Ouch.

10 points

“Women are too emotional to vote, they should only have firearms instead” is parody material.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

If they were able to think, they wouldn’t be staunch conservatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s called second-order thinking. Most of them don’t have it. They are slowly replacing any of their leaders that can do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s right up there with the GOP forcing kids to have babies but don’t want to lower the voting age to 16 because “they’re too immature”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nothing bad has ever happened when emotions and firearms combine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How do these cartoonishly stupid people live like this?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I think it’s brainwashing for some and grifting for others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ahhh yes, because the people that are liable to take away women’s right to vote is surely going to continue to allow them to own firearms.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

is that the poo lady?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I knew I knew that name for a reason. She shit herself at a party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, who hasn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yep, apparently shit falls from both ends on that one

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah, though somehow not the most cringe thing she did at college

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m either out of the loop or need more context to make the connection. What?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s a picture of a girl with a similar build and hair as Kaitlyn. This girl is passed out face down with an enormous pile of shit resting on her thighs. While I can’t say for certain it is her in that picture, someone once asked her if she shit herself at a frat party and her response was “why are you talking about that?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Probably the weirdest thing about modern American politics, to me, is the fact that the myth that left-wingers favor government intervention and right-wingers favor individual liberty still holds, when it’s so bludgeoningly obvious that the opposite is in fact true.

At this point, it’s pretty much just a given if you read an article about some government banning something - denying some right or another - that it’s the right that’s doing it. That’s become their response to everything - whatever it is, we need to ban it. We need to get the government to interfere in everything, all the time.

Yet somehow, dunderheads continue to hold to this brazenly inaccurate myth that the left is the big government side and the right is the individual liberty side.

It’s just weird to me, and not weird in a scoffing, cynicsl way - weird in an entirely alien, this doesn’t even begin to even make sense way. It’s as if right-wingers are running around, alternately billing themselves as the “don’t get punched in the mouth” party and punching themselves in the mouth.

“See?! [Punch] If you vote for us [Punch] you won’t get punched! [Punch] We’re the party [Punch] that takes a stand against [Punch] punching! [Punch].”

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Left-wingers generally want government intervention that applies to corporations and the wealthy, usually tax stuff to help fund social programs and regulations to keep people safe etc. Right-wingers generally want government intervention that applies to individuals, usually regarding stuff that does not actually affect them at all but they don’t like it so they want the government to force people to stop doing such things.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Community stats

  • 296

    Monthly active users

  • 29

    Posts

  • 133

    Comments