4 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It placed the call over a cellular network using the 3GPP Immersive Video and Audio Services (IVAS) codec, allowing callers to hear “sound spatially in real-time.”

The IVAS codec is part of 5G Advanced, an upcoming upgrade to 5G networks that could offer faster speeds, improved energy efficiency, more accurate cellular-based positioning, and more.

Currently, all phone calls made over a cellular network are monophonic, meaning audio is compressed into a single channel.

Spatial audio, on the other hand, makes it seem like sounds are coming from different directions as they’re delivered through multiple channels.

The IVAS codec could enable spatial audio in a “vast majority” of smartphones with at least two microphones, Nokia tells Reuters.

But, as pointed out by Reuters, we likely won’t see the more immersive audio and video calls on our cellular networks for a few more years.


The original article contains 228 words, the summary contains 142 words. Saved 38%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Useless.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Incorrect. This will better train LLMs since they can detect distinct speakers/sounds more easily and thus applying the proper metadata tags and profile information at a more accurate clip.

All so they can deliver more ads!

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I wish it was only useless:(

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

<.< I’m assuming this is a joke, but feel the need to point out to the ones who don’t realize… LLMs aren’t trained on audio recordings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not everything that will be useful has an immediately obvious benefit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The only benefit this has is to those who will upcharge to use it. It’s pointless crap nobody asked for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
90 points

oh look, a feature literally no one asked for or needs.

permalink
report
reply
52 points

90% of the features in your daily life started as something no one asked for or needed. I remember people saying this about touch screens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

In some applications, people still say that about touch screens and they are not wrong.

Spatial Audio can be cool. In this application? I’m unconvinced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Fucking touchscreens on cars is definitely something nobody should have access to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

90%?

[Citation needed]

permalink
report
parent
reply

Was anyone asking for the telegraph before it was invented? Or the telephone? Or the Internet? Or smartphones? Or social media?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I totally wouldn’t be surprised if there originally were people being like “So what’s this so-called ‘cupboard’ supposed to solve? Why isn’t a regular shelf good enough for you?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t necessarily endorse the viewpoint of Noel Gallagher but it is pretty funny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I don’t care about Spatial Audio for phone calls, but for songs and podcasts it’s AMAZING. It’s a gimmick, sure, but it’s really fucking neat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

about as necessary as 3-d televisions, which are also very neat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I agree with you fully, but Spatial Audio is waaaay cooler than 3D TVs, and yes I did watch Avatar on a 3D TV on acid

But I really really have fun with audio. Also it’s not horridly expensive. While I’m working, I’m constantly looking around and hearing how different things are. When I had my partner try, they were like “wait can you hear this?” because it sounds like such a realistic concert performance. Artists I’ve never listened to are fascinating to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Nokia implemented stereo sound? Wow, welcome to 1881.

Meanwhile, the vast majority of people making calls are still going to have only one speaker, so it’ll still get downmixed to mono. Even if your phone has two, and you’re not holding it next to one ear, they’re still going to be so close together as to effectively be one point source.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

This was true for TVs until it wasn’t.

Edit: apparently some young whippersnappers don’t know TVs used to be mono before they were stereo, and now some TVs even have spatial sound.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

i mean, people have innovated in the areas they care already.

no one really cares that much about audio on phone calls. as long as they’re understandable.

people added video because it adds to the communication. spatial audio will not. it will only become common if one or two of these mega corps decide to shoehorn it into ever device. not because people actually want it or care.

might be a lucrative patent if we ever get holograms though

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

i mean, people have innovated in the areas they care already

so you are saying that all the innovation and research should be stopped, because if we care about any specific problem, it is already solved, and if it isn’t, it is proof we don’t care? 😆

that… is not how it works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

… You realize this has been innovated because someone cares, right?

Like this is such a silly argument. “Why would we make cars not use steam? If people cared about it we would have already innovated!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

You think we haul 30" phones around in the foreseeable future?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No, clearly we walk around with full 5.1 surround sound speakers on poles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

You don’t need the tv for the surround sound, the speakers fit inside tiny devices you can put near each ear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can stream your video call to a TV right now, and spatial sound could help match the movement of the people on screen if the phone was stationary for a more immersive call.

No need to haul anything around, just some creative thinking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If only they had developed some kind of companion technology that connected to the phone and directed separate audio channels to each of your ears. Eh, such a specialized device could never gain widespread adoption if stereo phone calls were the only practical use case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Meanwhile, the vast majority of people making calls are still going to have only one speaker, so it’ll still get downmixed to mono. Even if your phone has two, and you’re not holding it next to one ear, they’re still going to be so close together as to effectively be one point source.

No, lots of (probably most) phones and other devices has stereo speakers.

Either way headphones are most often used for this (you know like the thumbnail)

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

Can’t wait to experience the tech support call center scams in Dolby Atmos.

permalink
report
reply
29 points
*

We’re calling about your cars extended warranty

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

In THX certified 7.2.1 surround straight out of Bangalore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Kitboga SURROUND SOUND? Sign me up

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 519K

    Comments