JD Vance, no fan of gender-neutral bathrooms, was photographed in his high school yearbook next to three girls posing in front of urinals in a bathroom during his senior year.

169 points

I’m no fan of Vance, but I’m really struggling to see why this photo matters.

permalink
report
reply
191 points

He supports criminalising people of the ‘wrong’ gender using the wrong bathroom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

That really isn’t what’s happening in the photo, as I’ve said in more detail elsewhere in the thread, and pretending that’s what’s being depicted makes the attack look foolish and desperate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points
*

I see girls in a boys’ bathroom for a joke picture? Is that not what it is? That’s what he’s advocating to criminalise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

His hypocrisy between what he’s done and what he says.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

I dunno man, downvote me or whatever, but this really feels like it’s reaching? This is literally just him fucking around as a kid in high school. Who cares?

He’s a piece of shit no doubt, but hate him for the stupid shit he’s saying and doing now and recently. Not for some random photo of him from over 20 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

For what it’s worth, I have to agree with you. I guess people forget that kids do stupid shit in high school, and this photo isn’t really that stupid. Now if this was a photo of Vance organizing a right-wing group in high school, that might be noteworthy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I went from super conservative evangelical, even harder right than my parents in many ways, in high school, very nearly got pulled into even further right stuff in young adulthood, and now am basically the opposite of all of that. Had facebook been a thing when I was that age, who knows what nonsense I would have been spouting or doing.

I despise Vance and all the he and his ilk stand for, but I agree this just doesn’t feel right to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yeah this is a reach. He’s a big enough turd we really don’t need to stretch this much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m thinking, if you got to have fun, minding your own business… not hurting anyone; No matter how much you may have grown or changed and no longer like or approve of doing those activities, you don’t get to be part of a brigade that strips the rights from people who DO choose to and again, aren’t hurting anyone. You don’t get to incite violence against people who are Minding Their Own Fucking Business without the bare minimum of getting exposed for being a fucking hypocritical piece of shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

“So one day you’re posing with girls in the boys bathroom and 22 years later you’re against it. WHICH IS IT VANCE???”

I guess it’s just another Phone-it-in-Friday.

Edit: Shit I’m tired. Forgot what damn day it was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

This really isn’t that, though. These women aren’t using a men’s room, they’re posing for a photo. They certainly aren’t trans men using a men’s room, as is their damn right should they wanna.

It’s high schoolers being silly.

Vance is a deplorable man with deplorable ideologies but this doesn’t demonstrate any hypocrisy.

This kind of “gotcha” is uncritical, unserious, and looks desperate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

It shows he’s changed: he’s no longer cool, man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

He’s pushing for laws that make what you see in that pic a crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is a picture in a High School yearbook.

It’s not a picture of trans people exercising their rights to use a bathroom that fits their gender.

It’s ridiculous to make those things equivalent and say it demonstrates some hypocrisy makes the author look foolish and desperate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It’s ridiculous to make those things equivalent

Yet the laws proposed by Republicans do just that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Wow man, just waking up from a coma?

Anyway, the last decade or so, Republicans have been extremely critical of transgender people, insisting that mixing sexes in the bathroom is criminally negligent, and deserves criminal charges or “self-defense”.

J.D. Vance is a Republican politician who is currently running for Vice President. His running mate is fiercely anti-LGBT, as are most of his closest peers in Washington. He has been photographed in drag, and with women in the men’s bathroom.

This illustrates hypocrisy, and a lack of claimed values.

If you would like to learn more about right-wing bigotry and hypocrisy, I suggest removing your head from your ass and opening your eyes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I totally agree with you about right wing hypocrisy and bigotry, I just don’t think this will serve as a good example of it. Being transphobic wouldn’t preclude him, or anyone that could be swayed to vote for him, from thinking that gender bending (mocking trans people) comedy is funny… not all performances are endorsements. Things like minstrel shows and blackface were also considered funny at a point in time and it’s not because anyone involved thought blacks were people or deserving of equal rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They know all of this, but the only thing that matters is making the opposition look bad. The narrative is the only thing that matters, and reality or context are mere inconveniences. It’s a politics thing. Annoying if you want the truth, but unfortunately effective in a popularity contest like the US elections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean sure. But if anyone sees their pleas as anything other than a smoke screen, I don’t think we are in the same game. I have no way of taking them as anything other than just gaslighting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

If anything it’s just a bit… weird…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I tend to agree and give a ton of leeway to stupid, offensive stuff from years past that people have evolved from. We all said and did stupid stuff that we regret. However, this isn’t offensive, and that’s to highlight that Vance either A. regressed in his values from being normal to being weirdly pro-hyper-traditional gender roles or B. has no true beliefs and is just saying what he says because he thinks it wins him votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Thank the gods they didn’t have the internet in my younger days. Still, fuck that guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Because he’s purportedly a man of family values and that includes strict gender lines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not everything has to “matter”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Also, Lemmy is not the target audience that these revelations are meant for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

So JD Vance has proven to be one of the most hypocritical people in politics, which is a lot to say, like saying he is the one of the people with most guns in Texas or something like that.

This pic, and others like it, are basically checking ALL boxes on the stuff he seemed to be OK with before but now denounces because he is a weird hypocrite.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Now all we need is for those who support people like him to care about their leaders being exposed as hypocrites, but they’ve proven over and over that they don’t, so this kind of story has zero impact on them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

True, but if we join them in not caring, then the hypocrisy is completely normalized

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I came here to say this. I’m not a fan but who fucking cares about this shit? It just seems petty and desperate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Careful i said something similar about the ‘yep’ comment from 2020 and i got some aggressive replies on here. (Apparently im an enlightened centralist or something haha) I agree with you though theres so much worse out there on this weird fella

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m a fan of the semi-newish tactic of making the RNC look like hypocritical weirdos. It’s effective and there’s plenty of material to work with. These kind of reaches look desperate and that’s really not the position the DNC is fighting from nor needs to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m a fan of the semi-newish tactic of making the RNC look like hypocritical weirdos

“Making them look”?.. I think you misspelled “exposing them for being”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It’s like Trump and the Koi fish feeding nonsense. Or Obama and Tan Suits. Just weird shit to fixate on

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s just plain weird

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Are we a week away from a picture of him in blackface?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I just about guarantee such a picture exists somewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

and about 17-21 days from legitimate gay sex

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Party with Trudeau?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That may get him more votes

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I went to a summer camp in the 80s and 90s and we had this big event where the camp was separated into groups and each given a country. There were a ton of events, but some of the events were writing a song about the country and then another where you would act out some spirit event for the country. Always points for being dressed up with “traditional” clothing from the country.

It was a wretched hive of cultural appropriation and stereotypes. The song I remember the most is about how everyone was starving in Ethiopia. I saw some pictures of us all dressed and man oh man, if I were running for office those would be incredibly embarrassing.

Know what I know now, I realize how wrong the whole thing was and doesn’t represent me at all 30 years later. In fact I even stand against these things now.

One could easily look at these and claim im some massive hypocrite. But the reality is that I was a dumb teen having fun and now I’ve grown up.

On some level, I feel bad for people who think we should hold shit that happened as a teenager against us…like were you not out having fun being an impetous dumbass? Is these nothing you did as a teenager that you wouldn’t do now or think is wrong?

permalink
report
reply
34 points

I basically agree with you, but the subtext is a little different.

I don’t think this photo is damning in any way. It looks like some kids having fun in a pretty typical way. It’s pretty normal for kids to “joke,” and play around with gender. But this dude had some fun as a teen and now he’s trying his damnedest to ensure no one ever gets to express themselves in a way that is incongruous with their agab. It’s worth pointing out that that’s shitty for some specific reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

He’s a piece of shit because his policies are terrible. Whether or not his current actions are congruent with his actions as a teen, which is true for most all of us, are two separate things.

I don’t believe he’s genuine, but if he is, like I am with my current beliefs, stupidity as kid shouldn’t be held as some evidence against who he is now.

Don’t get me wrong, when I first saw this my reaction was “he’s the gift that keeps on giving” but after some introspection, the more I think about it, the less I like it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

See that’s just it I don’t think this picture shows that he was stupid as a kid I think it shows that he’s unwilling to grant the freedom of self-expression and self-discovery that he went through to kids today.

It’s not his participation in this picture that is damning in any way, It’s who he is now that damns him.

The kid in this picture was doing normal kid shit, I can’t even figure out why someone might be offended by it but I know a Republican WOULD immediately reach for their pearlsif they saw this picture thinking it was taken recently. They would call it wokeness, and attribute it to the deep state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That’s a good point. It’s just kinda funny because my reaction to it is basically “wow. maybe he actually used to be a real human.”

I think probably this just illustrates that he’s not genuine. That said I like your reflection that past behaviour should not be used as evidence against who a person is currently. That’s probably a good baseline, even if the past evidence could actually be viewed in a positive light.

Anyways. Thanks for the thoughtful exchange.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I agree with the teen stuff. At some point, we expect that people quit the dumb, attention seeking behavior. If they don’t learn, it becomes weird. It also is why the weird meme sticks so hard. It is MAGA signature brand.

TLDR: Kleenex became synonymous for tissues. MAGA is weird in the same way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’ve always said that you can’t just take one piece of a person’s life out of context to judge them. You have to look at the complete picture. You from 30 years ago doesn’t represent who you are today. BUT…it can inform a complete picture.

Remember the news articles about teenaged Mitt Romney holding a classmate down and forcibly cutting the kid’s hair? By itself, it just said Romney was a jerk as a kid. If Romney turned into an upstanding person over the years, it would be unfair to judge him based on what he did as a teenager. But we have the family dog incident and the numerous Bain articles to add to his teenaged antics, and we can build a complete picture of him, a picture that shows year after year, he was a jerk that liked to lord it over ‘inferiors’. We harped on that, all the way to his 47% comment, to illustrate that he thinks people who aren’t multi-millionaire hedge-fund conservatives should shut up and take the boot to the face. We convinced enough people in 2012 that despite Obama’s handling of 2009 through 2012, Obama should get a second chance rather than let “Better Than Thou” Romney get into office.

JD Vance (and his boss) fit in the same boat. We’re NOT just hammering him based on the fact that he did stupid stuff as a kid. We’re pointing the hypocrisy of getting all up in other people’s business while having some really weird shit going on in his business. And his history of telling other people what to do extends all the way to the present day.

In short, Vance hasn’t changed, so his teenage antics are fair game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t see how this picture shows that he was getting up in other people’s business while a kid. Besides, why not just focus on the BS he is doing now? That should be enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

“Kamala Harris created inflation that’s crushing American families, caused a historic crisis at our southern border, and allowed deadly fentanyl to flood into communities across our country, (complete bullshit) and this is what the media is worried about,” a spokesperson for Vance told The Daily Beast in a statement when asked about the photo.

“A goofy high school yearbook from over 20 years ago? Get a life,” the spokesperson concluded (I actually 100% agree with this.)

This is just fucking stupid. There are half a billion more important things to discuss, we don’t need this kind of stupidity in the national conversation.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

You might actually be right for all the wrong reasons, actually. This IS a critically important issue for many voters, as JD Vance is making the subject of this photo strictly illegal with criminal charges for minors or even justifying “self-defence” style assaults on minors.

However, anybody who cares about this issue likely isn’t a swing voter, we’re not going to attract moderates with this sort of publicity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

no you get a life

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

JD Vance puts his cast iron in the dishwasher pass it on

permalink
report
reply
11 points

These were his early years, where he was only experimenting with dry humping ottomans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Jorkin Depeanus Vance uses sugar substitute in his sweat tea. Pass it on

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments