A federal judge threatened to kick Donald Trump out of court Wednesday after the former president made repeated comments within earshot of the jury hearing a civil defamation trial against him.

Trump muttered that the case is a “witch hunt,” among other similar comments, according to a lawyer for the writer E. Jean Carroll, who is suing Trump over derogatory comments he made about her while he was president.

The episode prompted a stern rebuke from U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who repeatedly tussled with Trump and his lawyers during a testy courtroom session Wednesday morning.

“Mr. Trump has the right to be present here. That right can be forfeited, and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive, which is what has been reported to me,” the judge said.

14 points
*

Mr. Trump has the right to be present here. That right can be forfeited, and it can be forfeited if he is disruptive…

Doesn’t that make it a privilege?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Exactly. A right shouldn’t be able to be revoked, otherwise by definition it’s not a right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I mean, Fuck Trump, but yeah…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Does imprisonment invalidate the right to freedom?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Then you have no rights. All freedoms granted you can be taken away for committing the right crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Sure, that’s true, that’s why there are different types of rights, look up natural rights versus things like inalienable rights. At the end of the day all rights are just ideas and concepts, but still, I think calling it a right and threatening to take it away in the context of his trial is no bueno

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You’re confusing the word revoked with the word forfeited. He’s forfeiting it by disrupting the court. It’s like the right to remain silent when you’re arrested. The officer arresting you can’t revoke it and make you answer or say anything, but you can choose to forfeit it and start talking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

You want Trump to lose in court ASAP

I want Trump to lose against diabetes ASAP

We are not the same

permalink
report
reply
22 points

I know it’s a longshot, but I’m really hoping for rabies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I hope for nothing contagious: his sycophants would deliberately infect themselves to be more like him and end up causing a rabies pandemic

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I can see how that would be bad, but somehow I just can’t stop feeling like that would benefit the world so much more than it would harm it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s probably syphilis though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Porque no los dos?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He got caught googling symptoms and treatment for HPV.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’d be pretty satisfied with him being accidentally fired into space

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“nobody has ever been shot out of a cannon, ever, into space… No, never! The demmacrats don’t wanchyou you to know about it because it makes them mad. I’m the bravest president, everyone is saying so”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You want Trump to lose against diabetes ASAP

I want Trump to lose, on the toilet, against a perforated colon and prolapsed rectum ASAP

We are, well, kinda the same, so hi-five friendo

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Those hamberders’ll catch up with him one of these days

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That would be a real covfefe

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Porque no los dos?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Honestly I don’t think Trump should be kicked out of court. I say let him ruin his case and insult the judge until he’s found guilty for contempt of court as well.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

He’s already well past what would be considered contempt of court for literally any other living human being. They’re giving him as much rope as is possible for two reasons, one being so that absolutely no one can argue a mistrial, and the second being that he continues to attempt to hang himself with every length of rope let out to him. May as well let him continue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

so that absolutely no one can argue a mistrial

This is the part that people keep missing. Judges go into “Super Professional Mode” when these things happen and run their court so by the book that it’s impossible for anyone to complain bias/unfair treatment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I dont think the people who, and I say this with certainty, WILL compmain its unfair care at all. Even the ones with political power will spin it and have half the country believing that the most lieniant judges of all time are what ‘anti conservative bias’ looks like. It’s like moving the overton window on justice. Republicans after this will believe unless the judge lets a republican defendent sit in their lap and bang the gavel dismissing their own case it is bias. And that’s going to linger every time you try and punish law breakers who they like. Those people make it on juries and when they dont they use bomb threats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

This lawless former president is a disgusting degenerate just like his cult followers.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Don’t forget twice-impeached accused rapist

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He was found liable of rape in the civil suit with E Jean Carrol. So confirmed rapist!

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

While “former president” is a correct title, the media should really use “petulant man-child” instead. Far more accurate .

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Petulant man-child also applies to Phony Stark.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Traitor Trump fits too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Fuckface 45

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This one. I choose this one.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 412K

    Comments