Apple forced to ditch iPhone lightning charger::Apple confirms new iPhone 15 will have a common USB-C charging port after EU forces it into the change.

16 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Apple has confirmed its new iPhone will not feature its proprietary lightning charging port, after the EU forced it into the change.

The tech giant said that the iPhone 15, unveiled at its annual event on Wednesday, would use a USB-C cable as the “universally accepted standard”.

The EU had told the tech giant to ditch its proprietary charging ports to make life easier for consumers, save them money, and help reduce e-waste by encouraging re-use of chargers.

But some experts questioned whether consumers would be prepared to pay the high price tags given the devices are not hugely different to their predecessors.

“Convincing users to fork out for these new devices will not be easy during a cost-of-living crisis,” said Paolo Pescatore, analyst and founder of PP Foresight.

“Some will see the new features as incremental, [although] collectively they enhance the overall experience which is priceless among Apple’s core user base.”


The original article contains 457 words, the summary contains 152 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Good bot

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points

Thank fuck, the lightning charger is hot dogshit, IMO. Th lack of compatibility of iphone is annoying, particularly around how 3rd party charging cords won’t work with their products sometimes.

I had an iphone for over a decade, and finally switched to android. It suits me better. I spend a lot less time thinking ‘i should be able to do this’ and looking for a workaround

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Yeah the lightning charger in my experience immediately breaks when I put it in any position it just doesn’t like.

Edit: should clarify I use an Android now

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You’ll feel right at home with usb-c then. I use both every day and, honestly, they both suck.

But with Usb-c you get Power Delivery which kicks the shit out of old 5v 2a nonsense

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Just curious why you think USB C sucks? I think it’s gotten to a mature point now with PD 3.0 or 3.1. I have 1 cable next to my bed that will charge my phone, headphones, laptop, tablet etc. No worrying at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I find usb-c generally better. faster charging, as you’ve pointed out. I find the connections usually a lot more secure too. I have one cord in my car for android auto that’s a finicky little bitch, though, and I’m about to yeet that thing, if I ever remember to replace it. All of my other cords have held up well, and it’s really nice to have the ability to charge all of my devices with one cord.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I always feel like usbc could just flip out at any moment. I like the lightning connector better in that regard at least. Usbc just seems looser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A gorilla wrote this post

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can charge faster than 10W using Lightning to USB-C

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But with Usb-c you get Power Delivery

iPhones have supported the PD spec since 2017 (iPhone 8 and iPhone X), assuming the cable supports it (requiring USB-C to Lightning). Their big mistake was not shipping a PD-compatible charger and cable in the box, so very few users actually got one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve only ever had one lightning charger break. Been using iPhones for a decade.

…I do electrical tape and heat shrink the ends, though. So they probably helps a little.

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*

Base model 15 will still only have usb 2.0 speeds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Reminder:
usb 2 is a 2001 standard

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Apple sure is innovating

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

ok now im really curious, what are you plugging into your CELL PHONE that requires 10 gigabit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Obviously video. You must be an old fashion person that doesn’t record anything on their literally 4k HDR 60fps pocket camera. But I only back up all my stuff directly off my micro SD card because I don’t have 24h to empty all 128GB of it via USB 2.0.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’d be surprised how much vlogging and videography is performed with iPhones. Even LMG use one for GameLinked

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I had this question as well. I don’t think I’ve physically plugged my iPhone 11 in for data/photo/video syncing since I got it. Everything is super fast over wifi, there’s no reason for a cord. Only thing I use the port for is charging and sometimes audio. I’d probably have been fine if they dropped the port, but I’m happy they kept it for now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Anything that requires more than 53 MB/s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s because apple hasn’t released usb3.0 specs as a new invention yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The Pro version does have it.

Everything to push people into buying even more expensive shit, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The base 15 has the processor from the 14 pro, which does not have the USB 3.0 controller on it.

Just like the base 14 had the processor from the 13 pro …and the base 13 had the processor from the 12 pro

you get the idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Only good thing about Lightning was the connector itself, but USB-C is a much needed improvement. The speed thing though, that gets me, especially when non-flagship devices aren’t limited to 2.x speeds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Charger compatibility is a big thing. Back in the ancient days, sales men used to tell me to buy a Nokia phone because everyone had a Nokia charger at home. If you bought an Ericsson or Siemens, nobody could help you if you ran out of battery.

Well that didn’t last forever, since Nokia eventually decided to switch to a slim connection, but before that the compatibility was really good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
295 points

Regulations work. Suck it, predatory businesses. Literally, eat shit.

permalink
report
reply
-162 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Give over. They were passive aggressive as fuck in their statements after the EU mandated it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Eh, I don’t know Apple’s intentions but this specific design change isn’t that complicated. The lightning port still uses the USB protocol so the firmware will be the same or very similar. The supporting electronics also wouldn’t change much, but at most they’d omit/add a few small passives and slightly reroute that part of the circuit to make things fit together. They’d also have to lock down a large production run of USB ports, but any manufacturer would accommodate a customer as large as Apple. They’d need to test fit it with the new phone chassis but that’s relatively simple as well. Regulatory certification would also be smooth sailing for a change this simple, since most of what’s changing is simply the form factor.

I figure it would take two years before customers would see this design change from the moment engineering was assigned it.

I’m an electrical engineer who works in production if that matters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I can corroborate this. They weren’t unprepared, but this wasn’t late warning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Law was approved in 2022.

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points

They first started using USB c on the macbooks in 2015. There’s no way that it took 8 years to get it ready for the iPhone. In that time they’ve also released several other devices and accessories which have used lightning.

To me this doesn’t point to a planned gradual shift over to USB c but one that was forced by neccesity on the macbook then by regulation on the iPhone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-46 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

The narrative around Lightning was always that they’d keep it for 10 years and then move to something new, Schiller even called it “a modern connector for the next decade” when it was announced, and at the time it was better than anything else on the market.

No one who’s been paying attention is surprised that Apple switched this year and not next. I’d love to go dig up my years old comments on Reddit about this but like many of us I deleted my whole history. I had hoped they’d advance the timeline and release the 14 with USBC because of the EU regs, but I’m convinced this was the plan because they waited for the lighting to fulfill its 10 year target (just like with the 30 pin connector) and not until the EU regs actually forced them in 2024.

When the iPad switched to USBC in 2018 it was a foregone conclusion that iPhone would too, and the assumption was always for it to happen in 2023.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

This law is more than a decade in the making, the only reason it was on Apples roadmap is because of this law.

The EU doesn’t have to mandate a new connector when something new comes up, it just has to be an open standard, ANY open standard. This is miles better for everyone. And the EU doesn’t force the whole world to adapt their standard, it’s just not economical to produce different versions for different markets, but they are very much allowed to sell whatever to their non EU customers.

If you really want the lightning adapter back, you can ask one of the many people who soldered a usb-c connector in an iphone 12/13/14. If one person can do it, I’m pretty sure Apple can, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/1yudWXta6dM?si=Ly7bKl8lahT8Z2NM

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m sure the push for non proprietary standards before the latest EU rules had some part to play as well

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I think they wanted to go to usb-c (as that’s what all their other products use) but they didn’t want to face the backlash from customers when “all their cables and docks had to be changed again”. Luckily for apple the EU gave them a fall guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

If that was the case apple wouldn’t talk so openly about how that’s bad for the consumer. They want to keep Lightning since they want to control the iPhone accessory ecosystem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I know you didn’t mean it that way, but that is actually the best solution from a production side, which Cook is. Just change one line in the process. Instead of a lightning port, it’s a usbc port.

It’s a phone. I don’t know why everyone wants 40 Gbps. Not that you’ll ever get unless you pony up for a $100 cable.

With all that said, it was hilarious to see them talk about usb 2 and how 3 is 20x faster because that shit was straight out of 20 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Oh man you have not followed all of this progress have you? the EU has been pushing for this for a long time now, if this was their planall along Apple could have stated that they planned to do this in the future but that they were waiting for closure of their original connector, but they didn’t, all their communications until this decission was made have been that lightning was not going away. Suddenly, it was their plan all along. It’s… so much like apple to do this and so in line for their fans to eat it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Are people astroturfing here? Seriously? It may be one of the worst place for that, and it looks like a very bad troll.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They had until the beginning of 2024, that is by 2024 USB C had to be the standard, leaving Apple no choice with Iphones introduced in 2023’s fall.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If they were going to switch anyway, they wouldn’t have struggled until the EU had to make regulations around it.

Regulations means the market can’t regulate itself. The market in this case being Apple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
7 points

It’s cold in here.

Has hell frozen over?!?

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 556K

    Comments