were looking for something to believe together. It’s just too bad all that faith is wasted on this asshole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

All faith is wasted. Believing in something without evidence is at best naive and at worst stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It’s like believing in Cancers ability to take over a whole body and make it “better”. Technically Cancer is pretty strong, so a whole body of cancer must be super strong right. Just ignore all the things you know about how that would actually work. Just have faith that it will work how we tell you it will work, it sort of feels like it could be a thing, if you don’t think about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They live in some sort of alternate reality where they are blind to facts, I just don’t understand how they arrive at the conclusions they make. It just doesn’t make any sense what so ever. It is going to be studied for generations as a warning for the rest of us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The worst part is, you can’t tell them different. “Family man? You know he cheated on his pregnant wife with a porn star, right?”

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/commentary-why-evangelicals-stick-with-trump-despite-stormy-daniels/

"Perhaps most astonishing, a recent YouGov poll found only half of Trump voters said Trump cheating on his wife with Stormy Daniels would be immoral, even if it did happen. After everything they’ve learned about him, 56 percent of Trump supporters believe the phrase “moral leader” describes the president either “very well” or “extremely well.” "

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I like the optimism, that we have generations left.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

They can’t say “I like abusing women and minorities and wish it was a more acceptable hobby so I’m voting Trump” – the Unite the Right rally showed them that plausible deniability builds platforms and going mask off takes them away.

But they can say clearly bullshit things like this and everyone does them the favor of pretending they actually mean it.

If someone doesn’t politely play along, they’ve been coached at how to manipulate their way out of it with by saying things like “the left just calls everyone they don’t like a Nazi”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No, no, Trump really is a family man…in exactly the same way as Tony Soprano. He is all about HIS family, but definitely not yours!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He doesn’t even clear that low bar. He cheats on his wives and palms his children off on others people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

His supporters don’t even know what they’re about. They can’t think on their own because they’ve been taught to follow without question.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

I never see anyone bring this up, and I truly understand that all of our logical arguments don’t work on Trump’s supporters, but election fraud at the level of a Presidential election? The fuck?!

What does that even look like? How was it done? How were several thousand key people, at the very least, convinced to fake it for Biden and yet no one has stepped forward in guilt? How has the entire Trump machine not been able to unearth the slightest bit of evidence?

One redditor broke it down succinctly in 2020, “We’re smart enough to have faked it and didn’t eliminate Mitch McConnell?!” These people literally don’t understand that all those votes are scored on the same ballots.

I can go on all night, but I know this, Bill Clinton couldn’t get a bj in the Oval Office and keep it quiet.

permalink
report
reply
38 points
*

He made up stories in 2016 that Hillary bussed in millions of immigrants to vote in California, which is why he lost the state no republican has won since Bush the first, who was riding high on Regan’s afterglow.

The pure raw logistics of bussing millions of people anywhere, for any reason, especially on the same day is mind boggling. Pretending that it was done in a stunningly populous state during an election and no one anywhere had any proof of it when ubiquitous camera phones exist, when he already won the election, was mind blowing.

Thats where his lies come from. Pure, raw unchecked ego, with no connection to the world itself. His base wants to believe, so they do, and they more they do, the more he can lie about. Rinse, repeat, until we are now at la la land.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Honestly the craziest part of that lie, to me, was how electable it should have made Hillary sound. She led the coordination of a million person movement in one day for a major event, at so low a cost that it was unnoticeable in any budget, and so seamlessly that no one noticed it happening at the time? That makes her sound like a logistical and strategic badass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

He made up stories in 2016 that Hillary bussed in millions of immigrants to vote in California, …

Math!

  • If a coach bus carries 60 passengers, and there are two million people (“millions”) to be bussed, that would require 33,334 buses.
  • Since each bus requires a driver, that means 33,334 bus drivers.
  • At 45 feet per bus, that’s over 284 miles of buses.
  • If the buses get 6 miles per gallon, and each bus needs to travel a mere 60 miles, that’s a total fuel usage of 333,340 gallons of fuel.
  • Gas and diesel were both around $2.75 a gallon in 2016, which means that the fuel cost alone for this very generous hypothetical scenario would be $916,685.00.
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And the easiest way to bust that conspiracy is to ask:

Why send them all to blue California, and not to any red states?

Do you know how many low-populations states like Wyoming and the Dakotas could be flipped blue with just a few tens of thousands more Democratic voters? It makes no sense to send them to a state you’re already going to win, when you can thin them out and win several states

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Ehh, that has an easy and stupid rebutal:

“Good gun toting Christian patriots would have killed those illegals on sight. It’s only in Satanic Taxifornia where all the godless heathen and DeMoN RaTs live that they could get away with it!”

The key was that he wanted to vilify Hillary, immigrants and California all at once while stroking his own ego.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What happened next pa? Well son as always it was projection and they were the ones busing immigrants around the country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

You’re talking about people who literally think there’s body doubles ruling the country or second military systems with one controlled by Biden and another still by Trump.

The education entrance polling for the Iowa caucuses was eye opening, even being in line with what I expected.

Have a post-graduate degree? 75% Voted for someone other than Trump.

Didn’t go to college? 75% Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

“I love the poorly educated”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not enough non-white representation to be properly aggregated.

Hard stance against immigration.

His support of ‘people like them’ captures 80% of reasons why they’re voting.

It all adds up to them disliking people they have no actual interaction with because the news makes them scary. Just raw, unashamed bigotry marching for the Oval.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Conspiracies don’t have to make sense, they just have to make you feel good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

It’s ridiculous he was there in the first place.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

And it’s about to happen again because ideologically “pure” leftists constantly fall for right-wing propaganda and fail to understand the real world impacts of harm reduction.

Isn’t life in the 21st century just so fucking grand?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Leftists aren’t to blame for the right wing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

ok, but also: not voting empowers an avowed fascist. so…

look the only way to hold biden to account is to make sure we still have a democracy next year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points

voting isn’t harm reduction

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

It is absolutely harm reduction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Not voting and letting insane fascists take over is clearly the better choice when trying to reduce harm.

Voting isn’t a panacea, but saying it isn’t harm reduction makes you sound ignorant or like you’re arguing in bad faith.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Voting certainly can be harm reduction. In its current US form where there is little direct democracy and a lot of single seat voting its not a particularly reliable form of harm reduction given its reliance on swing state voters and gerrymandered seats, but its still harm reduction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
15 points

The answer is usually that someone else would simply take his place. Not happening here. The GOP can’t even post a plausible 2nd place candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

People absolutely LOVE that line of logic. “Well if Putin were deposed, he’s just be replaced by someone just as bad!!!1111”. In reality, some people are unique set of skills, and who ever would move into Putin’s role wouldn’t have those skills, and wouldn’t make the same decisions as he would have.

The same thing applies to Trump, he’s uniquely terrible, and none of the other GOP candidates even come close in terms of the type of damage they’d do as president vs what Trump will do. None of those other candidates would unify all the crazy MAGA people like Trump does. So in this instance, he’s singular, he’s terrible, and he really needs to stop being in the spot light, and just fade away. He’s already inflicted more damage on the United States then any foreign enemy could have dreamed of. Another term of that clown would be catastrophic.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Indeed

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, where’s Paul Ryan at? He crawled under a rock after stumping for Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m legit surprised nobody has had a decent crack at it

permalink
report
parent
reply

If he wins, I think someone would try.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

we have to follow the laws of our land

Yeah, but you don’t.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments