99 points

Every Democrat I know irl is a kind, considerate person with empathetic views.

So it’s amazing to me that the party seems to go out of its way to find the most horrific ghouls and status quo warriors to set forth in a federal election, especially really fucking important elections

permalink
report
reply
77 points

The DNC doesn’t give a fuck about the Democratic voters as long as they keep voting for their selected candidates

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Even if we don’t they pick their candidate anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

they made it clear what they think of us when clinton elevated trump in 2016

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They care about you less if you don’t vote.

If we want better candidates we should be prepping for 2028 and 2032 now. Not 2024. We have a big chance coming up. So many of the boomers that have been in control of all levels of government for the last several decades. Neocons and neoliberals are all dying out. And being forced to retire. Change is coming one way or another.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Because the parties don’t represent the people. The parties represent the interests of those with most influence in the party. In the modern system it is those who make the most impactfull and sustained donation efforts. The rest is just marketing used to secure enough votes in the election show according to arbitrary rules they set and change as they see fit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The parties represent liberals and fascists, when leftists are gaining in grassroots popularity. This grassroots movement must continue to build momentum and make real change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

So it’s amazing to me that the party seems to go out of its way to find the most horrific ghouls and status quo warriors to set forth in a federal election, especially really fucking important elections

I think its useful to distinguish between Democrats and democrats. I try to use Democrats for party officials, elected officials, talking heads within the party etc. I try to use democrats for democratic voters.

Democrats do not have the priorities of their voters in mind, and have, since the 90’s, wished that they actually had republicans for voters. Democrats don’t want to be managing a leftwing party (the votership they largely have), they want to be managing a rightwing party. The Democratic party reconfigured its self to be diet Republican after Carter and have been failing forwards ever since.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I lived through all of that and you put it just right: They kept failing forward. If they weren’t the only alternative to the Republicans the party would have died after 1984.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s probably obvious we need more choices but how?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I suspect the DNC is gonna try another Bill Clinton style southern strategy and appeal to disenfranchised conservatives by shifting further to the right. And current democrat voters will shift to the right with them, defending their right wing actions tooth and nail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Yeah, it seems with every candidate, we veer further to the right

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Feelings aside, Biden is objectively one of the most, if not the most, progressive President we’ve had in modern history.

[Bernie] Sanders said that some of the early goals that the Biden administration and a Democratic Congress were able to accomplish in the first two years of Biden’s presidency were progressive victories, including the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan.

“I think the American Rescue Plan that we passed early in his agenda, in the midst of the terrible pandemic, the economic collapse, was, in fact, one of the most significant pieces of legislation for the working class in this country, in the modern history of America,” Sanders said.

https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/3865355-sanders-biden-a-more-progressive-president-than-he-was-as-senator/

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Well it’s simple, what are the Democrat voters going to do, vote 3rd party?

They’re held hostage to the party, so the party has no need to reflect them, it just has to be less bad than the Republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

https://youtu.be/WS2Bsq5PDmU?si=MC0DCuKP0hzWDMyF

Don’t blame me, I voted for Kodos!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Of everyone who claims no third party could win would actually coalesce around and vote for a third party candidate, the third party would win. Their children apparently aren’t suffering and starving enough, yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

That’s not true for the president. They are not picked by popular vote but the electoral college, and it’s “first to get half the Electoral College votes”, not who ever gets the most. It takes a literal majority, otherwise Congress or some other suits just get to pick.

The US is absolutely not a democracy when it comes to 2/3rds of its branches of government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Everyone wants a third party, but not everyone wants the same third party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No they wouldn’t, it would, at most, be a deadlock between the three parties that the House would decide on. One would hope they would go with the one with the most votes, but in reality they can pick anyone. Including someone who wasn’t even one of the top three candidates.

Not to mention all the people who want a “third party” aren’t necessarily going to vote for the same third party. They all want their own person. Most likely none of them would get anywhere near the majority popular vote, much less any electoral votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ranked Choice Voting: “It smell like bitch in here”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

what are the Democrat voters going to do, vote 3rd party?

Sit on their hands like they did in 2016.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You mean the election that had record voter turnout all over the country? Is that what sitting on your hands means?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

They could vote for any of the other DNC candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Unless you’re in Nee Hampshire right?

Or like we saw with Bernie, they’ll sabotage your campaign and rig the DNC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

“Genocide Joe” is a little crass, but he absolutely deserves to be taken to task for his blind support of the IDF/IOF. That’s more important to me as a voter than hearing circle jerk promises about known positions. We know he’s pro abortion rights, he’s shown that. Now it’s time to address the elephant in the room.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I prefer The Butcher of Palestine

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

If you don’t like it, vote in the primary!

(Unless you live in NH, then you don’t get a primary. Also the DNC reserves all rights to ignore any primary election)

Either we get rid of the two party system, or it’s gonna be the death of democracy.

There can’t just be two options picked by private organizations… That’s just the illusion of choice when billionaires and corporations donate to both parties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Vote in all primaries. Vote in state and local. Vote on your local dog-catcher.

The President isn’t the only office that matters, and really it doesn’t even make up a majority of the importance. It’s just easier to get people to focus on it, and ignore all the other just as important elections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I get what you’re saying, and I’m very involved locally, have even considered running myself, but then what? We’ve still got immigrants and refugees in concentration camps, still can’t get anyone, especially women or trans youth, access to healthcare, can’t redistribute wealth, can’t give land back to the tribes. I still feel powerless. Now what? Just be content with that?

permalink
report
parent
reply

We’re held hostage by one party and get literal death threats from the other. It sucks, man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This is why their only political message is “vote for us or you’ll be sorry.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

“A vote for our candidate is slightly better than chopping off your nuts with a rusty cleaver and pouring salt on the gaping wound. Vote Blue!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah, but the other guy is actively campaigning on chopping your balls off for laughs and keeps showing up to rallies with a cleaver and a salt shaker…so y’know…you pick your fucking battles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

So it’s amazing to me that the party seems to go out of its way to find the most horrific ghouls and status quo warriors to set forth in a federal election, especially really fucking important elections

Can you elaborate on what you mean that “the party seems to go out of its way to find the most horrific ghouls and status quo warriors to set forth in a federal election”? Are you unaware of the fact that Biden is the incumbent President?

He was nominated by a wide margin against a dozen other candidates (including over my preferred candidate), and elected with solid EC majority and a record number of individual votes.

To suggest that he was somehow appointed by the party establishment, when he’s simply running for reelection like almost every incumbent President in American history has done after their first term seems like a very disingenuous statement. It’s interesting that nobody leveled that argument against Trump when he ran for reelection in 2020, not to mention every other time it’s happened, considering it’s been the norm for decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A lot of us live in states that didnt get to vote in the primaries, and a lot of us show up to every election even when neither option really represents our views (albeit one much more than the other). To say we aren’t getting our way cause we aren’t voting, though undoubtedly true for some, is a bad take

This is not even touching on the DNC putting their finger on the scales in the primaries that did happen

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Did every centrist decide to tediously lecture the left 5 times a day? I’ve voted in every election since I turned 18 and I see at least 10 dipshit centrists lecturing someone to vote or there will be fascism. I’m pretty sure leftists already know about fucking fascism, the thing we’ve been consistently resisting since like 1930. Stop being a fucking nag and we’ll vote for Biden.

Also, it’s also good if someone cares about ethnic cleansing and settler-driven apartheid. It’s kind of horrifying more people don’t. Sorry if I come off as smug when objecting to crimes against humanity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He was also at an abortion rights rally when the protest occurred, which many people are glossing over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I know plenty of Dems who voted trump because abortion. I think a lot is the demographics’ religion. I’ve heard too many say they will vote for trump because at least he gave them $1200. And a friend told me in conversation he visited a (all black) church where the pastor said he doesn’t care if trump is elected, because “God has a plan.”

Biden leaves much to be desired, and waited until election year to mention price-gouging, even try to contend with border red states and abortion. Facts are, both establishment parties are on the same Team Gazillionaire, which isn’t us, and they don’t want it to ever be us. It’s time we wake up that one party is just more sneaky about it, and they’re really not that sneaky. And the EC is still in place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Biden leaves much to be desired, and waited until election year to mention price-gouging, even try to contend with border red states and abortion. Facts are, both establishment parties are on the same Team Gazillionaire, which isn’t us, and they don’t want it to ever be us. It’s time we wake up that one party is just more sneaky about it, and they’re really not that sneaky. And the EC is still in place.

You can’t convince me that a native English-speaker wrote this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Is there some reason you think people who aren’t native English speakers shouldn’t be involved in American politics? 🤨

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points
*

Yeah, and it feels that way all over the world.

For example, the recent election in Argentina was between a Libertarian nutjob and a corrupt center-left party. Unfortunately the corrupt center-left party lost, and now the maniac is wrecking their economy.

Then you’ve got the Labor party in Britain, who despite all of Brexit couldn’t manage to form a government.

It’s like the entire world is trapped between the options of idiotic populism and neoliberalism.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Things would improve if we ate the rich.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Saying that Milei is wrecking the economy is like saying a bulldozer is wrecking a house when it already got hit by a JDAM

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

Abortion rights and a free Palestine!

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Then the audience — made up of many young people & women — immediately started chanting things like “Four more years” & “Let’s go Joe.” Be careful of these stories.

permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

Well, obviously. The audience was there to see Biden because they presumably like him. You think the protestors were going to suddenly win over his strongest supporters after yelling for accountability from their hero? Biden, the audience, and the press covering the event weren’t getting what they wanted to hear, but they needed to hear it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It was a pro-abortion rally. Probably not the best moment for a pro-Palestine protest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

lmao, really!? The “it’s not appropriate” argument?

Please let the protestors there know when they can reach Biden in their home town at a more reasonable occasion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Edit: Whoops, replied to the post, not the comment.

Oh, I wasn’t ignoring the intent to eliminate an ethnic group; I know that it’s necessary for for proving a genocide, and will be the most difficult part of South Africa’s case. Maybe they’ll find something that can clarify Israel’s intent, like an official calling for Gaza to be completely reduced to rubble, or a member of the Iraeli parliament calling on for nuclear strikes to, “crush Gaza,”, or a cabinet official calling what’s happening in Gaza an ethnic cleansing, or an Israeli minister calling for settlers to illegally take control of the territory. (Of course, this is just a few recent examples from this war. You could go from the Nakba all the way to the illegal West Bank settlements if you wanted to give the intent in a historical context.)

Anyway, you’ve really illustrated why the American centrist is so ridiculous. You honestly want to argue that a nuclear-powered (yes, Israel has nukes, even if they don’t admit it) military with a $20 billion budget that is systematically destroying a civilian population couldn’t possibly be committing genocide because none of their founding documents say, “genocide.” Meanwhile, you also want me to accept that a terrorist organization with homemade rockets, that controls an area the smaller than Detroit, with a military budget of $350 million, is just as capable of committing genocide. Not only that, any deaths they cause are a genocide, because their charter calls for genocide (which is obviously ridiculous; by this logic, Dylan Roof committed genocide). You are a deeply unserious person and I’m done with this absurd exercise.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 417K

    Comments