86 points

For the love of god, increase it to something reasonable then implement yearly increases based on inflation so that I never have to hear about this again.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

This or tie it to the average government wage of a member of Congress, they get a raise and the people get a raise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

They would slash their own salaries to $7.25 or less and enjoy the usual net pay raises from their billionaire donors and stock increases as a reward for keeping it that way.

And voters will cheer them on for being so selfless and suffering with the common man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Tie minimum wage to GDP/GNP, inflation, etc.

Tie congressional salaries to be a fixed multiple of minimum wage.

If congress wants more money, they have to make everyone’s situation better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

CT actually does the annual increase based on inflation thing. It’s at $15.60-something currently I believe. It can be done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s something for sure, but if they took it back to the beginning and adjusted for inflation it would be $25+

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s the best thing that can be negotiated in a collective agreement, after that you can finally work on negotiating things that aren’t salary related.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s absolutely wild that raising the minimum wage needs to be legislated every time. Other countries just appoint a body that has the authority to increase it every year based on XYZ, no legislation required.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

“Rose.”

$7.25 was unlivable 15 years ago.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

And by the time we get a $15/hr minimum wage, a living wage in any state worth living in will be $75/hr.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Which is exactly why I hated the “fight for fifteen” slogan… Great you got your $15 in some states 15 years later and now that’s worthless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Minimum wage should not be voted on by congress. It should be pegged to cost of living by region. The government already does all this measuring of cost of living by region. Make the minimum 125% of cost of living and be done with it. It’s clear congress can’t handle the task.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Make the minimum 125% of cost of living

Do the math for a 32 hour workweek to meet this criteria and make it so you have to include healthcare benefits proportional to the hours worked.

Ironically the company I work for would go under if they had to pay a living wage like this to the workers. We pay minimum wage in our state to close to 400 workers, almost all of whom cannot speak English today. It’s miserable manufacturing work but 100% required, the product is positive to humanity and can’t possibly be outsourced. Can be better automated though, which should be done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How’s life at the fleshlight factory? Thank you for your service, by the way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sure it would. No graft or overpayment management and ownership involved in the system at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Yeah, an hour of someone’s life is just worth less in the flyover shit states.

EDIT: Why don’t the worthless people in the flyover shit states want to vote for us?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The “low cost of living” in the “flyover states” is subsidized by a complete lack of accessible social services or government accountability.

You can get a house for a bit more than 100,000. But you’ll pay for it by sending your children to a school where your high schooler is being taught math by someone with a GED. Or when you lose a tire to a crater in the road. Or when a tornado hits your town and emergency services aren’t available because your Governor is in Paris and didn’t bother to tell anyone.

It’s really Galt’s Gulch here. The low cost of living/low pay works like a trap, because how the fuck can one save up to get out?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

No, but the same food and lodging costs drastically different based on location in this country. A New York City cost of living would bankrupt small businesses in rural Nebraska who also price their services based on regional costs. It’s just more logical than a flat minimum wage for the whole country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s how it used to work until WFHers realized they can make urban wages and live in the country; literally eating their cake and having it too

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s why it’s the MINIMUM wage. It isn’t saying places like New York City needs to pay that low, nor is it saying they can’t mandate higher.

It is saying that every person, anywhere, should at an absolute minimum, be offered this baseline.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

No, but the same food and lodging costs drastically different based on location in this country.

Rent’s going up everywhere. Lower wages for the states whose voters you regard with contempt is only going to create a permanent underclass of flyover Morlocks who will get hungry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s better than the current system of begging politicians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sarcasm I hope?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Very much so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

States and cities have higher ones already

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

A few do

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’d be dead in Va if I were making 7.25

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*

For reference, the cost of living doubles every 25 to 30 years. $7.25 in 2024 is worth less than $5 in 2009 money. Less than the $5.15 that was the previous minimum wage.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Put a little asterisk after that number, a lot of employees who earn tips can be paid even less.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

That’s truly inhumane. Even when I was a server - not America - I was paid the same wage as a line cook of similar experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

And Republicans are arguing to pay disabled people and children less.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think diisabled people can already get paid less, if they are receivingstate assistance. I don’t know how it works, but I had a retarded family member who lived in PA and he made like 1.25 an hour, which is still below minimum wage since this was nearly 2 decades ago. I know he received assistance in various ways, but it just seemed wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

K first part is bad but why are CHILDREN even part of the conversation

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They don’t make less just because they’re paid less by their employer. The minimum wage of how much they actually make is the same.

And as a result, servers in the US make a lot more than line cooks of similar experience. That wage gap is a source of frustration for cooks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And as a result, servers in the US make a lot more than line cooks of similar experience.

That’s heavily variable on where you work. High end restaurants with more expensive menu items and generous tippers pay better than the Sunday Service Waffle House crowd.

And different restaurants tip out differently. More egalitarian venues tend to pool tips, so line cooks get a slice of the tip out at the end of the day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

maybe. maybe not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

I see this mentioned a lot - and it’s not technically true I don’t think. If tips do not push their pay above the minimum wage per time worked, then they do in fact get paid out at minimum wage. Not that I’m here to defend a $7.75 $7.25 minimum wage - that’s an obvious problem. But AFAIK, a server who did terrible in tips is still taking $7.75 $7.25/hr home at the end of the pay period.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But their employer isn’t paying them minimum wage, regardless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s kind of a semantics argument I guess. Their employer is ensuring that they are taking home no less than minimum wage - because they are paying them up to minimum wage as necessary.

To properly address this would require fully overhauling our tipping culture and laws around pay for tipped workers, which sounds great to me as a consumer. But if you ask a waiter or bartender, many would MUCH rather leave things the way they are, because they make an absolute killing and taking 100% of pay from their employer would result in a substantial pay cut.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 472K

    Comments