“Even though he’s entitled to his opinions, he’s not entitled to his own set of facts”

During a broadcast of Donald Trump’s speech at a “Get Out the Vote” rally in Rock Hill, South Carolina on Friday evening, Fox News host Neil Cavuto cut into the footage to point out inaccuracies in what was being said by the former president and 2024 Republican frontrunner.

Taking issue with Trump claiming credit for the market going up while, in the same breath, blaming Biden for inflated gas prices and whatever else, Cavuto said, “We’ll continue monitoring the president’s remarks and I mean no offense to him or some of you who might want to continue to hear him, but I did have to say that even though the former president is entitled to his opinions, he’s not entitled to his own set of facts.”

141 points

Wow…absolutely blown away. I literally never thought I’d see journalistic integrity from anyone even loosely associated with FauxNews…

permalink
report
reply
90 points

The dominion lawsuit has them scared, rightfully so

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

They know trump isnt as popular as in 2016, and are erring on the side of caution as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They don’t care about his overall popularity, they only care about his popularity with their viewing demographic, and he’s as popular with that demo as he’s ever been. More so, honestly.

Remember Trump won more votes in 2020 than 2016, and his popular vote percentage rose by 0.7%. The fact he still had that much after 4 years of his shit tells you everything you need to know about these voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I read: “The Dominion” and DS9 instantly took over my mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If only Jeffrey Combs would come take Trump to another quadrant of the galaxy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

My understanding is they could play all the videos of Trump saying bullshit they want, just not assert it themselves. They could repeat it but be careful to say “Person x alleges this” rather than stating mistruths as fact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know if this is so much them being scared, the vibe I’m getting here is that the anchor finally feels like he can get away with being a bit of a real journalist, when before he would be reprimanded by the network.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Fox news’ reporters have always been reasonable, maybe on the low end of reasonable, but reasonable. The thing that makes Fox as a network awful is their opinion people, and how much they blur the line between their opinion people and their reporters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Could be opportunism. Fox senses that Trump might go to prison or get barred from the election in another way, and so they either prepare endorsing a different candidate or are simply cautious.

But it’s journalism by accident at best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Fox never actually wanted Trump, but they radicalized their viewers too much. They tried to criticize him before while he was president, but each time they did their ratings went down and OAN’s went up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I wouldn’t necessarily call it integrity. I think Faux News has realized they created a monster that lost them a ton of viewers to even worse garbage at Newsmax. They’re trying to walk it all back now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

and best of fucking luck to them in all that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They ought to know that since they were first to call Arizona for Biden, they will be first against the wall if he is re-elected

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They wont be associated much longer

permalink
report
parent
reply
130 points

Cavuto went on to shoot down his claim that gas prices are at $6 a gallon, sourcing the real price as being an average of $3.26 a gallon.

Good. I’m so sick of the wild bullshit like that this baboon makes up. Gas is around 2.80 where I live which seems quite cheap given that it was that price 20 years ago and everything else has gone up so much. Then, of course, there’s the fact a lot of people are super-confused about that presidents don’t set the price of gas.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

Back in the day if you couldn’t nail the price of a gallon of milk you were an out of touch elite. Trump hasn’t bought gas himself in decades I’m sure. That’s the lesson people should take from this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Finally I made it to the upper crust. I have no idea what a gallon of milk costs. Take that everyone making less than 40 a year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Next milestone? Circular driveway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s one gallon of milk, Michael. What could it cost, $10?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Does that mean I’m rich or just lactose intolerant?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I bought milk yesterday and I couldn’t tell ya what it cost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

He started out with, what was it, 10 million dollars? I don’t think he’s ever bought gas in person. If you look at his business dealings, you start to wonder if he’s ever paid for anything in any transaction at any point in his life.

EDIT: Wait! I forgot about Stormy Daniels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He started out with, what was it, 10 million dollars?

Way more than that https://apnews.com/article/0452d29cd2564eaf97605ab90acc3a67

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why buy gas when he makes his own every time he opens one of his orifices…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

people are super-confused about that presidents don’t set the price of gas.

It seems to be mostly one side of aisle that can’t grasp it. Always the same line of “gas was so much cheaper under trump…”

and I always reply with “well you should have seen the gas prices under clinton, you would be a massive fan!”.

It usually goes as well as you’d expect it to.

permalink
report
parent
reply

But if gas prices go down under a Dem, they’re killing jorbs and that’s bad. /j

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Lower gas prices means less profit for their nepotistic buddies who own the fuel companies.

These are the folks who donate to their reelection PACs to keep them marketable to the population with ads.

These lost politicians don’t want to bite the hand that feeds because at the end of the day the population won’t support them based on ideals, they have to spew propaganda around and that shit is expensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“But Clinton was 30 years ago!”

“And it was low during the trumpet reign when there was a pandemic. So you do understand that different time periods affect prices.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

After all the maths for gallons to liters and euros to dollars and vice versa, gas where I live is about $8.50.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Jesus christ that’s a lot!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

It’s not a coincidence that the strategic oil reserves are at a historic low.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Biden saw the supply chain issues from covid and played the oil reserve game pretty much perfectly. I think his experience was very beneficial in the transition out of covid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
111 points

WE NEEDED THIS IN 2015, It’s too late now

permalink
report
reply
66 points

The second best time to start is now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I think we’re on the 2664th best time around now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yes there isn’t going to be much course correction with the crazy trump train but they absolutely can start doing it for all the nutcase politicians he paved the way for and it will maybe make a difference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It has to…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If they pick and choose which facts to fact check, then it might be worse than not doing it at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Don’t the networks only see dollar signs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

They might be worried after having to pay out their ass for parroting Trump on election denial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think they’re (fox) probably sending a message to him here that he better do what they want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes, so true. 8 years and the ship is too far out now for any chance of reversal

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

Has everyone forgot that Trump worked to raise gas prices and bragged about it?

https://www.chicagotribune.com/2020/04/15/column-trumps-push-for-higher-gas-prices-is-misguided/

permalink
report
reply
36 points

You think pointing out one specific contradiction will be a wake up call to anyone? It’s hard to find a single sentence this sack of shit says that there isn’t written or recorded evidence of him previously contradicting. He has spoken on both sides of literarly almost every topic he talks about at some point. He is the ultimate null, he cancels himself out and proves himself a worthless nothing over and over again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

You know his base doesn’t give a shit about that. He also said he’d take away all the guns and go through due process later but they don’t remember nor care about that either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Yeah, good luck with that.

Once you radicalize someone, it’s not always so easy to bring them back. They can just migrate to even more hardcore Russian propaganda outlets.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

It’s true. Time and time again these fools are radicalizing their base, and then when it gets out of hand they can’t rein it in and it bites them.

Fox and a handful of right-wing politicians made radicalizing into a profitable business that’s not regulated and freely available to anyone with no scruples and an imagination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Let’s not forget social media companies and their algorithms that take advantage of human psychology to drive profits. Not helping.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

The people that far gone started pissing on Fox News the day they said Biden won the election. Maybe even a little before that.

I get the distinct impression Fox thinks it can pivot to a different set of subscribers as its armchair-bound geriatric viewers die of Covid and old age.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Maybe. We’ll have to see if this is a one time thing where the anchor is going to get yelled at and never done again, or if it flags a new editorial direction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

As MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml pointed out, Tucker leaving Fox has done wonders for Fox, but ended up creating that more hardcore Russian propaganda outlet you are talking about. I mean, an interview with Putin, how much more Russian propaganda can it get?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They can just migrate to even more hardcore Russian propaganda outlets.

RT?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was thinking more OAN, but yeah, that’s probably its final form.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 471K

    Comments