249 points

Minority leader Tim Knopp said:

we are deeply disturbed by the chilling impact this decision will have to crush dissent

Give me a fucking break. As a legislator, you have no shortage of ways to dissent including access to media, the ability to speak on the floor of the legislature, and the ability to vote on legislation. What you can’t do, if you want to keep your job is not show up for work every time you know you’re going to lose a vote so that the legislature can’t do business.

permalink
report
reply
86 points

“What about a musician who wants to express a nonpartisan message that young people should participate in our democracy?”

That’s DIFFERENT she needs to JUST SHUT UP

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

“She said she votes for human rights, so we know she votes for the wrong team.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

As an Oregon voter, tough shit. We voted with a 68% majority to amend the state constitution, with explicit penalties for legislative absenteeism.

The chilling impact they are feeling is the will of the people bitch slapping their defunct political strategy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

“But that’s all just Portland voters! All the rest us of didn’t want that!” - My idiot father. Yeah dude, Portland is most of us. Your vote isn’t worth more just because you live around less people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

Land doesn’t vote

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That’s still a majority. Tough shit pops, do some math.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

It’s not even true. There are 3 million registered voters in Oregon, of whom 565k are in Portland (well, Multnomah). While we lean very heavily D, most of the registered D’s in the state are elsewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

Refuse to do job.

Get fired.

/surprisedpikachu

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Not even fired, but not rehired when their contract is up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

we are deeply disturbed by the chilling impact this decision will have to crush dissent

What they really said is: Wah! Boohoo! We don’t like consequences for our actions! Wah! Wah!

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Daddy, why are they fucking around and when they find out, they’re being little bitches?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Because they are little bitches.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The amendment says a lawmaker is not allowed to run “for the term following the election after the member’s current term is completed.” The senators claimed the amendment meant they could seek another term, since a senator’s term ends in January while elections are held the previous November.

What a slimey disingenuous BS argument. They are knowingly trying to subvert the law specifically aimed at their behavior while pretending it’s SOMEHOW the will of the voters to ignore them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

‘Crush dissent’? lol good you clown, I don’t think law makers should be crushing dissent…

permalink
report
parent
reply
208 points

Conservatives supported this rule to punish those who attempted to manipulate sessions by not showing up. When the rule applies to them, they pretend they are victims of some kind.

The entire time the walk-out was happening, they told the media the rule wouldn’t apply to them and they intended to run again. It was pure arrogance as it happened. And it’s pure arrogance now as they claim their rule shouldn’t apply to them.

Fuck conservatives. A conservative is incapable of honesty. Every word they utter is deception or manipulation. Every word.

permalink
report
reply
78 points

As an orgonian, fuck yes, that entire group can go eat a bag of dicks.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

…eat a bag of dicks…

Why would you reward them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

* expired dicks

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

yeah, give me those dicks

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We should hang out sometime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

The GOP loves whining and not doing their job. These people are being paid to represent people, by wilfully abusing quorum to stall the process they are doing their constituents a major disservice.

Filibuster if you want to stand there and defend against change you disagree with, but using absence as a political weapon is slimy and low effort.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Isn’t that literally what the nazis did? Block decision making by walking out of the Reichstag when they were in the oposition?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yeah they also used the term “fake news” to illegitimize opposing news sources just like a specific rotten orange I refuse to name

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Huh. Who’d thought?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Oh brother…that word is thrown around way too much by both sides…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Just to clarify, I was not referring to anybody as a Nazi, I simply noted, that the method of blocking votes and using “the system” against itself is not new. And when the methods someone uses have been deployed by the literal original nazis, then I find this noteworthy.

I agree in general. The term is used as a strong word to clarify someone’s stand point, but besides cheers from within the own bubble and resistance from. The other bubble, nothing happens. The bubbles won’t be dissolved that way. I the end, I think, globally, there is no fight “left VS right” but democrats VS autocrats (not referring to the democratic party here) , and whoever values liberty should stand together against autocrats independently of the party someone prefers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

As an Oregonian…

Hehe. Hehehehe! Hehehahahaaahahah!!! …*gasp*… HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 472K

    Comments