40 points

"If detonated, they would not damage the reactors but would create an image of shelling from the Ukrainian side,” the statement on Telegram said. It said the Ukrainian army stood “ready to act under any circumstances”.

In his nightly video message, Zelenskiy said Russia was planning to “simulate an attack” on the plant. “But in any case, the world sees – and cannot fail to see – that the only source of danger to the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is Russia. And no one else.”

Zelenskiy and the Ukrainian military provided no evidence for their assertions"

permalink
report
reply
-16 points

Zelenskiy and the Ukrainian military provided no evidence for their assertions

I’m starting to see a pattern here…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

"If detonated, they would not damage the reactors but would create an image of shelling from the Ukrainian side,” the statement on Telegram said.

Not gonna lie, that’s pretty smart. Now if Ukraine decides to start shelling the plant, they can just pretend that it’s actually Russia that detonated some charges.

I think that’s a pattern we’ll start seeing more and more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points
*

EDIT: i removed this comment previously because lemmy hiccuped and registered the one about bridge selling twice.

And despite it being empty, it still recieved 23 downvotes.

This is how factual discussion with liberals is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So, you said something dumb, and it’s everyone else’s fault? 🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

Zelenskiy and the Ukrainian military provided no evidence for their assertions

Judging from the comments, he could probably finance that entire war just by selling bridges to liberals -_-

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

How is the Russian propaganda attempting to frame that? “Ukrainians are Nazis and so we took over their nuclear power plant because we (though we) could. Now they want to destroy it, incurring an immense ecological impact to mostly themselves, because if they can’t have it, better be dead too”?

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Your guess is as good as mine. But if you have watched Russ TV, they aren’t afraid of saying the most ridiculous things.

Though according to the article: Renat Karchaa, an adviser to the head of Rosenergoatom, which operates Russia’s nuclear network, said Ukraine planned to drop ammunition laced with nuclear waste transported from another of the country’s five nuclear stations on the plant.

“Under cover of darkness overnight on 5 July the Ukrainian military will try to attack the Zaporizhzhia station using long-range precision equipment and kamikaze attack drones,” Russian news agencies quoted Karchaa as telling Russian television. He offered no evidence in support of the allegation."

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Don’t underestimate Russias stupidity and sheer incompetence, they probably think the brainwashed masses in russia will believe them. We need a hard line to stop it, but, if russia wants their face kicked in by NATO for real, who am I to deny them. I hope for a crater where the Kremlin stands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think most of them believe the government media, they just go along with it. And the ones that are against it are already dead/in gulags/sent to Ukraine. That’s what totalitarian states do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

“turns out the ukranians actually liked chernobyl, so much so that they’re probably planning on doing it again!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

How is the Russian propaganda attempting to frame that?

Just see this comment section. “Ukranian artillery did it!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

How is the Russian propaganda attempting to frame a completely baseless claim without any evidence and that make no sense, is that seriously the question you’re asking here?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
-7 points

Ah yeah, that totally looks like a reliable site that somebody without any brain damage would use as a source.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Hopefully this just ends up being another nothingburger like last time there was talk about a Ukrainian dirty bomb several months ago.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

You mean like when Ukraine claimed Russia put explosives on that dam that now is gone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No I mean when there was talk about a dirty bomb several months ago. The dam wasn’t a nothingburger, hence why I didn’t reference it??

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

The reference is not all warnings are nothingburgers

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You mean the same dam that even western media acknowledged that Ukraine was shelling?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Well, well, well. It looks like it was indeed a nothingburger. That’s a relief.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

NAFO trolls are very disappointed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-42 points

Why would Russia blow up the NPP when they’re winning the war? This is another atrocity by the Ukrainian military to muddy the waters and try to attract yet more international support like the dam bombing.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Why would Russia blow up the NPP when they’re winning the war?

Right, but they are not, they are barely holding losing ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

And causing a nuclear disaster would help with this how? PS: When you hold part of your opponents country that means you’re winning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

causing a nuclear disaster would help with this how?

The plant is located near the front lines, along a probable route to the Sea of Azov. Blowing it up creates an obstacle, making advances and supplies more difficult.

When you hold part of your opponents country that means you’re winning.

That’s a stretch. Like Germany was winning WW2 until it was kicked out of France.

True, it’s probably the best Russia can achieve but far from their goals. And they’ve been losing ground steadily now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They have a child-like mentality. If they can’t have it, then blow it up. Now no one gets it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Imagine being so utterly misinformed to think that Russia is losing the war. Let’s just see what somebody who actually has a clue thinks https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/the-darkness-ahead-where-the-ukraine

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Imagine listening to someone who is such an expert he said Russia is not stupid enough to invade Ukraine. Yet just a little while later he’s an expert again

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

Russia has been making the same claims against Ukraine since at least november 2022 in front of the UN.

Such an attack would benefit Ukraine since it’s more likely to cause NATO to get involved. Don’t forget that.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Which way is the wind blowing?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lol. You honestly think NATO countries wouldn’t check the story before comitting to an open conflict they don’t want to be in? That the people in all of Europe wouldn’t want to know who actually blew up the plant and spewed radioactivity over their lands? That everyone’s just gonna be fine shelling out ANOTHER couple of billions to clean up Chernobyl 2.0?

If this ever actually happens (Big IF) anyone who lies about it is gonna be completely fucked when the truth inevitably comes out.

Noone benefits from this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

NATO benefits the most in not getting directly involved. Don’t forget that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 122K

    Comments