12 points

Hopefully the EU takes over. It has a lot more economic strength then NATO. Also the UK is strong as well, but that can be managed. Turkey does its own things anyway and I would not trust them. Norway and Iceland are not that important. Canada is going to go with the US anyway. The advantage is easier common funding for projects, due to the EU having more direct access to money. There are also a lot of the basics in the works already.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Norway and Iceland are crucial to European defense - what are you talking about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, what is your reasoning behind that statement about Norway and Iceland?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

Nato without USA is still bigger military than Russia.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

But with a fraction of the nukes, which is the actual big stick part of NATO

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It took two nukes for Japan to wave the white flag. Do we really need 5,000+ nukes for anything? France has 290 and UK has 225. Thats enough to wipe one or multiple countries clean off of the map without any form of surrender.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yes, antimissile systems will shoot down most of your missile volley, so you need to launch enough that they become overwhelmed and the few that make it through accomplish your goal.

We don’t know exactly how much “most” is, but its enough that the powers that be consider our current level of armament to be necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

In the game of nukes you don’t really need many.

You can destroy the world just so many times.

The rest is just for showing who has it bigger (the arsenal)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A lot of that is because rest of NATO is under US umbrella. Not like nukes are high tech at this point. Most of Europe could get nukes real fast if they wanted, but everyone has been better served by it being to many Nuclear Powers up to this point

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And I expect they will get nukes real fast. Ukraine is probably going to go for that, tbh. It’s kinda their only option at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But are we bringing nukes to a biological warfare… umm… party? Or hell, AI drones/nanobots?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yep, and thankfully the EU has seen the way the US is going and started to react appropriately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
107 points
*

Good job to all of the fucks who stayed home because of Gaza, thinking that not voting and letting the GOP rise to power would actually help the situation.

Yeah, because Netanyahu’s extreme right-wing policy was a problem with the US’s left-wing party, right?

permalink
report
reply
43 points

I doubt Gaza was the deciding factor for 20 million people, but I could be wrong. Especially since anyone that aware of the whole would see trump would worsen the situation not improve it. I’m curious why they did stay home.

I also guess Americans don’t want a woman president and they do want a hard crackdown on migrants. Especially Latinos, who apparently overwhelmingly came out for trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If it mattered: Fuck the Dems for doing a genocide that cost us the Republic.

If it didn’t matter: Fuck the Dems for doing a genocide that didn’t even matter in costing us the Republic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I also guess Americans don’t want a woman president and they do want a hard crackdown on migrants. Especially Latinos, who apparently overwhelmingly came out for trump.

Latinos voting for hard crackdowns on immigrants is the biggest “fuck you, I’ve got mine” energy I’ve ever seen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

And they will be so fucking shocked when ice comes for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

By far, the overwhelming Biden derangement syndrome factor was “transgenders exist and are in my news feed”. That healthcare is available to prisoners and immigrants, means that they are all receiving gender reassignment surgeries. This is democrats fault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The fact people can’t differentiate edge cases from the norm is a general education issue. But their pushback was anemic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It wasn’t deciding factor at all. People get far too internet poisoned and fail to realize how the median voter is actually motivated in this country. Foreign policy is nearly irrelevant to most voters.

If there is any validity to the idea that Harris’ position on gaza tanked the campaign it’s in the motivated active base lost interest in giving their time, sweat, and energy to putting boots on the ground for someone that has made every promise to continue bombing children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Millions of people stayed home. I really doubt Gaza was the reason for all of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

My argument is what did the democrats have to lose for supporting Gaza/Palestinians? It’s obvious not running a fully left facing candidate and campaign was a mistake.

We are mad at the wrong people. The reality of the situation is that the democrats can’t win without the far left of the party. So why won’t we extend an olive branch? If we get a next time, what are we going to do differently?! This is the reality. Either we wake up to that or keep losing. Pick one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think it’s mutually exclusive. Why can’t we be mad the the DNC for shit strategy and be mad at the folks who stayed home?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Fuck the people who didnt vote based on gaza. They are even dumber than Maga hats. They help the candidate that is even worse for gaza win . No one should offer these people any branches. Fuck them. Treat them like the idiots they are just like we do with MAGA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Okay but if we are guaranteed to lose without them, what’s the harm in giving them what they want? Losing while taking the morally right position is never wrong. We spit in the Arab/Muslim/Palestinians/far left Americans faces and they stayed home on election day. So what’s the harm in at least giving into their demands? The Republicans do that for their base and are winning even when they lose elections. So I’m arguing a change in tactics because we are literally taking the insanity route if we don’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Good job the democrats alienating their base by trending right. I get you but this was completely avoidable if the democrats were competent and not a big circlejerk for themselves. Bernie could have beat that spastic in 2016.

Gaza is a serious issue, the US is supporting a genocide. If you cant come out against that then why bother, there isnt much more important to a lot of people. I know Trump will be worse for the region, they do too but if you cant take a principled position that aligns with people you cant complain they didnt vote for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

You can be rightfully mad at the party that’s failing to represent you correctly (I certainly am) and still make the pragmatic choice of not getting the guy who will make those issues worse elected.

We need to come together nationally and locally to attempt to affect change within the DNC more often than every 4 years, because it seems like every time we’re all reminded how incompetent they are, it’s too late for us to do anything about it for that election cycle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Didnt everyone do that four years ago, in monumental numbers and there stood a president that provided the arms to blow children out of house and home and off the face of the planet.

Biden did a lot but he missed on some vital issues and that is the fault of the dems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Good job the democrats alienating their base by trending right

Ok, but

Bernie could have beat that spastic in 2016.

Bernie lost in the primaries, it’s our own fault (I voted for him…)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Bernie lost in the primaries

DNC primaries are a joke. look at this last primary. oh wait we didn’t actually have a primary.

they intentionally waited until the “primary” was over so that Biden could get the incumbent automatic primary votes and then let him drop out so they could rush in Kamala without having a real primary.

i firmly believe if Democrats were not trying to game democracy this presidential cycle, DNC would have had a chance to beat Trump

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The mythical left dem base doesn’t out vote average centerist group. If you are looking for a perfect group you’ll never find it

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In support of that viewpoint, if they were ready to vote but just wanted to vote for someone who touted their interests, they’d have been there for a third party candidate, but they just were no where to be found.

Would be interested to see why people sat it out. To the extent it was something utterly mundane like “couldn’t afford to take any time off work to get it done”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Tbh, there’s a very dark part of me that makes me just want sit back, watch Gaza and the West Bank get fully reduced to rubble, and all the Palestinians getting put into woodchippers, and just smirk while saying “wow, good thing we dodged a Harris administration. Who knows what that would have meant for Palestine.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We know libs have been saying that for nearly a year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Oh look, “scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds” right here!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, that’ll teach the do-nothing-dems!!1

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

So you want me to reward holocaust Harris and genocide joe for not doing ANYTHING to stop it? No, I chose to teach them a lesson. Don’t blame us. Blame the dems for not doing enough and putting a shit candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

No, I chose to teach them a lesson.

The only lesson you taught them is that the general public wants more right-wing ideas. What you’ve done is teach trans, blacks, and other minorities a lesson, the lesson that they should be beaten and driven out of their country. You’ve taught that women should be submissive, treated like property, like they are in Saudi Arabia.

Good job. I hope you reflect on your “lesson” in the next four years, as your right to vote is systematical dismantled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What lesson exactly? That if the ideal candidate isn’t run, a subset of liberals will pick the worse of two options?

All that does is teach the conservatives that if they can convince you that the democrat candidate fails you enough on a single issue, they effectively have your vote. Regardless of the conservative candidate’s stance on that issue.

You have made the choice to make the problem you care about profoundly worse because there wasn’t a way to make it completely better. Have fun watching that play out as you intended I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

To teach that supporting genocide is a red line and not doing anything about it will not get you elected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d rather lose my hearing than vision if those are the only two options, despite not actually wanting to lose neither - which is not an option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Lose both, then you can shamelessly shift blame rather than risk having to bear any kind of responsibility that comes with using the remaining option.

These people are as detached from reality as the MAGA crowd if they think they’re taking any kind of moral high road by staying home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Gloating as the Palestinians receive news that help isn’t coming is something that someone who cares more about their own image than a genocide would do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

And where am I gloating exactly? I’m simply stating that you shouldn’t blame the voters but blame the dems for standing for genocide. Not like if harris was elected it would have been any better for the Palestinians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

NATO will kick us to the curb and rise to the challenge. We will need them one day and they will say no.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

I think that’s unlikely.

But I also thought Trump winning was unlikely,

So what do I know?

permalink
report
reply

NonCredibleDefense

!noncredibledefense@lemmy.world

Create post

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

Community stats

  • 892

    Monthly active users

  • 440

    Posts

  • 3.5K

    Comments