291 points

Aren’t you supposed to plan appearances like this ahead of time to prevent this exact thing from happening?

permalink
report
reply
179 points
*

Plan? The only plan they got is project 2025. I don’t think it spells out how to order donuts without acting weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points
*

Imagine ordering ANYTHING as vaguely as “some of this, some of that, whatever makes sense”.

“Sir, that’s not even a real order. I don’t have time for your bullshit.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Reminds me of customers at the bank I used to work for who would want the teller to pick which account the money went into. Like bro, make an effort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

In his defense. And that’s the only time i will ever say that. The Dunkin Donuts around here will do a mixed dozen where the employee just puts 12 random flavors in the box. It’s possible he was expecting that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

The heritage foundation did serious planning.

Then they outsourced it to these guys, who didn’t do shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Imagine being born in a position of privledge, and never being told “no” in your entire life. Why would you ever make a plan when you make the subconscious assumption that everyone operates around what you want?

On a related note, this is why “Woke” is so offensive to people like JD Vance. “We were doing just fine before you people started complaining!” is an easy thought to have from the lap of luxuryn

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Why would you ever make a plan when you make the subconscious assumption that everyone operates around what you want?

Because their whole life has been geared toward allowing them to believe they are entitled to everything.

As always, calling others “entitled” was pure projection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

from my understanding (and thats making the whole situation even more baffling) he grew up in a ohioan blue-collar family, which means he probably heard “no” more then enough.

especially regarding the family couch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

They’re all magas here were I work so it didn’t work out as well, but our congressional rep planned a stop over here so I planned a day off. I wish more people would have done that, but I live in asshole land. :/

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

When I worked at a store that sold guns in 2016, supposedly there was a chance that a certain oddly-colored cheeto would be making a PR appearance after a speech in town.

I straight up told my manager if they actually think it’s a real possibility then I will not be returning to work after my lunch break. I don’t think for a second my threat actually made a difference, but I’d like to think my manager and district manager would take their ONLY trained tech for their most profitable services in 8 states and risk them leaving over a PR stunt they know will piss off half the people who shop there.

However when one of the red hats found out that the district manager called corporate to say it wasn’t a good idea, they quit. Granted, nobody cared since it was their first week, but I know they were talking about being desperate for work they were qualified for that won’t do a background check. So they quit over stupid shit when they apparently needed the money.

Logic is not strong with that crowd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Planning is only as good as the planner. Sometimes you still end up giving a press conference at the wrong Four Seasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh for sure, happens all the time, was hardly of note even

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

[insert “Four Seasons Total Landscaping” reference]

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

they’re so full of themselves they cannot conceive of someone who doesn’t want to comply with them and get a moment of fame on TV. that person denying to be on camera probably destroyed his mood for the whole day as he wondered what he did- “there’s no way she hates me so much she doesn’t want to be seen on TV next to me… I’m famous!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
170 points

This clip proved to me that couchfucker Vance is definitely not “from the middle class”

Hes obviously never ordered donuts himself. No clue what they are, expects to walk in and get handed a box of glazed donuts and a box of mixed donuts, while people are amazed and happy to have “someone like him” in the store.

permalink
report
reply
57 points
*

I mean… if all you ever did was buy donuts at a supermarket, you kind of would expect that.

I don’t buy a lot of donuts (personally not a big fan and they make for weird interactions at work) but when I do? My order is usually “Uh. Three or four boston creme, three or four jelly, and then whatever you have a lot of for the rest”. And I have definitely done the Dunkin run where it is “a box o joe and then two dozen of whatever donuts. Also <insert breakfast standwich here>.”

So I won’t fault couch fucker for having a hard time picking out donuts or basically just saying “I don’t care, just give me two dozen donuts. Feel free to pick the stale ones”. But it is more just the overall shitshow of it for not having someone run up ahead to make sure the store and staff were cool with it.

Story time! Back in… damn I guess it would have been 08? Obama and Biden were doing the “man of the people” bullshit. Incredibly blue region with strong ties to Biden so it was basically a freebie to record a few press bits. Was getting lunch and chatting with a buddy about all the cars on the street and the like when some 20-something year old girl in a suit comes in. She leans in and asks the person at the counter something and then comes around to the various tables to make small talk and ask leading but kind of inflammatory questions. She asked us what our views on abortion were (and, while I won’t repeat what my buddy said because it was definitely sexist, it was quite possibly the greatest failed pick-up line of all time). She then gets up and states something like “In five minutes, Obama and Biden will be walking through that door. We apologize for the inconvenience. As we get closer, anyone who does not want to be on camera will be directed to move over towards that wall. It will only be for ten minutes and we will pay for everyone’s meal, regardless of if you are on camera or not. Thank you”.

And, let me tell you? Buying lunch for a bunch of students goes a long way toward making for a warm reception. And while it was obvious they had been prepped on the menu, it was also obvious that this was the kind of food both future presidents ate semi-regularly. And it was obvious they had been prepped on which tables were likely avid democrats, which were republicans, and which were dumbass kids who were hitting on the point person for the casual “So, what can we do to earn your vote?” style bits.

But… that is kind of the thing. It is not a complicated bit of theatre. I am sure the approach has changed a bit (now that everyone has camera phones and tiktok) but it still holds true. Have someone run ahead to make sure you aren’t entering a hostile situation that will just make everyone look bad.


Everything blurs together and I am too lazy to google, but now I am wondering if that press event was specifically because everyone (of the republicans) were losing their god damned mind over the existence of a black man. Err, I mean Obama liking dijon mustard or something. So have him and his old white guy buddy eat some normal people food (because dijon mustard is insanely fancy, obviously).

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I’m curious about these weird workplace donut interactions you’ve had.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Like I said, I am not a big fan of donuts. A lot of people aren’t. But there is the expectation that everyone should bow down to the person who brought them to the breakroom and join the mad rush when the email goes out and so forth. Not to mention that some people DO like donuts (more power to them) and might be polite enough to ask if anyone minds if they take a second one which has led to a few slack chats of everyone feeling the need to list that they had 1 and so forth. Which invariably reveals who didn’t have any and leads to “oh, are you on a diet”? level conversations that can make others feel self conscious about their weight.

Personally? I am a big fan of bringing a box to an early morning meeting or whatever. Absolutely hate bringing them to a breakroom or, for the truly deranged, walking them around an office.

Things have gotten a lot better in the past decade or so of “I don’t eat gluten” becoming ridiculously common. But I find it still puts people into unnecessarily awkward situations where one person might think it is a nothingburger of an interaction and someone else might take it as “Are you saying I am fat and need to go on a diet?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I kinda need to hear the terrible pickup line, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The anecdote of the recon girl in the suit is one of the most interesting that I’ve read in some time. Totally makes sense that they would do that.

How do folks feel about whether that low level of deceit is appropriate?

When I think about the costs, I think maybe a couple people spent a couple minutes of their time giving opinions they might not have if they had had all the information up front. But tiny hurt feelings seems the biggest downside, I guess, which shouldn’t be too problematic.

Of course if the staffer told the whole truth, an activist could feign support to secure an interaction where they shout down the candidate on their pet issue (“a TAN suit, Barrack?!”).

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Personally, I don’t see any deciet here.

Nobody claimed anything, someone just went around asking questions. Personally I wouldn’t care if a red hat came into my Cafe and asked questions like that, and I would give my very strong opinions exactly as I would to anyone else. If they said a republican was about to come in for a PR stunt, I would ask to speak to the owner, and if they’re actually cool with that the they have lost my business.

I still wouldn’t feel like the person who came in was being in nay way subversive.

Honestly if I ran across one of their candidates alone in the middle of the night I might feel the urge to deck them whether I act on it or not, but that exact thing is the reason they should go without stating the reason for the questions and visit fist thing. What if someone were just psychotic and armed? They could quite easily pretend to be the world’s largest supporter in order to get a seat at the next table over for a better shot, instead of the scout saying “that guy in the corner gave strange vibes, better put extra security over there or pass on this one”

Or someone might start throwing shoes…

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

What an absolute weirdo. Choosing my (half-)dozen mixed donuts is one of the bigger joys of a donut run.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

He’s the guy in the suburbs with the “cowboy up” stickered lifted fuel tuned diesel on 38’s that he’s upside down on payments on because he spent this months trust fund payout on cocaine and ED pills.

We all know that guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The guy with knotted tires run half-baked because he only drives it on paved roads, the dirtiest it gets is when it rains, and the most it’s ever hauled is a kids seat in the back. He was so close to buying a boat but always complains about gAs PrIcEs

permalink
report
parent
reply
164 points

I like how she asked not to be filmed and they filmed her anyway and then released it.

It really shows how much they care about a woman’s consent.

permalink
report
reply
68 points

Could be even more sinister than that. Like if you think about it, why would they want to show that? It doesn’t show anything positive about his campaign or engagement, so releasing that footage won’t help him directly. But he is aware of how aggressive some of Trump’s supporters can be with people they hate. So I wonder if he decided to post that part of the video specifically to trigger the MAGAs that would harass (or worse) the business and/or employees.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

We need some kind of group that can protect people like her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Some kind of brotherhood pledged to enforce the law

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think they’re trying to lose so they can have a coup and not have to worry about losing ever again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t know what the situation in the states is, but wouldn’t she be allowed to sue him for this, because they disrespected their privacy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

She should. It’s a “public” place, but it’s not like she chose to be there at that moment because she knew Vance was going to be there. She has no other choice than to be there, per the terms of her contract.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points
*

It really shows how much they care about a woman’s consent.

I don’t need consent from my TV in order to watch it.

Edit: Ran afoul of Poe’s Law. “Surely no one would actually believe I was serious right?”
Internet: Gestures broadly

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

Are you comparing a living breathing woman who’s doing her job to your TV? Like, you do know you need consent to film in a private establishment, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I dropped the /s
The point being they consider women to be objects so why would they care about her consent?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To be fair, I don’t think Vance got consent from the couch either

permalink
report
parent
reply
144 points
*

This is why people say magapublicans are weird, they’re so out of touch!

Has Vance never been in a bakery before!? Quick tip: when they ask you what you want, don’t reply “I mean a lot of glazed here. Some sprinkle stuff. Some of these cinnamon rolls. Just whatever makes sense.”

What??

Try ordering from the menu. Or ask them what’s good. Or request an assortment of the most popular kinds…

permalink
report
reply
78 points

It’s one donut JD, how much could it cost, $10?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Or lean into your stupid richness. Buy five of everything and just start handing them out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Oh, no. The one thing rich people never want to do is give people handouts!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They’d claim they handed them out, but in reality only their team got one each, and the rest were thrown away (and sprinkled with poison to make sure they don’t get pulled out of the dumpster)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Rich people want their own handouts cause they deserve it unless those filthy plebs. Those plebs are only taking advantage of the system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

If I were trying to be fair, I’d argue that that basically was an attempt to order an assorted dozen, albeit an awkward one.

But fascists don’t deserve fairness, so I won’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I bet Walz stops at a donut shop tomorrow. I think he knows his way around one quite well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Just whatever makes sense

“…For a photo op, im not eating this pleb shit”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This sounds awfully close to “Dijon mustard on a burger! How out of touch can you be!” Levels of ridiculousness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“I mean a lot of glazed here. Some sprinkle stuff. Some of these cinnamon rolls. Just whatever makes sense.”

You gotta see it from their perspective, they’re CEOs (presumably) and aren’t used to knowing the details. They just vaguely point in vague directions (“pitch”) and let the employees figure out the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

“I’m JD Vance I’m running for vice president,” Vance said. “Good to see you.”

The employee sounds unmoved and replies with “okay” and waits for him to begin his order.

Does he expect people to get down on their knees after he tells them that?

permalink
report
reply
90 points

“okay…”

silence

“I’m sorry but we don’t have any couch shaped donuts”

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

“Oh we’re prepared for this! One moment please!”

Call to the back: “Guys, we need the plastic cover for the couch, it’s a code V!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

“I’m sorry, our couch donuts aren’t glazed.”

JD Vance, tugging on his suddenly sweaty shirt collar: “Oh I think I can help out there.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“I’m sorry, our couch donuts aren’t glazed.”

That’s ok. He prefers to do that part himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Or “okay…”

“Then it’s cash only…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The “Please Clap” energy was intense nostalgic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“What are your intentions with my donuts?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I literally laughed

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

The “OK” crushed him. He was expecting any reaction and she could give 2 shits about him. Order your donuts and get the fuck out, ain’t nobody got time for your ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Imagine if she had a zinger loaded. “Yeah, you’re the running mate for ‘America’s Hitler.’”

Actually they probably got a bunch of reactions like that and “ok” was the one person that put him in the best light.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Simplicity is better in most cases. When someone has to tell you who they are and you respond “ok”. That is brutal. You are literally saying I don’t give a fuck

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Kind of wish she had said, “That’s weird.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

My fantasy:,

“Not under Trump, right?”

“Actually…”

“Ewwww”

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments