Alina Habba “can’t even do things that you learn in evidence class,” says CNN legal analyst Elie Honig

A former White House attorney for Donald Trump said Wednesday he’s “not surprised” the former president is looking for new representation for his appeal of the defamation trial verdict, calling out Trump lawyer Alina Habba’s management of the case. Trump announced late Tuesday that he was seeking new counsel for his appeal of the $83.3 million verdict in the defamation lawsuit brought by writer E. Jean Carroll. Habba, who served as Trump’s lead attorney and frequently clashed with the presiding judge throughout the trial, handled the case “in the mafia way,” Ty Cobb told CNN Wednesday, according to HuffPost.

“She’s done his bidding. She’s articulated his political narrative of victimization and unfairness in the judicial system and made some outlandish claims, including the conflict claims,” Cobb continued. "And she lost, so she’s a loser. I’m not surprised that Trump is looking for appellate representation.”

123 points
*

I doubt he will replace her with anyone more competent. He can’t afford anyone good, has a poor track record of picking lawyers, and he’s burned too many bridges without the cash to pay for it.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

He’s also stiffed multitudes of his previous service providers and contractors, IIRC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Trumpworld Lawyers Keep Getting Stiffed on Fees, apparently this is a very common occurrence in Trumpworld. Everyone is stiffing everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Also his idea of “good” is someone who doesn’t contradict him. He wants to run the case his way, and no reasonably intelligent lawyer will ever agree to that as it will make them look like idiots and the case is a sure loss.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

You’d have to be paid enough up front to destroy your career. I don’t think he has the money for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

And a huge rack is a bonus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Pretty key feature for her predictable career pivot to right wingnut TV legal commentator in 3, 2, 1…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The attorney for the plaintiff even said her entire demeanor changed when trump was out of the room. He wants loyalty, competence optional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Guess we can assume Alina Habba isn’t “reasonably intelligent” then cause… man, does she look like an idiot.

permalink
report
parent
reply

“Somebody said to me ‘Alina, would you rather be smart or pretty?’ and I said ‘Oh easy, pretty… I can fake being smart’.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/alina-habba-trump-lawyer-court-b2481296.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Well that’s obviously true! Trump’s one of the greatest legal minds ever, so any ordinary lawyer should simply recognise this and follow Trump’s lead. Anything else means you’re a dumb lawyer /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

That’s a good point. I should offer my services and then let him take the stand to his own detriment. I’ll even say I’ll do it for free upfront.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

That’s kind of a cool idea, but depending on where you are this is illegal and/or unethical as lawyers have a fiduciary duty to represent their client’s best interest.

https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/fiduciary-duty

A lawyer owes a fiduciary duty to a client. The lawyer must at all times act in the best interest of the client and must make full disclosure of any economic or other interest that the lawyer has that might conflict with the interest of the client. The lawyer is obligated to take all actions and give all advice that will benefit the client and to use professional skill and energy to protect the client’s interests. Should a conflict of interest arise (for example, the lawyer discovers that one client wishes to hire him to sue another one of his clients) the lawyer must immediately make full disclosure of such conflict and take steps to immediately end the conflict regardless of the personal cost to the lawyer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Good thing I’m not a lawyer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The client gets to decide the client’s best interest. If he wants to take the stand, blocking him from doing so would be a violation of fiduciary duty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m waiting for the court appointed attorneys to show up. at least for the criminal trials.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I mean… feels like that’s 100% on Trump for having selected her as his attorney in the first place? To be fair, his selection criteria for her was probably along the lines of “she got a law degree and she’s hot and I think I could convince her to let me fuck her” because Habba does loosely resemble a younger Melania

permalink
report
reply
33 points

she’s hot and I think I could convince her to let me fuck her> >

Yeah… getting approval for sex isn’t exactly his m.o. Fucking women without permission is how dip shit got to this trial in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I mean I get what you’re saying… but as much of an imbecile as he is, I really don’t think he’s dumb enough to rape (or even attempt to rape) his own civil defense lawyer in a case about financial damages he owes a plaintiff that he raped, lost a case against, which effectively legally established that he raped her, and then continued to slander about said rape and case. Like… there has to be a limit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Like… there has to be a limit.

And yet the limit keeps on getting pushed…

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Everytime I think that idiot can’t possibly be that stupid or do something that shitty, he takes it to another level. There is no floor on this thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I thought I was numb to all the escalating scandals, but you’re right, that would be a whole new level of deranged behavior.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Wouldn’t be surprised if they were fucking.

And then she realized she was never getting paid and stopped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Wouldn’t be surprised if they were fucking.

Ew. That’s in my head now! EWWW!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

She looks a lot like a brunette Ivanka…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well get used to it because he’s going for America round two

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t want to think about that, despite which I now can’t help but wonder if she’s more competent in the bedroom than she is in the courtroom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

It’s so weird how Trump seems to constantly surround himself with losers… it’s almost like, I don’t know, maybe Trump himself is a loser?

permalink
report
reply
21 points

It’s so weird how Trump seems to constantly surround himself with losers…

And criminals. Lots and lots of criminals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Ends up you can fake being smart, but you can’t fake competence.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Now she can try faking being employable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
3 points

hah! I’ve been faking competence for longer than I’m able to admit!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s mighty smart

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Has he ever considered not committing crimes?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Simple as

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments