82 points

Oh but they promised! Darn. If only there was some way to regulate corporations.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

The FTC sent an angry letter, that will surely stop them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It was a pinky promise! You can’t break a pinky promise!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ah yes, a pinky promise. An unbreakable legal agreement between nobles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If only there was some way to regulate corporations.

It’s called the Sherman Antitrust Act, and it’s why this promise was made and why the FTC cares about it now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

But DO they really care about it? Or is this just to placate the plebs again?

I’ll know they care when they actually manage to do something about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

This FTC is incredibly aggressive. Lina khan is the head, a person who made waves in academia by basically redefining antitrust laws in the digital age, with a specific animus for Amazon. Shes led the FTC teeth forward:

During her tenure, the FTC has pushed to ban non-compete agreements, filed lawsuits against health care companies engaging in anti-competitive practices, and launched a high-profile lawsuit against Amazon.[3] In 2022, the FTC and the DOJ’s anti-trust division blocked a record number of mergers on anti-trust grounds.[4] ABC News described her as taking a more aggressive approach on anti-trust, and earning some conservative supporters during her confirmation and tenure.[1]

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I dunno. I was mostly just trying to explain why the federal government might care about video game pricing at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Isn’t this exactly what Chevron Deference was about? I don’t know how clearly defined the law actually is, but this seems like a prime case for the rubber stamp SCOTUS to jump on and say “actually according to a pig shit farmer from 9500bc the law was meant to mean that monopoly power is awesome.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Three companies that are shit and always have been why would you trust them? The US needs to break the backs of corporations now. Vote and write letters to Congress. It works, it always has. These companies deserve to get dragged through hot coals.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Citizens United changed all of that. Congress no longer has a backbone because they are now beholden to corporations. That Court decision did more to turn the US into an oligarchy than most anything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They should just start enforcing a upper limit in comporation size and start splitting monopolies when they grow too big

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

DNC & RNC enter the chat.

“Yeah right. Why do you think we exist? We don’t allow those kinds of people to get the support they need to win. We’re corporations for corporations.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Were there not contractual obligations with clear boundaries and penalties? Surely it wasn’t just a “promise”?

Never should have allowed the merger to begin with. Break them up. Everyone involved in the merger barred from working in the industry for life.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

“We had our fingers crossed!!! Haha!”

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

I’m shocked they’re shocked lol

permalink
report
reply

Gaming

!gaming@lemmy.zip

Create post

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

  • No NSFW content

You can see Lemmy.zip’s rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:

  • Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
  • Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
  • Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
  • Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
  • Collaboration: Whether you’re here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.

If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


Community stats

  • 2.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 9.2K

    Comments