To me, TERFs are the saddest group of all. They are literally inventing shit to be mad at. That bussy ain’t for you Marta! I’ll take a bit though.
The TE part contradicts the RF part, so yeah probably. I don’t think they value consistency anyways
I think at this point we should just start calling them female supremacists. I mean they are starting in with the “Gay men are coming over here and taking our jobs!” rhetoric now.
TERFs are just gender fassicts. Which is why they welcome explicit Nazis at their events and JK loves Matt Walsh.
What? Wait. What? No. Not at all…
-
TERFs are not feminists, seen by the fact that they are fascists. They use the language of “protecting women” to hide bigotry and exclusion while ignoring the core concept of liberation from patriarchy. Pick up any feminist text and youll see a rich history of women allying with queer people. Absolutely nothing about their cause is “just”.
-
Calling persecution of trans women misandry is itself transphobia.
The most tragic thing about this is that she isn’t even using the word breedable correctly. The traditional meaning of the word, which she is trying to gatekeep, means to produce offspring. Humans breed by procreating with another human to create human children. Vaginas do not breed with other vaginas to create vagina children, so vaginas are not breedable.
Even if you think the slang form of the word breedable this guy used is invalid, he’s still breedable as long as he’s capable of impregnating someone, even if he has no desire to do so.
The difference between technically correct and contextually correct.
You know the argument is getting old when the debate is over semantics rather than the implication of the statement.
deleted by creator
wow, what a bitch
