You don’t need to be an expert in electoral politics to understand Rule One of any campaign: Candidates should pursue as many votes as possible. In a democracy, it’s common sense: The more votes a campaign has, the greater the chance of success.

With this in mind, Donald Trump appears to have a counterintuitive rhetorical habit. The New Republic noted:

On Fox News Thursday morning, Donald Trump had a weird instruction for his supporters: they don’t have to vote. “My instruction: We don’t need the votes, I have so many votes,” Trump said on Fox & Friends before going on a rant about how much support he has in Florida.

As a clip from the show makes clear, the former president didn’t appear to be kidding: https://x.com/atrupar/status/1816482779581775943

If the phrasing sounded at all familiar, it’s not your imagination. The day after last month’s presidential debate, for example, Trump held a rally in Virginia and told attendees, “We don’t need votes.”

217 points

They don’t need the votes because they have a plan in place to seize the power with undemocratic measures.

It’s all he’s been saying the last few weeks. If you listen to him, he says again and again, that they plan to abolish american democracy.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

ISTG if trump loses, incites another insurrection and we still don’t put him jail I don’t know what the point of it is anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

This is a common feeling with a lot of people. Not jailing rapists and other criminals just because their daddies were wealthy breaks down the social fabric. After all, if it’s everyone for themselves, why shouldn’t I steal from Walmart? Why should I not commit fraud against corps? Why should I not try and murder a presidential candidate?

The public not seeing that crimes against the social contract have consequences will be the actual thing that breaks society, not gay people loving each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

the social contract

1% toilet paper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

As one of the other posters mentioned (@Jordan117@lemmy.world) , it’s exactly this. Johnson will refuse to certify the results of the election that put Democrats in the House, claiming some kind of bullshit irregularities with no proof, leaving the House controlled by facists. They’ll then claim irregularities in the presidential election and force a contingent election where they have a 100% chance of electing Trump no matter what the public votes.

More people need to be made aware that this is 100% legal for them to do, and more people need to be aware that it is almost certainly what they will try. The only thing that can possibly stop it is significant awareness by the mass population of Americans and significant publicity (similar to how mass awareness of Project 2025 turned it into a poison pill).

EDIT: Oh look, they’ve already started making it super-legal in battleground states: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/06/georgia-local-election-boards-allowed-withhold-vote-certification

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This does appear to be their plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Conservatives: “It’s just a joke!”

Also Conservatives: “Jan 06 was tourists!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

While that’s true, there’s another thing just as true - the other side has a plan to seize the power with democratic measures.

It’s deep state vs bandits. Surely the latter are not cool, but the former, while being cool, are very dangerous.

It’s Palpatine vs Hutts. You wouldn’t want to be ruled by a Hutt. But Palpatine has his quirks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
166 points

He’s going to attack the capital. Again.

permalink
report
reply
103 points

Attacking capital is great, it’s attacking capitols I have a problem with

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Right you are Ken

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I understand that reference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Last time they only got in because Trump stopped the security forces from doing their job. This time it will be different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Get rekt, Jackson!

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Attacking the capital was a last-ditch hail mary move, and only viable when he controlled the military.

They’re going to use baseless conspiracies to try to fuck with the election certification enough (with an assist from the courts) to force a contingent election in the House, where they’ll likely have a majority of state delegations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Well, that’s terrifying

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The whole Republicans house is in on it again. They have a multi-prong plan to seize the White House, from voter suppression to elector rigging, gerrymandering and outright violent intimidation. The coup will be much better planned this time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, but if you know that then certainly the current administration knows that.

Last I checked Biden still controlled the NSA, CIA, and FBI.

Do y’all really thing something being “legal” is all it takes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Love to see the face of Jan 6 2.0 rioters, when they realized someone in power actually wants to stop them this time

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They don’t need a riot this time. Mike Johnson will refuse to recognize the results and then the house will vote for the next president with each state receiving one vote. Republicans control a majority of house delegations, so they will vote for Trump.

The riot was a smokescreen. It was to buy time to strong arm the state legislatures and convince Mike Pence to not certify the results. With Johnson on board, they can forget the smokescreen and just steal the election in plain sight.

They only need the house of representatives to steal a presidential election. The only thing that could stop it is some house Republicans voting with Democrats to remove Mike Johnson as speaker. (Or, I guess, finding their conscience and voting for Harris as a state delegation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You made me think of Vincent Vega, beause this is how I feel about that prospect.

Boy, I wish I could’ve caught him doing it. I’d have given anything to catch that asshole doing it. It’d been worth him doing it just so I could’ve caught him doing it.

Bring it on, traitors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Way harder to do when you aren’t the sitting president

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

He’s going to attack the capital electoral process. Again.

This is why Democrats are saying the need to win overwhelmingly

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He doesn’t need to. He’ll just the the Republican legislatures of swing states to send electors that will vote Trump regardless of November results.

And the worst part is that it’s probably legal. The Constitution gives individutal state legislatures the authority to select electors in whatever way they wish, and they can probably change their method between the November election and the meeting of the electors in December if they decide they don’t like the outcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
126 points

One aspect of the fake elector scheme was to block the counting of rightfully assigned electoral college votes.

If they can successfully do that in enough states to prevent either candidate from getting 270, then it goes to the House of Representatives to select the president.

Each state gets one vote, and since there are only 19 states with Democratic controlled legislatures, that would guarantee a Trump win, no voting necessary.

permalink
report
reply
70 points
*

They managed to shore this one up after Jan 6. Now, instead of just needing a single Representative and Senator to challenge a vote, you need 1/5 of each body.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electoral_Count_Reform_and_Presidential_Transition_Improvement_Act_of_2022

So an improvement, no doubt Election Denialers have more schemes in mind though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Even at 1/5th of each body… 88 Congressmen and 20 Senators… The Republicans have that, 220 and 50.

permalink
report
parent
reply
105 points

This article, combined with the Rolling Stone article just posted about 70+ election deniers running elections in critical states and counties, I have a strong feeling that Trump thinks he has already stolen the next election. The fix is in.

permalink
report
reply
78 points

This is it. His advisors have told him about this plan, and the orange idiot can’t keep his fucking yap shut about anything. He’s literally saying the quiet part out loud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Anything we can do to get the traitors out of these key positions?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Nothing I’d want to suggest on a public forum…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Ammo box

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not likely since they are mostly in republican run states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Since this is from MSNBC…

This is Rachel Maddows take on this as well. Essentially that states will refuse to certify the results.

They tried to do it last election, but weren’t really prepared. This time, they feel they’ve got this on lock.

permalink
report
parent
reply
94 points
*

Because the fix is in with the Republican state legislatures and Republican Governors; and The DOJ / Supreme Court is gladly eating Trump’s soiled diapers with a fork and knife

permalink
report
reply
33 points

It’s gonna be 2001 again unless Harris can really knock it out of the park

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Only this time tRump owns the supreme Court

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

This is my take too. Whole country votes solidly blue but the SC crowns Trump king anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

The 💰$upremacy Court💰

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It ain’t like the Supreme Court did the right thing then either, Roger fucking Stone was tied up in that shit too

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments