211 points

In case you didn’t want to go into the article.

  • Trump Park Avenue, New York, N.Y.
  • Trump Tower, New York, N.Y.
  • 40 Wall Street, New York, N.Y.
  • Seven Springs, Westchester County, N.Y.
  • Trump International Hotel and Tower, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida
  • Trump National Golf Club Westchester, Briarcliff Manor, N.Y.
  • Trump National Golf Club Charlotte, Mooresville, North Carolina
  • Trump National Golf Club Colts Neck, Colts Neck, New Jersey
  • Trump National Golf Club, Washington, D.C., Sterling, Virginia
  • Trump National Golf Club Hudson Valley, Hopewell Junction, N.Y.
  • Trump National Golf Club Jupiter, Jupiter, Florida
  • Trump National Golf Club Los Angeles, Rancho Palos Verdes, California
  • Trump National Golf Club Philadelphia, Pine Hill, New Jersey -Trump International Golf Links Scotland (Aberdeen)
  • Trump International Golf Links Scotland (Turnberry)
permalink
report
reply
124 points
*

The cool thing is she’s probably going to have to take all of them because they’re all leverage to the tits and his ownership stake in them is worth almost nothing. lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Trump Steaks?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Lol, fixed

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

One hockey puck topped with ketchup, please.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Worst cut of them all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Interesting. If the government seizes properties that have been borrowed against, the government has to pay those loans? Can’t just cancel them or anything? Then you’re right and they might be worth a pittance. Especially after the over-inflating fraud. I wonder if Trump was able to get loans based on their fraudulent amounts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

No. The state gets what part he still owns— Trump still owes the debts. If it ends up Trump really has nothing and, after seizing all of his real estate and investments, it still doesn’t amount to what he owes the state, Trump will have to declare personal bankruptcy. At that point, all of his assets will go up for sale and all his debt consolidated and managed, and all of his income will be garnished until his debt is paid off.

This may, in fact, be what happens. Just like Rudy Giuliani and Alex Jones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

If a property is seized the government only gets the equity that the owner had in it so if Trump owns a 2B in property but owes 1.5B then the government may seize all 2B in order to satisfy the debt he owes the government. Worse the government will try to get as much value as possible but the value realized by a short term sale may be less than could have been realized had the customer had time to find the appropriate buyer. So if they only get 300M they can seize additional properties to satisfy the debt.

Nobody in their right mind wants the government doing this for them instead of mortgaging and or selling their own stuff. He committed such obvious fraud he should have known the jig was up when it went to trial and started seeking buyers or mortgaging. They could have self funded an appeal bond hoping to reduce the damages and prepared for worst case losing it all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Not the government directly, from my understanding the loan payment comes from the sale amount, before it is applied to the judgment. The property would end up being sold, then minus any outstanding debts on the property, and the remainder applies towards the judgment.

Outstanding loans must still be repaid, creditors don’t get screwed just because it’s part of a court judgment and seizure, in fact they get an immediate return. Depending on the loan agreement, if there are prepayment penalties for those loans… those would likely apply as well.

So it is technically possible it seems, with Trump’s fraudulent property valuations for loans, that he could end up with a negative overall return by selling various highly leveraged property. If they fraudulently valued something at say $600M and got a loan for $500M based on that… but the property is actually valued and sells for $300M, that loan would be underwater, like millions of American homes. He would still owe $200M for that loan, but would no longer have the property.

If all of his properties are massively overvalued and highly leveraged against, he could end up with basically nothing left from this. Forced to declare personal bankruptcy and losing all the real estate. Court judgments for fraud very rarely can be discharged by bankruptcy, so while other debts might be discharged the penalties will likely all apply, regardless.

I believe the sales would count as income for tax purposes next year as well. Just to be another kick in the nuts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

Take the golf courses first, I think that would piss him off the most.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points
*

Nah, Mar-a-lago first

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

I’m surprised it’s on the list. Happily surprised, of course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

But then he’d be homeless! And we all know how unhoused people are treated in Florida.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Mar-a-lago IS a golf resort…

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Added bonus there are probably lots of top-secret documents floating around in that golf course

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There’s probably top secret documents floating around a lot of his golf courses….

“Caddy, go see what’s blocking the 8th hole…”

“Sir, it appears to be a bunched up partial list of CIA operatives in Egypt.”

“Well, remove it! I’m under par. Mulligan!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

In his ex-wifes casket, you mean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

All the golf courses, including Bedminster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida

Holy shit. I’ve figured it out. I’ve cracked the master plan.

“Um, excuse me, stolen classified documents piled high to the rafters in my bathroom? I believe that’s the New York attorney general’s bathroom, athankyouverymuch. Case dismissed!”

This makes the fairly generous assumption that the man is capable of planning, but whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Genius play by Master Trump.

“Officer, there’s no way I shot that man. Because my gun is currently in the evidence room. Also check fucking mate. (Drops mic, dabs, makes out with the hottest cop and wheelies out)”

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

OMG OMG OMG

I would so LOVE to see his name stripped off of all those properties! …but I’m still trying to not get my hopes up. Aside from him suffering through court cases and losing them in a very public way, if his properties get seized it would be the first REAL consequences he receives

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Depending on the contract the properties might still have to keep the name even if sold. There’s a couple cases of that our there currently for Trump buildings. He sold them and they have to keep the name, last thing I heard they were trying to sue to remove the name because of all the bad publicity the trump name brings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If Donald sells them he can put whatever he likes in the contract. If the government sells them I doubt they’ll be encumbered with bullshit like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Rename them all Drumph, just to give him an aneurysm. When he drops dead rename them after John Brown, MLK Jr, Malcom X, er al.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Mao Zedong Tower

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He also owns a golf course in Ireland, or his name is on it. Trump Doonbeg

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You left out Trump International Hotel in Chicago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That’s just the excerpt from the article. Unsure why others aren’t listed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Maybe he just licenses his fine name and likeness (bleach)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hopefully the new owners all rename them to Drumpf

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

So if these properties are seized and mortgaged to the hilt, he’s still responsible for the balance owed, isn’t he?

Ahahahahahaha!

permalink
report
reply
21 points

I wouldn’t think so. I would think they’d seize properties base on only the equity, not the total mortgaged value. Likely why this list is so large, so little equity in any of the properties so more need to be seized to meet the total balance of the judgment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Oh yes he is on the hook for the rest. If Jared won’t use some of his 2 billion he got from the Saudi, then Trump goes bankrupt… again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So…you do think so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

So…you do think so.

No…? I’m not sure how you got that. I think the confusion in communication goes back to @Pronell@lemmy.world 's statement. Let me introduce my additional understanding there. They said the following, note my addition:

So if these properties are seized and mortgaged to the hilt, he’s still responsible for the balance owed [on the mortgages], isn’t he?

So to restate my position:

No, I do not believe so. I don’t think if the court took a $10million property with a $9million mortgage on it (meaning $1million in equity), I do NOT believe Trump would still owe the outstanding $9 million mortgage. The court would have the equity AND the debt, and would sell off the property keeping the equity and paying the lender the outstanding balance.

Further, lets say for easy math the judgment was only $5 million. Lets also assume that there were 5 identical properties with value, mortgage, and equity. I believe the court would take 5 properties which would equal the $5 million in equity which would equal the $5 million in the judgement.

Does that add clarity?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If the properties are seized, they’ll be sold, not mortgaged, and that amount of money will be applied to what is owed, I believe.

It’s often better for people to sell the property themselves first, because a court officer overseeing the sale doesn’t care as much about getting the highest possible sale price.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

I thought he was a genius billionaire guys

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Art of the deal!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Art of the squeal!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Art of the meal

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Fart of the veal

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

This at the bottom of the article made me laugh so hard. Somehow the maga trolls are butthurt enough to think this constitutes far left.

permalink
report
reply
37 points
*

It starts there until you rate it. I’ve seen it a couple times now. It’s just bad design.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Oh that seems like a decision not a mistake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Am dev, it is certainly a decision

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Notice the needle isn’t actually on the gauge: it’s not showing a result and doesn’t until you rate it yourself. Absolutely terrible design, though. I thought it said “unfair far left” too

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Damn that is sketchy design… Thanks for the info.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

after all that… he still has to pay back the ~90million to the chubb group when he eventually loses that appeal.

delicious

permalink
report
reply
8 points

No, for that he already provided a juicy pack of securities that he provided in the hope they would also do the new bond secured by real estate.

The bond provider basically pulled the self-proclaimed “business genius” straight over the table. I expect him to lose the appeal, which would cost Trump way more than just USD91M.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 473K

    Comments