US presidential candidate Donald Trump said he would appoint Elon Musk to head a government efficiency commission if he is elected to office in November.

“At the suggestion of Elon Musk, who has given me his complete and total endorsement… I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms,” Trump told the Economic Club of New York.

138 points

The guy who lost $35B in a year and destroyed the business model - that guy?

permalink
report
reply
44 points

I mean, depending on what your goals are, that could very well be described as efficient.

Like, if your goal is to destroy the American government, could anyone do it more efficiently than Elmo?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

the guy that lead the Cyber Truck project? that guy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Fits nicely with Trump’s reputation

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

Translation: “I got an endorsement and a lot of money from Elon Musk, so I’m giving him a government job as a kickback where he can “regulate” his own businesses to enrich himself even further at the expense of literally every other American.”

Oh man, I can’t see a conflict of interest at all. Nope, no siree.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

He is maintaining his record of putting the worst possible person he can find in positions of power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Betsy Devos but worse

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Elon needs to get back to his CEO duties of abusing ketamine and shitposting on twitter all day long.

permalink
report
reply
72 points

Musk is CEO of 3 companies and has the time for a Government job?

Being CEO is a part time job.

permalink
report
reply
47 points
*

Isn’t it at least 5?

SpaceX

Tesla

Twitter

Neuralink

Boring Company

Now tell me that being a CEO is such a hard and stressful job that one man could be in charge of five companies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

You know what would happen if I did my job for five different companies?

I’d get fired.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

People like that consider being on the phone working. Flying on a plane, working.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Golfing? Working.

Shitposting on Twitter? Working.

Doing rails of ketamine? Working

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Someone did a study on this and found that ceos typically count their working hours as anything that is related to work including commuting. Picking up dry cleaning, even lunches since you have them with clients or are allowed to eat at your desk.

If we counted our hours the same way, then we would count things like preparing lunch and doing laundry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

I had to scroll up to see if it was The Onion.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

I’ve been saying for a few years now that I don’t blame anyone anymore for biting the onion. It is FAR TOO HARD to figure out what is life being absurd, and what is an absurd satire headline.

The lines aren’t blurred anymore. There are no lines. The lines have ceased to exist at this point.

I don’t understand life anymore, and I’d like to go back to politics being boring instead of being a circus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And that’s assuming the headline you’re reading even has any bearing on the actual article, or that the article itself is factual, both of which are increasingly more common worries now.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 426K

    Comments