Summary

Donald Trump’s decisive victory in the 2024 election leaves no room for ambiguity or an “asterisk” in his legitimacy, as he won both the popular vote and the Electoral College.

This outcome represents a clear mandate from American voters, who knowingly chose Trump’s policies and approach.

The anticipated results include pardons for January 6 participants, attacks on the press, and an administration filled with controversial figures.

By voting for Trump, Americans prioritized divisive rhetoric over democratic values, accepting the resulting turmoil.

61 points

On one hand, it’s going to be funny watching them cry about it once the consequences of their actions start to impact their lives negatively.

On the other hand, I live in Canada, so it’s going to fuck us over too.

permalink
report
reply
78 points
*

Remember, with doublespeak they’ll continue* to blame the democrats while their Republican leaders dismantle their rights, the economy, and the government right in front of their eyes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It will be a repeat of 2020. They’ll leave the country in shambles and then people will vote Democrat to fix everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That started well before 2020.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

This is extremely optimistic. Voting, as we understand it, is not going to exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Trump has openly stated that he plans to abolish voting

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You’re assuming that there will be a free and fair election in 2028.

I don’t think that’s a given anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Do not underestimate the allure of a man who offers you a boogeyman to blame all your problems on, while promising you that only he can stop it. That allure is very difficult for many people to overcome. One of the other problems with it is that even if they do see the consequences of their choices, it’s just as easy for Trump to convince them that those problems are the boogeyman’s fault too. It doesn’t have to make sense, and Trump doesn’t care if it does as long as it keeps the rubes in line and focusing their anger on anyone else but him.

This is a cult following. Any attempt to show them that their problems were caused by Trump will only cause them to MAGA harder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Eventually the house of cards fails when things get bad enough. The ride is going to suck though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

“They’re not hurting the people they need to be hurting”

We are so going to be hearing this again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

As a fellow Canafian, I think we will have our own issues soon/currently, so I’m not going to have time for schadenfreude. Granted I live in Ontario and a folksy goon has been in power with no plans for so long that maybe I’ve lost my sense of humor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Hopefully this election interference situation blows up in PPs face and the cons collapse.

I feel dirty hoping for such an outcome but it feels hopeless when someone like PP, who is obviously making a cynical power grab, has so much popularity. Canada is infested with fascists just like the US and I’m getting pretty worried about the future of humanity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Unless Petey gets caught being boring or balls deep in a hog, I doubt it’ll move the needle. I hate to say that, there’s a lot I’d hope would move the needle at all, but in my own family it’s mask off, fuck “minorites”, give me more, so… yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

it’s going to be funny watching them cry about it once the consequences of their actions start to impact their lives negatively.

Never going to happen. Or at least they will never admit it’s a consequence of the way they voted. Either Democrats are Rino’s will be blamed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They won’t admit it, but they will still cry. I will know what caused it, and that’s sufficient for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The issue is, there’s not many places in the world that won’t be affected :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
103 points

They also solidified this form of political campaigning. Its only going to get more hateful from here on out. We are watching Nero burn Rome.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

That horse sailed 8 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

We are watching Nero burn Rome.

Watching? Hell, a third of us fucking gave Nero a match while spraying the city with gasoline, and another third said “You know, I do like s’mores…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

we’ve built the world we think we deserve.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

They do NOT think they deserve what they’re about to get

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points
*

Something to keep in mind.

Trump didn’t win a significant number of new voters. He kept his base, which is roughly the size of what it was in 2020.

The problem was that Harris lost voters. In droves. Nationwide. And she took a lot of winnable downballot candidates with her. And I’m not even saying that to blame her. She ran a magnificent campaign while Trump was most noted for saying “They’re eating the dogs!”. So why did she still lose, and lose so hard? Because Democrats stayed home. Roughly about 10% of them overall, nationwide. Sure, some of them stayed home or voted 3rd party to protest Gaza, especially in Michigan. But the real story is that she underperformed so badly nationwide. I mean, for the love of God, New Jersey was competitive. That call about Iowa possibly going blue is going to be up there with “Dewey defeats Truman” in terms of political misfires. She severely underperformed with men and Latinos, especially Latino men. Which means this: 8-10 million people couldn’t stomach voting for Trump, but they’d rather passively hand over the country to Trump vs. voting for a black woman. Whether the problem they have is the fact that she’s black, female, or both is irrelevant. But the message they sent was clear. “We don’t want Trump, but we’d rather step back and just let Trump take the country rather than vote for her.”

The problems with bigotry in this country go much deeper than some people are willing to admit, and Harris just found that out the hard way. As far as the voting base is concerned, voting for Obama was a mistake that they will not repeat again, and they just proved that by handing Trump everything he wanted on a silver platter instead.

We can’t even say that it’s an outsized minority any more. A majority of the people in this country just spoke up and said that they either want the racism and bigotry or are at least willing to put up with it.

Trump won the election not because Democrat voters said “Trump!”, but because they said “Not Harris.”

permalink
report
reply
9 points

She ran a magnificent campaign

The entire point of a campaign is to attract voters…

Because Democrats stayed home. Roughly about 10% of them overall, nationwide.

So I don’t see how both statement can be true…

Her campaign did a shit job at getting people to vote for her, how do you consider it magnificent?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeah but if you start to poke fingers at the Democratic Party, you might start to realize that most of their corporate donors are fine with a Trump presidency. Almost like they were fine with Harris campaigning on keeping the status quo, because they’d win either way. Better to start blaming voters now!

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
  • She absolutely crushed Trump at the debate
  • Her rallies were drawing far more people than Trump’s
  • She had A-list star power (Beyonce, Julia Roberts, Taylor Swift, etc.) actively endorsing her
  • She took over a race where Biden was down by 5%+ and losing ground daily to at least making it competitive
  • She only had 107 days to work with.

It proved to not be enough. The people who were coming to her rallies were apparently all people who were going to vote for her anyway; the size of the rallies only gave the illusion that her campaign was attracting more voters. And with so many Democrats actively choosing to stay home rather than vote at all, it seems like nothing she did would have mattered anyway. But given the crap she had to work with, she ran a near-flawless campaign. She had no way of knowing that it just didn’t matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You listed things they tried, but didn’t work

The entire point of a campaign is to attract voters…

Literally the only metric that matters for how good a campaign was, is how many votes they got.

And Kamala drastically underperformed.

So her campaign wasn’t “magnificent” it was a spectacular disaster that couldn’t beat trump with everything you listed and a billion dollars

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Considering where Biden’s polling was this summer, the fact that the Dems held onto New York is impressive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

This is the danger of lowering our bar to Trump’s level as “good enough”

Biden could be better than trump.

Kamala could be better than Biden.

But if Kamala isn’t good enough, trump would win.

Because as multiple people have been shouting for 8 years:

Being better than trump isn’t good enough to get enough votes to beat trump

All of this could be avoided by running decent candidates who won a fair primary. But the DNC won’t give that as an option because they want to use the threat of trump to push thru as “moderate” of a Dem as they can to maximize corporate donations.

Beating trump wasn’t the DNC’s goal, it was raising as much money as possible

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Trump won because the DNC underestimated the sexists, racists and the idiot woke who think they somehow did something with this for palestine.

Editorial note:

i know woke is a poisoned word but I like to use to describe idiots who think they are so smart and better than others that they would rather let trump elected than admit that voting for the lesser evil is the right thing to do

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

Trump won because Harris ran a dog shit campaign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And Trump didn’t? It’s always very telling when you all love shouting BOTH SIDES from the mountain tops, but when it comes to blame-

Well that’s different.

Trump had nothing to campaign on. He insulted and threw temper tantrums. Yet…. Harris Rand a dog shit campaign…

Got it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

I called it back in July when I said Democrats should have run Fetterman. Only appearance matters to the majority of Americans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nailed it. People are still mad that Obama made it into the White House and we’re forever going to pay for it. And a black woman running for president? Americans all saw Trump’s serious cognitive decline — I don’t doubt that any outside of a hardcore few didn’t — but America made for damn sure it wouldn’t be Kamala.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Trump won because Harris was a shitty candidate who never won a primary for the president.

I was hoping she’d pull off a victory anyways but the lesson we should take away is that if a sitting president needs to step down from running for another term we need to have a snap election.

This all went to hell when Harris was appointed as our candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

This honestly cements my view that America is a racist nation, no question.

You don’t get 15 million missing votes without a solid chunk of those being Democrats, bog standard Democrats, that didn’t want to vote for a black woman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

that didn’t want to vote for a black woman.

If you ignore the multitude of policy issues she was to the right of the Dem voter base on, I guess you could blame it on that…

But that would just mean we’d repeat the mistake again…

Can we just stop running candidates who are to the right of the voter base?

We tried your strategy the last three elections and Trump has won 2 of them. It doesn’t seem to be working

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

We absolutely can stop running candidates. As a matter of fact, I don’t think we’ll be running candidates ever again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Oh please. You all, and let’s face it at 15 million, it’s not progressives that didn’t vote here, but honestly if you didn’t vote because of some pithy bullshit about having not progressive policies vs policies farther than the far right and into fascist policies, well you’re definitely part of that problem and thanks for condoning racism you racist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

If Kamala lost because racial bigotry — then how did Obama win? It probably has more to do with misogyny and single issue voters than it does race.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The large turnout in 2020 was more driven by the will to remove Trump than to elect Biden. This time it seems they forgot how bad it was and decided to stay home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

More immigration! Turbo immigration! You think it’s bad now? Wait until the equator starts suffering wet bulb events

permalink
report
reply
9 points

There won’t be more immigration. Quite the opposite. Get ready to see your friends, neighbors, and relatives deported. Get ready to see crops dying in the fields.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You silly person, the climate crisis coming doesn’t care, and neither will the climate refugees. We are going to see unprecedented suffering in the next two decades

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re right, climate doesn’t care. But neither do the fascists. They want the wall, and they want it armed along the entirety with the 3 trillion rounds of ammunition the army has in stockpile.

Appx 180million people from Panama to Mexico. That’s leaves just under 300k bullets per person.

Do you really think America ISNT that cruel, that evil? After yesterday? That’s the plan. I’d bet entire maternity wards on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I didn’t say we wouldn’t see suffering. I said that they will arrive and the Trump administration will deport them or something worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Yes there will, because you missed what he was saying about “wet-bulb” events.

If you wrap a wet cloth around a thermometer, and place it in air that has less than 100% relative humidity, the thermometer will read a lower temperature than an equivalent one without a wet cloth. This is because the evaporation of water wicks heat away from the thermometer; the lower the RH the faster the water will evaporate the heat from the thermometer and thus the lower the temperature will read. This is called the “wet-bulb temperature” and is how the human body cools itself when you sweat.

However, when the RH is 100% the wet-bulb and dry-bulb temperatures are the same, and the human body stops being able to cool itself by evaporation (since your sweat won’t evaporate because the air can’t hold any more moisture). In fact, thanks to physics not giving a fuck about how conservatives feel, there’s a point - thought to be above a wet-bulb temperature of 35 degrees C - where your body works in reverse and starts absorbing exterior heat.

This is fatal to the human.

The point is, the higher the RH, the less effective sweating is to cool humans down. Now what do you think will happen when people in equatorial regions- areas that have high humidity and temperatures to start with- see those temps go even higher thanks to climate change? They won’t have any choice but to move to higher latitudes, because just being outside for long periods of time will be lethal as their bodies slowly cook themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments