12 points

We need to stop looking at minimum wage as a set number across the country, It creates a wage disparity for the working class. A livable wage in Alabama would not be a livable wage in California, a livable wage in California would be an insane wage in a place like Alabama.

The minimum wage needs to be directly tied with median housing costs either at the state level or at the county level. The wage needs to be set where housing would only comprise of a max of 30% of income. So at 30% if the median rent is $2000 per month, the livable wage in that area would be set at about $6700 a month, or about $42 an hour. This would help control housing costs as well as keep wages livable.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Suppose that happens. What’s stopping the landlords from just raising their rents then? Can the government control housing costs? Is it even possible in a “free” economy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

The government wouldn’t need to control housing. Landlords would be under pressure from other companies to keep housing low so their wage costs remain as low as possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Regardless, nobody can live on 7.25

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I acknowledge that, but people keep quitting a specific number and specific numbers don’t work across the nation. Because of varied COL. Minimum wage should be tied to a major COL item like housing

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oof. Rent is easily there in my city. And the minimum wage is… Umm… Not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

That’s why the 2 should be connected

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know if tying it to something that’s inflated above core inflation is a good idea. I think the better approach is to reduce the cost of housing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Minimum wage in California is $16. Berkeley it is $18.67

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The median required minimum livable wage in California for a single person with no children, according to MIT living wage calculator is $27.32

Even if it does get increased to $18, it’s not livable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No where near a livable wage

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

B-but Big Macs!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s probably more realistically possible to put some rent caps in than implement $42/hr minimum wage. Virtually all minimum wage employees would be laid off with all the businesses who employ them shutting down too. The only businesses that could survive that much dramatic increase in payroll costs would be the ones making really huge profits, which would almost certainly not include every restaurant in most cities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

You should have gone to school, you could’ve learned a trade But you laid in the bed where the bums have laid Now all the time you’re crying that you’re underpaid It’s like that (what?) and that’s the way it is Huh!

permalink
report
reply
-18 points

I love how this comment is getting voted down - truth hurts 😅😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Implying that laziness is the only possible cause for being on minimum wage isn’t truth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

It is so much easier placing the blame on “the system” rather than on the individual not raking responsibility for their lot. For the vast majority of cases you’re on £7 p/h because fundamentally you deserve to be. The market doesn’t reward failure or lack of ambition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

It’s a BIG factor…poor academic attainment is the driving force behind the majority of minimum wage jobs. If you’re smart and have drive you don’t work for $7 p/h.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

…IN… AMERICA.

do you people really forget about the other 200 nations?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

If you’re going to be pedantic, at least be correct. America is an entire continent, with over 30 countries. You’re referring only to the United States of America, a single country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

True dat!

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

I mean it’s NPR: an American public radio news outfit.

Why the fuck would they be concerned with the minimum wage in Tanzania?

Strike that, that’s actually precisely something NPR would probably cover lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

So put it in the post that it’s only for that country? Lol

American exceptionalism at its best!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

No

I don’t ask for articles about German politics to specifically say it’s about Germany, usually the German gives that away.

Your inability to pick up on context clues does not entitle you to compensation by everyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Literally the first sentence in this community’s sidebar

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*

For reference, the cost of living doubles every 25 to 30 years. $7.25 in 2024 is worth less than $5 in 2009 money. Less than the $5.15 that was the previous minimum wage.

permalink
report
reply
86 points

For the love of god, increase it to something reasonable then implement yearly increases based on inflation so that I never have to hear about this again.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

This or tie it to the average government wage of a member of Congress, they get a raise and the people get a raise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

They would slash their own salaries to $7.25 or less and enjoy the usual net pay raises from their billionaire donors and stock increases as a reward for keeping it that way.

And voters will cheer them on for being so selfless and suffering with the common man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Tie minimum wage to GDP/GNP, inflation, etc.

Tie congressional salaries to be a fixed multiple of minimum wage.

If congress wants more money, they have to make everyone’s situation better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s the best thing that can be negotiated in a collective agreement, after that you can finally work on negotiating things that aren’t salary related.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

CT actually does the annual increase based on inflation thing. It’s at $15.60-something currently I believe. It can be done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s something for sure, but if they took it back to the beginning and adjusted for inflation it would be $25+

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s absolutely wild that raising the minimum wage needs to be legislated every time. Other countries just appoint a body that has the authority to increase it every year based on XYZ, no legislation required.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 472K

    Comments