115 points

I’m struggling with everything on this article. On the one hand anytime a hostage has been freed, that’s good news. On the other, at what cost. 40 000 dead. That’s the easy stat. Amputations are also incredibly high. Most of them kids and performed without anesthetic. This is the first time the IDF has rescued hostages. So I’m sitting here with my initial feeling of ‘oh, that’s good news’ ,and then I think about the wider picture and context, and it doesn’t seem so good anymore.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

And half a dozen months ago they could have had a ceasefire to have them released, along with the ones that STILL aren’t released.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Nah, that was the one that Egypt fucked up. There had not been an actual agreed upon hostage transfer since the first one. Hamas also won’t give actual information on the hostages. This whole thing is just war crimes the whole way down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

“we don’t negotiate with terrorists” and that stance is “non-negotiable.” If only these terrorists would just stop and do what we want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Well from the other side the IDF are the terrorists, since they’re terrorising Gaza indiscriminately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

So you think we should negotiate with terrorists? Give them something to make them stop what they’re doing today, and they definitely won’t commit more terrorism later in the hope of getting more things later.

Maybe just stick to eating ass, Adam.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I wouldn’t negotiate with Israel either

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Three months ago the IDF also rescued 3 hostages by killing many civilians. They bomb entire neighbourhoods to rubble as a distraction mechanism for their teams to go in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

They bomb entire neighbourhoods to rubble as a distraction mechanism for their teams to go in.

Those human shields had it coming. /S or I guess they’re human bait now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Imagine how much resources hamas spent on keeping these hostages and how many lives could be saved if they just released them all before the ground operation was started.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Netanyahu said since November that even if all hostages were released he was going to invade anyway and not stop the war.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Even more reason to release them all then, and I’m appalled by how hamas was that stupid to not realize that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Just think about how many lives could have been saved if Israel worked towards a two state solution

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just think about how many lives could have been saved if Israel worked towards a two state solution cared about human lives

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Yeah. October 7 surely didn’t make them start working on that, did it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-37 points

Maybe the Palestinians themselves devalue their own lives compared to Israeli lives. Just look at when they agreed to a ceasefire and traded hostages for prisoners: each hostage was worth multiple prisoners released by Israel.

This is also noticeable when Hamas use their own population as human shields, exemplified by when they hide their soldiers and weapons in hospitals and schools. Or when they blend in with civilians on purpose by not using any combatant uniform like the IDF do. They really don’t care for their own civilians. These are only useful for acting as human shields and, if they’re killed or injured, strike a pose for NatGeo-style photos in their attempts to appeal to western sentiment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Maybe the Palestinians themselves devalue their own lives compared to Israeli lives.

What the fuck

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Maybe the Palestinians themselves devalue their own lives compared to Israeli lives.

You should just stop right there. If your logic depends on saying “they actually don’t value their lives as much as others” then please stop and ask “what the hell is wrong with yourself?”. People who think like this probably value their life least of all. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*

When I see how easily the Hamas uses their own population as sacrifices, I have doubts they really value their lives. Remember: the Gazan population elected the Hamas with more than 60% of the votes. It’s not too farfetched to say a significant part of the Gazans think like the Hamas in terms of sacrifice, and by extension, how they value their lives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I could be wrong, but I haven’t seen any independent verification that Hamas has been using hospitals and schools for bases, but I’m positive that there’s been debunked Israeli reports that schools and hospitals have been used as Hama’s bases.

Same thing for human shields. IDF admits to using Palestinians as shields. To my knowledge, there’s no Hamas equivalent.

This ‘war’ isn’t about Hamas anyways. If it was, there wouldn’t be 1000 people killed in the west bank. Hamas isn’t in the west bank. Why is the IDF letting people kill Palestinians in the west bank?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Likewise, there’s no independent verification when the Hamas minister of healthcare periodically announces the number of casualties, but the media tends to take it at face value as it was the crystalline truth. When this is most likely an inflated number to keep Israel in the worst light possible, and to exert political pressure for the USA to stop supporting Israel with weapons of war. It’s all with the intent of the Hamas getting away with it.

The Hamas has a history of lying and deception in order to support the narrative in their favor.

There’s the incident of Hamas accusing Israel of bombing an hospital last year, which the media widely reported as truth before checking, but in the end it was in a building a block away from the hospital. Since this embarrassment the media has been more careful before confirming anything coming from Hamas official sources.

Also the Hamas had a guy that multitasked as an News Reporter, Combatant, Healthcare Professional, Bloodied Victim. This was reported in social media, a guy from Hamas appearing in photos doing all those things in different occasions. Give this guy an Oscar already!

The Hamas does not hesitate to manipulate facts to confirm their intended narrative. Their track record is tarnished at this point. But, to be honest, an organization that takes hostages as a leverage to negotiate a ceasefire in a war they themselves started, from this point it was already very clear they’d do anything to achieve their goals. From using civilians as human shields to lying without shame, these things are just the cherry on top of the heinous acts they committed as the catalyst of the war. They were not trustworthy from the start.

And what you say about “IDF using Palestinians as shields” makes no sense. That’s what the Hamas do, actually. The Hamas see their civilians as disposable sacrifice for a religious end. If an IDF soldier took a Palestinians civilian literally as a human shield in order to avoid being shot by a Hamas militant, the militant would shoot both of them without hesitation, because they see their civilians as sacrifices in a religious sense. Just an addendum, the Islamic State leaders used to say “we love death like you love life” as a point of comparison of the radical islamic worldview compared to the western worldview. That’s the kind of thinking that drives the Hamas, and that’s why they’re not ashamed to call for the extermination of all Jews as if it’s the most normal thing in the world.

About the deaths in the West Bank, I’m not too knowledgeable about this to comment further.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Fuck of Nazis scum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points

It’s curious they always highlight the

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_white_woman_syndrome

I’m glad more hostages are free, but for me it doesn’t sit well the result… 200 people dead to save 4. At least the IDF are improving, luckily this time they didn’t kill the hostages.

Who is organizing these rescue operations? Homelander?

permalink
report
reply
30 points

But to the IDF the 200 people killed weren’t people. So the math maths.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Yup, see the person below you saying almost exactly that in more clinical - but clearly sincere - terms.

Edit: When I say they are “sincere” that is not to say there is any merit to what they are saying. I’m pointing out that they actually believe this garbage is justification for the mass slaughter of children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Hamas is already willing to agree to the US peace plan, so the only thing preventing the rest of the hostages making it to their homes is political will, and with much less risk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Are semitic people white? If so, so are the Arabs.

Hamas kidnap kills then kidnap a bunch of israeli people hide them among civilians and within even their refugee camps IDF frees some of them Lots of civilian casualties Pro-Pal peeps, oh no, look what the IDF did

I’m glad the hostages were saved, and can’t wait for hamas to lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Israel is committing war crimes, so of course it is white, duh!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This echo chamber doesn’t want to hear about the fact that Hamas is a murderous terror group that intentionally endangers Palestinian civilians to further its religious and political cause.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Because it is victim blaming bullshit to justify the genocide against Palestinians. Whatever Hamas is doesn’t justify the atrocities committed by Israel especially since Oct. 7 but also the Decades before. Did you know more than 500 Palestinians were murdered in the Westbank since Oct. 7? There is no Hamas there, but now that the Israeli fascists can get away with it, they enjoy their impunity as they murder, rape and pillage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So you’re fine with 200+ dead civilians to save 4 hostages?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

🎵Natalie Holloway. That angel!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s only 200 people. How many people am I worth? 200 kidnappers? 199kidnapers and I kid? 198 kidnappers, 2 kids, 3 moms, 5 elders and cousin Vinny? Couldn’t they just get the victims out and catch the kidnappers instead?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They even lost one of their own soldiers in the process

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And killed 3 other hostages in the massacre

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Obviously it’s good to minimize collateral damage and casualties wherever possible. But I see no issue with this result.

If a country values the lives of their citizens they will rescue them and spill any blood needed. Conversely, a nation that values its cut will try to minimize the harm that could come to them and keep hostages far from where they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I agree, Hamas is a criminal terrorist organization that does not value the lives of Palestinians. I mean a criminal terrorist organization hiding hostages amongst civilians in a heavily populated area they are worse than the example you gave because they intentionally put those civilians at risk of harm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

If a terrorist holds hostages in amongst hundreds of INNOCENT PEOPLE it’s fine to massacre them all. When you could have just got all your hostages released by accepting peace. Cool moral compass you have there

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

If it was my family or countrymen being held then absolutely the military should do what is necessary to secure their release.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What if Hamas is spilling blood because they value their citizens and land?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

because they value their citizens

Hiding hostages in a highly populated residential area, without any means of self defense or even evacuation safe zones, is not called valuing the citizens. It’s called using them as leverage, something terrorists love doing to civilians.

What did the spilling of blood on oct.7 did to Palestinians? Make them live in hell for over 8 months? Make thousands die? And for what, for massacring Israelis? What do you think Hamas has done in oct.7 that would make you think they “value their citizens” - coz to me it only looks like they just wanna kill jews.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

What do you mean? Of course they do. It’s not a contradiction, because they are adversaries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points
*

Great news. Not sure if genocide of the Gaza population is necessary for that.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

It is not.

This article doesn’t mention if anyone was killed in the raid, Hamas or civilians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
9 points

Israeli forces returned fire, including with airstrikes, he said. An Israeli special forces commander was killed during the operation, a police statement said.

Just casually bombing city areas jfc

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

[Israel rescues 4 hostages in raid Gaza officials say killed over 200 ] (https://edition.cnn.com/middleeast/live-news/israel-hamas-war-gaza-news-06-08-24?ref=upstract.com)

Edit: the number is now 274 Palestinians killed in this operation:

How an Israeli raid freed 4 hostages and killed at least 274 Palestinians in Gaza

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Holocaust? Wasn’t ‘genocide’ drastic enough anymore?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*

I know right? I’ve always thought calling it genocide a flagrant exxageration. When I think of genocide, it comes to mind images of some evil dictator using poison gas in a population, chemical weapons, an atomic bomb, etc.

To be a true genocide, it must be an indiscriminate elimination of the population of a nation or an ethnicity. It’s not the case of Isreal, which is targeting specifically the militants of Hamas. Just because there are civilian colateral damage in the process does not make it a genocide automatically, because the civilians are not what the IDF is after. They’re after Hamas militants. Gaza has a very high population density, and the Hamas militants don’t use any uniform to differentiate them from the civilians. They do it on purpose to make the IDF hesitant, and get them by surprise. They hide themselves in buildings that they know the IDF would be hesitant to attack, like hospitals, schools and mosques. They play dirty, and then cry genocide when the IDF respond to their missiles sent to Israel’s territory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

When I think of genocide, it comes to mind images of some evil dictator using poison gas in a population, chemical weapons, an atomic bomb, etc.

That’s just lack of education on your part, though. Neither the Cambodian Genocide nor the Rwandan Genocide would be a genocide according to you, but in reality these were two of the worst genocides in the last 50 years.

Come to think of it, neither would the Bosnian Genocide according to you, because it mainly targeted males for execution.

then cry genocide

The people who are “crying genocide” are those of us in the international community who know what a geenocide is, including experts in international law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m glad you’re the UN with the internationally agreed definition.

Oh. Wait.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

they could have had all the hostages if they didn’t reject the ceasefire proposal…

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Do you have any credible sources where Hamas made that promise? Because from what have read they never wanted to agree to releasing them

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

the death toll of the operation is up to 274 palestinians and 3 hostages now.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

They never really understood the Trolly Problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“We’re gonna need a second trolley!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Zero. US Special forces are not involved in this. You keep spreading that lie which earns you a temp ban.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 219K

    Comments