The 1994 James Cameron film True Lies starring Arnold Schwarzenegger was recently re-released in Ultra HD 4K disc format giving viewers the opportunity to watch these classic films in unprecedented detail.

Not only True Lies but Cameron’s The Abyss and sci-fi classic Aliens were also released on Ultra HD Blu-ray with Geoff Burdick, senior vice president of Lightstorm Entertainment, who tells The New York Times that he thinks they “look the best they’ve ever looked.”

But not everyone agrees.

“It just looks weird, in ways that I have difficulty describing,” the journalist Chris Person tells The Times. “It’s plasticine, smooth, embossed at the edges. Skin texture doesn’t look correct. It all looks a little unreal.”

35 points

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Or even

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

This reminds me of arachnophobia mode in Grounded. Harvophobia filter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Steve Harvey at home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Personally I think the example shot in the thumbnail looks worse after being “enhanced.” Arnold’s hair was a dead giveaway, shit just looks weird.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Came here to say exactly that. Tom Arnold also just looks plastic in the “enhanced” one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s a freeze-frame of a high-speed action sequence with motion blur. You almost certainly wouldn’t notice in that second shot. Maybe in the first, which was a slower tracking shot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

That’s true.

I think my biggest gripe with it is that it looks like when I abruptly change my smart bulbs from warm white to cold white. lol. It’s jarring and unpleasant at first and definitely takes a minute or five to adjust to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The fabric on their suits also looks weird!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This is like early CGI effects in film. Some of those effects are the worst in film history (see Reptile from Mortal Kombat), and some were so good that we don’t even know CGI was used (See helicopters in Black Hawk Down). This is a new technology which is going to be abused majorly in tons of notable cases and we probably won’t notice the instances where it was used successfully.

The tech is clearly not sophisticated enough at this point to reliably enhance film images realistically. However, this technology at this stage of development would probably be excellent for old animation or films whose originals have been severely deteriorated.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Now wait for Gen A to grow up and start using bad AI smoothing as a desirable retro effect, like vinyl crackle, tape hiss or obvious autotune on vocals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Looks like one of those paintings that are almost real. I don’t know what they are called, but damn.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I think you mean hyperrealism:

https://www.artsy.net/gene/hyperrealism

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thank you :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m sure to make their point the authors chose some of the more egregious examples as stills for this article but godamn that really does look like shit. What were they thinking? It doesn’t even sound like a cost saving measure if the original negatives exist. The purported reasoning around it not being about the condition of the negatives but instead an opoortunity to improve on the original doesn’t make sense because you’d at the very least want to start with the original negs before “improving” the film and this phrasing makes it sound like they didn’t and considering the still in this article, it looks like they didn’t either. The way they describe the use of the technology maybe could be a net positive at some point, but this sure doesn’t seem to be an example of that. Did they just not have access to the negs or something? Was there some bizarre licensing arrangement that prevented them from doing this the traditional way? This looks so much more like an elaborate working around an obstacle rather than an even better than ideal value add kind of move. Like, if somehow all prints and copies of the film in existence disappeared except an old VHS this would be an admirable and impressive way to get to from that to a UHD release, but as a first choice option it seems like madness. It seems pointless to do this now until the tech is literally a superior result to a new remaster from the original film.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

The long term goal is having an automated process to restore old films cheaply since doing it manually is a long process that requires expertise. A limited talent pool for a time intensive process is the obstacle they are trying to overcome.

They are not thinking about it from the viewer’s perspective, just how they can market that they did technically restore it with something that is passable as a quality improvement in the eyes of the majority of buyers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What Peter Jackson did with They Shall Not Grow Old was great and efforts like that to actually restore old films should be supported, but movies from the 80s don’t need it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There are plenty of films from every decade that would benefit from a good quality remaster, especially for HD.

Sure, there is also a ton of crap that aren’t a priority, but that has always been true.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Entertainment

!entertainment@beehaw.org

Create post

Movies, television and Broadway.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 161

    Monthly active users

  • 503

    Posts

  • 2K

    Comments