241 points

“cannot use her own constitutional rights as a shield to violate the constitutional rights of others while performing her duties as an elected official”.

“It’s my right to deny your rights.”

Remeber these are the people shouting about religious freedoms.

permalink
report
reply
153 points
*

This is something that needs to shouted loud and clear.

The Constitution protects citizens from the government. If you work for the government, you are what the Constitution protects us from. If you do not understand that, you do not need to be getting a paycheck drawn from taxpayers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points
*

They literally believe the very existence of gay married couples is an assault on their religious freedom. The unchecked “religious freedom” they want logically would include bigamy and pedophilia, but better not talk about that.

Evangelicals and conservatives want to be protected by American laws but not bound by them, while everyone else is tightly bound by laws, but not protected by them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Rob Corddry did a Daily Show interview way back about the pharmacist and birth control (the abortion pill). The pharmacist kept saying about his right were being violated when the courts said he had to go against his beliefs. Rob sarcastically says (I’m paraphrasing), “yeah, how can they push their beliefs on you! that’s your job to do the customer!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

For conservatives “religious freedom” means their freedom to impose their religion on you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That sounds like a whole new take on “but but you’re being intolerant of intolerant people!”

They are different manifestations of the central “I get to be an asshole if I want but you can’t do anything about it”

permalink
report
parent
reply
136 points

She’ll just get crowdfunding money from Republicans (white domestic terrorists).

permalink
report
reply
118 points
*

I mean, either way it’s a win. If she gets $2 each from a shitload of right wing fuckheads, that means we made ~50,000 right wing fuckheads pay to support gay marriage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

That’s 50,000 people paying for the attempt at preventing gay marriage, not in support of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Paying for a failed attempt. So it’s kind of impotence squared if it happens.

That’s $100,000 that won’t get to those people unless somebody else raises it because I doubt very seriously Kim Davis has $100,000.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If only we could collect their names and tell everyone about how they feel!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

that number sounds too low.

assuming that the last election was 50% and that 50% of voters are republicans; about 70 million people could support her like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It wasn’t and they aren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I don’t care where she gets the money, as I’m delighted where the money is going.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Finally. We have the funds to enact the Gay Agenda©

Execute order 69.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That’s fine, victims get their money and some dumb cunt in Ohio is a little bit poorer. Sounds like a win-win to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Sounds like socialism to me

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I get the joke but to be clear, handouts are not a problem for these folks, so long as the Jesus Strings are fully attached.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Hey, have you written up your ‘Jesus Strings’ theory? You’ve mentioned it a few times and it makes marvelous intuitive sense to me — I’d like to read the article if you’re written it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Everyone has the right to follow their religion. If Big Kim didn’t want to disobey her God, she is allowed to: by resigning her position in protest and joining a monastery.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

I believe “Get thee to a nunnery.” might be appropriate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Good, fuck her, cunt.

On another topic, while I’m straight, if I were gay, I don’t think I’m prepared to date, let alone marry, someone with the same first name as me. Being gay is perfectly normal, marrying someone with the same first name as you isn’t. No judgement though, just don’t think I’m cut out for it.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Call Me by Our Name

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

SAY OUR NAME, SAY OUR NAME!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

New head-cannon for the Bobs in office space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

🤣🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wait what is this . did Kim marry Kim?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I dated a guy with the same name as me once, just went by my middle name while we were together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That makes sense. You’re made of sterner stuff than I am though, I wouldn’t be able to hack it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

XD I’m straight and my name is Aaron. I could never be with an Erin. There’s just something weird about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I feel ya bro

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

So judge David B ruled Kim Davis had to pay David E and David M 50k each. .

I was not aware there were so many Dave’s involved.

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

These are the Daves that I know I know, these are the Daves I know. Some of them go by David but most of them just go by Dave. They all have different hands but come from different moms

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have this song on my phone so I can listen to it whenever I please!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Dave’s not here…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Basically… a portion of each of the David’s legal fees

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 524K

    Comments