216 points

I can’t believe this is the one thing this congress has actually managed to do. We just want healthcare

permalink
report
reply
63 points

I want both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Healthcare!?! Who needs healthcare when Congress is giving us our god given freedom of domestic surveillance capitalism, which is the freedomist freedom that ever freedomed, you filthy communist!

So anyway, I started violating civil liberties… PEW PEW

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

You’ll take your overpriced medicine from your out of network pharmacy and you’ll like it. At the fake markup price. And good luck getting that ultrasound, they’re going to code the billing wrong so instead of it being $40 it’s $1000. That’s freedom talking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And good luck getting that ultrasound, they’re going to code the billing wrong so instead of it being $40 it’s $1000.

🎶 Ain’t that America! Home of the free baby! 🎶

Bald eagle screeches

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You pick up what Uncle Sam is throwing down!

permalink
report
parent
reply
156 points

I wonder how many of these lawmakers will be invested in the company that swoops in and saves the American public?

permalink
report
reply
60 points

For real. You know Pelosi is already investing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

If she’s investing at the same time you’re getting the information, she missed the best time to buy. She might have hedged her bets and bought early

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Fun fact: Congresspeople can legally inside trade, but the rest of us cannot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

For sure they’re already in way before general public

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Pathetic watching ancient, feeble rich people about to return to the dust from whence they came still frantically positioning to boost their ego scores.

It’s as if they believe their preferred invisible sky mommy/daddy will accept a bribe of earthly currency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I would rather chill in my basement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

it’s an addiction

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Don’t worry everyone, it’s just pelosi’s 3rd cousin doing the investing so that makes everything totally cool and totally legal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Congressional Representatives and Senators are shielded from most insider trading laws. She could literately buy in, flip the SEC the bird, and go on her merry way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Well, as it is what her husband did for a living his entire very successful life, but sure the Lady you don’t like is wrong for him doing his job well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

A. Her husband is not a lawmaker. B. I’m sure her position helps C. Don’t simp for politicians. They DGAF about you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m pretty sure I could be incredibly successful at trading stocks as well if I was married to a Senator who could give me inside information, lmao.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Mnuchin (fmr Trump Treasury Sec) is already setting up a group to try and buy it apparently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*

The company behind tik tok said they will not sell they America is only 20% of their global market. They have refused to give their source code.

So guess app just won’t work in US. Dumb ass lawmakers only people this hurt are the US citizens that are using it to make money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I’d counter that basing your livelihood on an app that harvests your and your viewers data for an adversarial government known to use this kind of data in psyops isn’t a sound business idea.

In fact, I’d say this bill actually protects American users who have been using the app.

If TikTok can’t prove that they use our data responsibly, and refuse to do so to the point of just leaving the market, we are all better off. Another company will fill that void and content creators have endless options to move to.

I don’t think “but people need to make money while our data is harvested and provided to a government that uses it against us” is a great argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

It’s never been to protect the public. If that were the case, the law wouldn’t apply to just TikTok and foreign companies. They would’ve passed something to protect us from our own domestic data brokers too, but they didn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They passed the bill because someone is getting a cut. It isn’t to protect the public. If they wanted to protect the public we would have universal healthcare and a ban on guns.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Another company will fill that void

Yay, more YouTube and Instagram. What we always wanted. Can’t wait to have maybe one day Meta and Alphabet will combine so we can only have one service!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s not how due process and liberal democracy works. The government has to prove you’re doing it. Setting any precedent that you have to prove you’re not doing something (an impossible task) is incredibly dangerous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

It’s cute how you think that the only government that’s using our own data against us is china. Might want to step back and look at our own government, then apply your same line of thinking to all big tech companies in existence right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

So guess app just won’t work in US

The good ending

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Except you can just…VPN to almost any country on the planet

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Passing a law to give the executive branch overreaching censorship authority over the internet while simultaneously campaigning that the other option in the next election wants to use the power of that office to overthrow democracy. This is the “good ending”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

All the folks quoting what a small part of their audience the US is, never mention what percentage of their gross the US is. CCP won’t pay for eyeballs in Azerbaijan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The company behind tik tok said

China. It’s China that “said”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In the U.S., we have given our third-party Trusted Technology Provider access to the code that drives the content you see - the For You feed - and we are on a path to allowing an unprecedented amount of third-party access to verify our source code and systems, something no other peer company has done.

https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/ensuring-a-safe-authentic-space-during-times-of-conflict

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I don’t see how anyone is hurt by losing access to Tiktok. The only sad part about this is that all social media isn’t banned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You are literally posting this to social media right now. Do you think it would be cool to ban or force a sale of Lemmy to a US corp?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You are on social media. You can leave any time, that was always allowed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You joke but this has a chilling effect on all sm platforms based outside of the US. They just took a massive shit on the 1st amendment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points

Healthcare? Nah, let’s fight about it for decades and never give people anything meaningful. Education? Nah, let’s make our people go neck deep into debt and still fight about it for decades. Ban TikTok? Hold my bribery, you got it. Gimme 24 hours and you got it, boss.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

We can’t solve real issues because then we couldn’t keep the American populace overworked, sick, and unable to fight back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You don’t want healthcare. Because we said so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

Its all to get around passing a real privacy law with teeth.

permalink
report
reply
57 points

lmao, they don’t want a real privacy law, they want to have a monopoly in spying on Americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not only that, they want to have a monopoly on on what kind of media content gets delivered to americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Why do bots! Love exclamation marks! So much!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

CCPA (in California) is a good first step. Ideally something similar should be enacted for the entire country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

Just as a reminder, we have been ‘fighting for 15’ since 2012. But when it comes to leveraging foreign companies with bans to force them to sell to US oligarchs we can move at blazing speed through the least functional congrss in recent history. There are two very different Americas depending on how much money you have.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Least functional Congress in recent history

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 408K

    Comments