241 points
*

How about we go back to the one where we applied a marginal tax rate of 90% to the rich?

permalink
report
reply
189 points

And 30+% union membership

And houses that cost 4x median income

And shooting Nazis

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Y’all are describing my wet dreams. Keep going!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

How can you be so cruel? Those poor widdle Nazis have feelings too, you know?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Not for long.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The Nazi will fear us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Mmmm, nice dream

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

The modern rich are only rich on paper and in stock. For the rest they have debts that borrow against their stocks meaning they are still taxed at 0. This needs to be adressed as well then. Maybe by counting the cash out of such loans as realized gains or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

tax on unrealized gains based on the tax year those gains happen, same with losses.

Big win one year? awesome! pay taxes!

big loss next year? bummer! no taxes if you only lost money… but no carrying that shit over.

Imagine all that money which would have FLOODED the economy post-covid while people were poor as shit that would have wiped out the national debt which in no small part was from handouts to the ‘welfare kings’ with businesses that pocketed tons of free cash from dumpy’s bailouts in covid times. Full circle could have been nice.

Instead we just get f’d.

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points

The monkey’s paw curls. Mark Robinson is transported back to the year 1900. Women can’t vote. He is then promptly arrested and imprisoned for the crime of being a colored man in a whites-only establishment.

permalink
report
reply
44 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

True, Mark would face lots of racism back then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

I sometimes think that the GOP is going out of their way to field the most bat-shit crazy field of candidates at all levels just to make Trump look sane by comparison.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

Nah they’re voters are just that mentally unfit and fascist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Nah, the voters at best are uneducated and bandwagoners led by cheap group emotional manipulation (which is much easier to do to someone lacking an education)

Remember everyone, we’ve gotta live with these people after Trump and Biden go to live on the farm. We don’t have the numbers to simplistically oppress them (wouldn’t work for long if we did), or the desire to wipe them out (which, why would we want to become them). So we better start prepping ourselves for continuing life as equal citizens with people who voted for Trump.

(Especially if we’re ever gonna get enough people on board with turning against actual ruiling class UwU)

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s a thought. And I’m happy to engage once they admit out loud that they were wrong to support a demented rapist fraud for president who was clearly incompetent. And, who tried to overthrow democracy.

Say that, and we’re back to talking again. Don’t and, well, lolno.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Sorry, but bad people are bad. It doesn’t matter how stupid they are if they’re already making life worse for others for stupid reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Trump is too preoccupied with grifting to say all this crazy shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ha - we wish! The infinite monkeys typing his babbling in his brain will absolutely get there. This guy is just not as mentally incapacitated, so he got there faster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Could be. Wouldn’t surprise me. Also possible the grifters are being replaced with true believers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Ironically, aren’t those the days where lynching was legal? Man, we have thee dumbest politicians.

permalink
report
reply
52 points

My wife literally said, “He gets to lose his rights first. Then we will talk.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

*most craven

He’s probably making 6 figures by saying these things. A lot of people decide to sell out their social grouping for hard cash, this Uncle Ruckus motherfucker is just doing it in public and in a little more blatant / attention grabbing fashion than usual.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’ve read this guy also says African Americans should pay reparations to whites for bringing them to the Americas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This guy is quoted several times as saying that it was the Republicans who fought for social change. I wish someone in the audience had the balls to ask, “when you say Republicans, are you talking about liberals or conservatives?”

He’s trying to take credit for liberal successes, while being in the conservative party. It’d be like if King Charles tried to take credit for the success of the Boston Tea Party because it was done by British colonists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Fuck I hate having to defend these assholes but if we’re going to call them out on their bullshit it needs to be accurate. The quote is slightly taken out of context because he was inexplicably trying to dodge a question that wasn’t presented to him.

He is IMO trying to say I want to go back to the period of time when women couldn’t vote because back then people actually fought for those rights. That’s a dumbass circular argument but I don’t think he is actually saying he thinks women shouldn’t vote.

Hang the things they actually mean to say around their neck, not stupid slips of the tongue.

All that said - fuck this guy and fuck Huffington post for their shitty articles.

permalink
report
reply
52 points

Fuck I hate having to defend these assholes but if we’re going to call them out on their bullshit it needs to be accurate. The quote is slightly taken out of context because he was inexplicably trying to dodge a question that wasn’t presented to him.

Take a look at the rest of the stuff he’s been known for saying. From the article:

  • “The only thing worse than a woman who doesn’t know her place, is a man who doesn’t know his,” he wrote on Facebook in December 2017.
  • He also wrote, “I am REALLY sick of feminism and feminist. They are just as bad, if not worse, than racist.”
  • There’s plenty more to revisit with Robinson’s attacks on women, including calling them “whores,” “witches” and “rejected drag queens.”
  • There’s also his record of quoting Adolf Hitler, fanning Islamophobia, saying trans people should be arrested for using bathrooms, casting doubts on the Holocaust and spreading countless dangerous conspiracy theories.

Sure, he was trying to dodge a “gotcha” question, but his answer falls right in line with what he’s been saying for years anyway. His statement is completely in line with his other stated beliefs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

"The only thing worse than a woman who doesn’t know her place, is a man who doesn’t know his,” he wrote on Facebook in December 2017.

Perhaps I need to get my eyes checked, but… Isn’t he black? I shudder to think what a black man “knowing his place” in NC meant just a handful of years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Exactly. When these people tell you who they really are, believe them. They’re not lying, they’re not joking, they’re not confused.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is only the beginning with this guy. I’m not going to list any of it, but he said some absolutely awful things about many women, including Michelle Obama, Hilary Clinton, Oprah, Taylor Swift, AOC, Pelosi, and at least 15 other public figures. 😳

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Ok so in the larger picture this is probably exactly what he wants, but I still stand by my statement for this particular case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And when you take it in context you now have to wonder why he’s not a democrat or independent if fighting for social improvement is so important to him

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 471K

    Comments