37 points

While nationwide surveys give important signals of American support for political candidates, a handful of competitive states typically tilt the balance in the U.S. Electoral College, which ultimately decides who wins a presidential election.

The only poll that matters is in November

permalink
report
reply
11 points

True to an extent. Polls obviously don’t determine who’s going to win, but they can help campaigns adjust their strategies to hopefully pick up more votes in November.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

If that were the case, Biden would still be in the race. But his swing state polls were not getting better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But that’s the point. This is a national poll, not polling in swing states. It’s encouraging, but not necessarily predictive of victory.

It’s like telling someone who has more yards in a football game. Yards are a good indicator of success, but winners are decided on points. Some points might require fewer yards. Winning in Wyoming is like a field goal after the other team fumbles on their own 20. Republicans get a lot of those simply by being bigots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We need to eliminate the electoral college. It served its purpose and now it’s just a way to subvert democracy and negate the will of the majority of voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Add Kelly and she’ll gain more!

permalink
report
reply
25 points

The same poll puts her up by 2 additional points (42% to 38%) if RFK stays in the race (and makes it onto ballots).

When voters in the survey were shown a hypothetical ballot that included independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Harris led Trump 42% to 38%, an advantage outside the margin of error. Kennedy, favored by 8% of voters in the poll, has yet to qualify for the ballot in many states ahead of the Nov. 5 election.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Oh damn, am I now rooting for brain worms?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The enemy of my enemy is brain worms

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Brain worms to save America

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

He was making a deal with Trump to drop out at the RNC convention. Luckily his son decided to film it and post it online, so its likely off the table now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Idk man pretty sure the worm got to the part of his brain that has any sense of shame

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Guess I’m telling all of my Republican Maga-supporting customers that I’m voting for RFK. It’s easier to convince them to split their vote into RFK than it is to talk them into voting for a Democrat, because they’ve been brainwashed by their families. Lots of them have expressed kinda teetering on that edge, so I’m gonna just give 'em a li’l push.

If I could convince them to go all the way, I would - but getting them to split the ticket is the next best thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

If you believe this news, you can make quite some money betting on it

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Nah, it’s like 40/60 atm.

But, hey, why not? I’m getting out of this shit hole if Trump wins anyways. Bookie can hunt my ass in Deutschland if he dares.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

This is just starting. I’m always baffled by just how long it takes news to trickle into polling. You should expect her numbers to continue to gain for any where from two to three weeks out from this week. Most people are utterly tuned out and have been for a while, so it will take time.

A few other considerations as we watch her polling: Harris is getting real grass roots support. This is something Biden never had (barely in 2020, and very much not in 2024). Progressive groups are mobilizing now and the infrastructure is being set up as we speak, but Harris will have real advocacy at a grass-roots starting end of this week, and really coming online in another 2-4 weeks since it takes time to get set up, get volunteers, gets access to the van, etc.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

I honestly believe that Biden only won in 2020 because of how badly Trump fumbled covid. Biden just was never able to energize the base like you’re saying. Covid did the work of energizing people for him. Even in 2022 it wasn’t that the dems were well liked or Biden helped down the ticket, it was that Trump endorsed the worst possible candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Biden only won in 2020 because of how badly Trump fumbled covid

Oh 100%. And a dusty old boot could have beat him. Trump is and has always been an infinitely beatable candidate. Its just a matter of not running objectively weaker candidates like Hillary or Biden.

Biden won 2020 for two reasons: The DNC ratfucked Bernie in the primary (their words, not mine); and when it came time, Bernie was the bigger man and asked his constituents to support Biden in exchange for control of the platform (and the deal worked!).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Biden won the nomination because he kicked butt in the South so bad everybody else dropped out.

He always was kind of a weak candidate, but he won, and more importantly he made his win stick during the whole run up to the coup and after. He wasn’t in the news much then, but that took a cool head.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 442K

    Comments