Summary

Trump won Dearborn and made significant gains in Hamtramck due to anger among Arab American and Muslim communities over deaths in Gaza, Lebanon, and Yemen.

Trump received 42.48% of the vote in Dearborn and 42.7% in Hamtramck, compared to 36.26% and 46.2% for Vice President Kamala Harris, respectively.

Despite Trump’s victory in Dearborn, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senator lost to the Democratic nominee.

99 points

They just signed Gaza’s death warrant.

permalink
report
reply
42 points
*

No. The election results are a blowout, larger than just this subcommunity.

I’m annoyed at Muslims for failing to back Harris and prevent the future atrocities. But I will not blame them. Trump got too many votes in general, and might even win the popular vote.

EDIT: We need a bigger reckoning than just blaming a minority of the minority. I don’t want to blame Harris either, she seemed to do the best that she was given but it always was long odds given that she’s a Half-Indian Half-Black Woman. (Racism from Whites, Racism from Indians for being a race-traitor, and then sexism from everyone including minorities).

But this is a bigger election loss than “just” a minority failing to show up to vote. We lost the Senate, Presidency, and probably the House.


EDIT: Kamala needed to win PA, WI, and MI. She literally lost all three of them. A large outspoken minority of just one State (MI) is not to blame for the PA or WI losses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

They all get to share the blame. What are you even trying to say? “Damn guys, I voted for hitler but it’s okay he won by more than a single vote so I didn’t even matter”

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

I’m saying we needed like 10-million more votes to even reach parity with Biden 2020 here.

Complaining about a few hundred-thousand votes in one, albeit important, swing state, is missing the forests for the trees. This is a resounding defeat of the Democrat’s platform this year.

The platform goes above and beyond just Harris btw. I’m including “Fascism” and other such arguments we used online / memes that clearly didn’t work well enough. We need to talk about everything and prepare for 2026 and 2028.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I don’t want to blame Harris either, she seemed to do the best that she was given but it always was long odds given that she’s a Half-Indian Half-Black Woman. (Racism from Whites, Racism from Indians for being a race-traitor, and then sexism from everyone including minorities).

This is bullshit rhetoric. She ran a shit campaign of trying to appease republican voters and cater to the snowflake right wing fear machine by shushing Palestine voices to back genocide directly and trying to sound tougher on immigration and border policy in the face of literal fascist policy campaigns by Trump. This is 100% the fault and failure of the Harris campaign’s strategy and the DNC for being so chicken shit scared of losing that they kept the corpse in chief in the running for too long. Catering to the fascist right policies never works and ignoring insanely popular progressive policy always fails. The beatings will continue until morale improves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I will say a large swath of the country moved to the right (anti-immigration, anti-trans, etc) and so trying to push progressive values in a time where people believe progressive values are what led to inflation is a losing argument as well that wouldn’t have gotten much national support.

There were literal commercials framing Kamala as a villain for having empathy about trans people in prison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can blame lemmy.ml for their strategic manipulation

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You can blame us for this application, sure. Having an impact on the results of this election? Unlikely

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I agree with you in general but you should be blaming Harris. Have you even been keeping up with her campaign? I couldn’t believe that shit and I’m not even American. She managed to squander a massive headstart by… Being Harris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What does that even mean?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

You’re annoyed they didn’t back the person providing the weapons to kill their families?

This election loss had nothing to do with her gender or ethnicity. She was a shit candidate that alienated huge chunks of the population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

They took the pistol out of the person’s hand that was pointed at them and replaced it with a bazooka. Good job. Very well thought out /s.

How do you not get this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

“I would do nothing different than Joe Biden”

– Kamala Harris

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

That death warrant was signed October 7 2023

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

Well now you’ve handed Gaza to the butcher and good luck if you want to protest without getting arrested.

permalink
report
reply
18 points
*

If every single Jill Stein voter had voted for Harris instead, Trump still would have won.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They’re complete fucking idiots throwing away their vote . . . but at least they went to the trouble of voting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Voting is always better than not voting, yes.

And in a functional democratic system, voting for a candidate who’s against genocide would be better than voting for a candidate who’s currently part of the government supplying the genociders.

Sadly, the US aren’t such a system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

To be fair protesters were already being injured and arrested. I know we’re all still hurting at the election loss but let’s not kid ourselves with the current administration either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You might want to start drinking heavily for what comes next.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Imagine being so fucking stupid you vote Trump to handle Gaza

permalink
report
reply
10 points

You see, they are conservative and don’t really want progressive policies, and the Palestinian genocide gave them cover to vote for a strong patriarch that felt comfortable to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I don’t know why people are downvoting you, they literally banned the lgbtq flag there once they gained power.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/17/hamtramck-michigan-muslim-council-lgbtq-pride-flags-banned

This shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

In their defense, he’ll “handle” Gaza. It turns out his “handling” is just the annihilation of any Arab within 1,000 miles of Gaza. But at least they can rest easy knowing that they “sent a message”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

If true, fucking morons. You just handed the keys to the guy who is single handedly going to let the Middle East burn.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

If all of these people voted Harris, Trump still won.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

You mean the ME that’s currently burning?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Yes, why I used the word “let”. It converts it is currently in progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Wait til he suggest (again) to just nuke it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Biden/Harris has finished the job, there is no more Gaza to nuke

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Time to learn that yeah, it can get worse

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

The lack of support for Harris among Arab-Americans may not have been rational, but it was completely predictable—and it was something the Harris campaign could have addressed by at least suggesting she might reconsider Biden’s policies.

Blame isn’t zero-sum—we’re all responsible for the predictable results of our actions (or inactions), even if those results were overdetermined.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

It’s still really, really fucking stupid to vote trump. These people fucked up in the stupidest way possible with their one vote.

Preventably. Reasonably. Knowingly.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments