• Google is transitioning Chrome’s extension support from the Manifest V2 framework to the V3.
  • This means users won’t be able to use uBlock Origin to block ads on Google Chrome.
  • However, there’s a new iteration of the app — uBlock Origin Lite, which is Manifest V3 compliant but doesn’t boast the original version’s comprehensive ad-blocking features.
583 points

I’d just like to reassure everybody that you can quit using Google Chrome. I switched to Firefox a year ago. You can switch to something else too. Give it a try.

Wait, I don’t need to nudge anybody. After all the ads start invading their browsing experience I doubt anybody will need much prodding.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

Yep… when ublock quits working for me on Chrome then I will migrate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
300 points

Why wait? Migrate now. There’s even Firefox for mobile with ublock

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

There is?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Or better still firefox focus. Ad blocking built in and it drops all the cookies as soon as you close it.

I keep firefox on mobile for when I need to go to a trusted site, firefox focus for everything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I personally enjoy Ecosia. They’re the ones who plant trees whenever you use their search engine, and while not the best, at least their mobile app has a built in ad-blocker that imo seems pretty decent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Mostly inertia and other priorities…

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I tried but for some reason certain websites can’t play any videos on Firefox without buffering every like 5 or 10 seconds for a few seconds. It happens on 100% of videos on YouTube and like 50% of videos on any other website. It’s super annoying, so back to chrome I went and I guess I’ll stay until ublock bites the dust and I have to move.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yup

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Rocking Firefox even from my Android phone. It works great!

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

It also blocks everything else on the website.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It’s definitely more of a hassle than most people will want to deal with. But I still prefer to have it and selectively enable things as needed, because quite frankly I’d rather deal with predictable hassles of my own making than be bombarded with new bullshit every day due to ever worsening trends in enshittification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

iirc some hardened firefox configs, including arkenfox, recommend using ublock ONLY. other privacy extensions like noscript aren’t worth using because ublock replicates all of their features plus more

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why not both?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

look into umatrix, it’s a better noscript, made by the same dev as ublock.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Because it can ruin your browsing experience all together. It’d be like installing multiple anti-virus programs on your Windows PC

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You can basically use uBlock Origin as NoScript (or I think ScriptSafe? or did they change back?) if you put it into “hard mode.”

I personally like “medium mode”. I guess I get why they hide it behind several obscure steps, but I feel like they should advertise it more. It’s a nice middle ground. Still breaks every website the first time you go there but meh. Small price to pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Firefox reader mode is the champ, especially when combined with uBlock

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You can even keep all your bookmarks

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I don’t understand the inertia if I’m honest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Easy to understand. People don’t like change.

Despite 25 years in IT, and knowing better, I only recently switched back to Firefox. I expected a fair bit of hassle, and I won’t say the transition was seamless, but I was astounded.

Those of us in the know aren’t doing any good circle jerking ourselves over our superior browser. We need to get our friends, coworkers and relatives engaged. And that should be easy if we contrast our ad-free experience with theirs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

On that note: Anyone wanting the same look and feel of Chrome without ads should try Brave. No add-ons or plugins necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Nobody that cares about seeing ads is still on chrome. I bet they don’t lose more than 8-10% market share in a year even that is probably super high

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ve always used Firefox on every other device I own, but now I need to do something about my Chromebook.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you know if brave browser is better than firefox? they claim to prioritize user privacy more than firefox

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’d use Firefox over brave. The company behind brave will still sell your data.

They’re selling the tor feature of brave. You can install tor in FF.

I like brave because it’s staffed with developers full-time to block YouTube. I don’t love their crypto, but I don’t use it, and it does pay their devs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

brave is based on chromium, so it’s not 100% safe from google

permalink
report
parent
reply
224 points

I would like to take this opportunity to remind everyone that even the United States FBI recommended using ad blocking extensions to protect yourself online.

https://www.ic3.gov/Media/Y2022/PSA221221

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

I always wondered about this and how all the ad blocking apps have complete access to every webpage you visit.

Also to add to this, its made a little weirder considering ad blocking makes you more susceptible to fingerprinting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yea, that is what gets me too, when I look at the blockers to use; Ad blockers have access to all keystrokes, forms and pages. They have access to my banking and other codes when I use them .

While I am sure the more popular blockers do not abuse this, and the code most likely checked line by line. It’s still possible for a handful of mistakes to allow supply chain attacks or a dozen other things to happen.

It worries me, so I don’t use them as extension and use security elsewhere

permalink
report
parent
reply
180 points

Firefox is the bomb.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

see also: librewolf

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Mull is the closest

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I’m not saying to never use Firefox Android forks, but the reality is that Chromium forks are significantly more secure on Android, such as Mulch (same dev as Mull) and Chromite (Bromite fork).

Again, I am talking security, not privacy, and specifically for Android.

Here is a good write up on the topic from the developer of the Mull and Mulch browsers:

https://divestos.org/pages/browsers

For desktop there are a lot of good Firefox forks, such as Mullvad’s Browser, Librewolf, & Waterfox. If a website needs Chrome to work, I just use Vivaldi or Ungoogled Chromium.

Edit: I’ve made this point a few times, and always with lots of downvotes, just kind of funny. Especially when I provided a technical write-up from the developer of a security focused distro (DivestOS) as well as two popular security focused Android browsers (Mull and Mulch), but hey, maybe you all know better than he does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Fennec is a pace in the right direction for that

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It is… revolutionary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yea, I’m just waiting for the bomb to go off when Mozilla inevitably ends up following Google’s example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Thankfully, Firefox is open-source, so we can just use one of the forks, or perhaps Ladybird will be ready for general release by that time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Firefox already adopted manifest V3 but specifically kept the features needed for adblockers

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yep, I’m watching intently with the shit they’ve been doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

YouTube isn’t playing on Firefox with Ublock for me either. I’ll need to go through and reinstall my extensions, but I couldn’t find the root cause so far, I’d just been using chrome with ublock for YouTube and Firefox for everything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Make sure jnn-pa.googleapis.com isn’t blocked anywhere in your network. It may perhaps be blocked in a filter list you have activated in uBO, DNS, VPN, Firewall, anti-virus, Firefox enhanced tracking protection, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Try NewPipe or a fork of that for YouTube on Android.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It doesn’t have recommendations or ability to comment does it? And ReVanced is still working for me on Android.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

As for grey jay, I haven’t had time to compile it yet. ReVanced is working well for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But that wouldn’t have comments or updating recommendations, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Saaaaame for me on PC. Such a bummer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

FreeTube is available for Windows and Android. It has SponsorBlock built in as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
119 points

Susceptible to intrusive ads and viruses.

My Windows computer was infected more than once by virus spreading ads on legitimate websites. The site owners denied any responsibility for the viruses saying it was the fault and responsibility of the ad companies. Never again.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

The site owners are correct. And if the ad companies can’t be bothered to vet their ads, I can’t be bothered to look at them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points

KilledByGoogle up next: Chrome. You mean they pulled the plug on Chrome.

A lot of momentum to dissipate but the ad blocker defines a bearable web experience.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Nah, chrome will block “intrusive” ads to maximise Google’s revenue

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 523K

    Comments