229 points

I am hesitant to put my hands on the chest of a woman who hasn’t given consent.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

Understandable, but you only need to do it if there is no pulse. If you are doing chest compressions to save their life, I am sure the majority would be quite happy with not dying. You don’t need to take off their top, and you are pressing on their sternum rather than their breasts. You can’t really mistake CPR for anything else if you are doing it correctly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m pretty sure most places in the states have laws protecting people but there have been people who were sued for giving cpr to someone who wasn’t very grateful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Good Samaritan laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You don’t need to take off their top

Well, you do if using AED. Tom Scott has video on those too: https://youtu.be/ecVHYg4_vZw

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I know, but I was just assuming chest compressions, no other tools. If you’re strapping electrodes to an unconscious person, and the machine is talking you through the CPR steps, it’s even less likely to be assumed to be anything than what it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

CPR does not save lives. It preserves a dead body until an AED or ambulance can bring it back to life. You need to remove her shirt and often bra (if there is a wire it must go, otherwise only if in the way) to use an AED so if some item of clothing is in the way don’t worry about removing it.

Note that the above is generic CPR training that doesn’t respect local laws which can say something different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

AED’s will not help someone whose heart is stopped (i.e. no pulse). They are used to shock the heart into restoring its normal rhythm. It will not start a heart that has stopped beating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

CPR absolutely does save lives. The success rate outside hospitals is around 10%. That’s thousands of lives saved every year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Please do not say CPR does not save lives, it 100% does. And in the United States our Good Samaritan laws protect anyone from liability if they are acting in good faith trying to help someone.

I’m a paramedic in the United States, hold a certification as a flight medic, nothing I can bring, in a helicopter or an ambulance will do anything for anyone if high quality CPR isn’t performed.

To break things down, yes in adults early defibrillation does make a huge difference but in kids it is literally high quality CPR that saves them. If you’d like I’d be happy to break down the details of resuscitation, but without CPR until I can get there and attempt resuscitation, then no matter how much I throw at someone to try to get their heart beating again, they’ll still be brain dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You can’t, that doesn’t mean that some white knight in the crowd doesn’t.

While I agree the risk is low, it’s not zero.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Youre afraid to save a persons life because there is a near zero chance that a very unlikely hypothetical situation may occur? Youre okay with letting someone die because you might get verbally chided, or worse, have someone misunderstand and be slightly rough with you? Wow.

I honestly can’t imagine being this scared of the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
125 points

One of the few cases where consent of anything can be assumed is lifesaving of a person unable to respond. One of the first steps of cpr is to seek a response to ensure that the person is unconscious before then confirming no pulse.

But yeah I get why it’s awkward

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

onsent of lifesaving attempts can be assumed, not of anything

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

Yeah but the mob around me watching me touch her breasts might not know that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

I’m not CPR certified or anything, but I think if you’re just grabbing titties you’re probably doing it wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

The instructors advise you to speak aloud your actions as you do them. Also helps if you have already levelled out instructions to the rent a crowd to perform specific tasks like send for help and get the defib and you three who said yes to cpr training let’s line up and take turns doing cpr.

…of course, the training to be comfortable giving these instructions is not really done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

If you’re touching her tits, you’re not giving proper CPR. Proper CPR happens just below the sternum. That’s well below any kind of bra band. If her tits are that low, she’s either an EE cup or 80 years old.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Then put whichever Karen looks fiercest in charge of compressions. Either she’ll get in there and do them, or she’ll demur, in which case you say you will and she should watch so she can start when you get tired. That makes her your witness. Don’t forget to tell someone else to call emergency services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

COWS. “Can you here me?” “Open your eyes.” “What’s your name?” “Squeeze my hands.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I am hesitant to put my hands on the chest of a person who hasn’t given consent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Someone who has no heartbeat automaticlly has given consent to receive CPR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not necessarily. Being unable to give consent doesn’t mean you consent. Also being dead doesn’t mean you consent either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you’re doing CPR they’re effectively dead before you start. If you’re the only one there, no witnesses unless you manage to save her. If you’re not alone, you should tell them you’re going to start CPR and order them to call 911 or 999 or whatever. Or volunteer to call while they start compressions. Then you can take over/take turns and vouch for each 's intentions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If you have cpr or aed training…and a person is unconscious, consent is implied. Especially if you follow training. You felt for a pulse and/or they were not breathing, you will not get sued in this country. If someone manages to get it to court, they will lose.

I am a certified CPR and AED , a registered WFR and just had a training class on the matter. As long as you follow proper protocol you are ok. And I’d like to add, as a man, yeah, I’d be nervous also exposing a womans chest in a crowd, people are stupid, but you can probably save a life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

The more significant finding here is 40% of people don’t get CPR - I think this mostly comes down to public ignorance. It’s not like most schools make their students CPR certified. I got mine through Boyscouts, but a lot of people don’t really get that kind of education.

I wouldn’t be surprised if that explains the gender difference, too. Due to ignorance a lot of people might not really grasp the difference between chest compressions and fondling someone’s chest 🙄

permalink
report
reply
34 points

In germany, you need to take an 8 hour first aid course to get your driver’s license.

It’s better than nothing, but it’s been 5 years for me and I’m not sure if I could still do it properly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Which is another reason why drivers licenses and the FA course should be repeated every few years.

The amount of people who don’t understand road laws or misremember them is insane

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I fully agree. People seem to forget that they are controlling 1.5 tons of steel at a ridiculous speeds and can easily kill someone if they move their hand just a bit too far.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And still my first aid teacher to get my German driver’s license said that the survival rate for people whose heart stops is worse in Germany than the US

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Did they give numbers or define survival?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know maybe because I keep it fresh in my mind for my job but it’s really simple. If you look up emd cpr (proqa) instructions they give yoy very good simple steps to follow depending on how you answer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

One of the beliefs is also the education of CPR is taught on male-form mannequins and that’s how folks are taught anatomical landmarks. Many people don’t actually know how to find the correct location to compress when breasts are present apparently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

There’s more to it than that. CPR certifications only last two years (at least in the US) and there’s also the liability included with performing CPR that they cover in the class. If you perform CPR but are found to not have a current certification then you can get in a heap of financial debt as your not truly covered by the protections the certification can provide you, mainly around the “permission” to perform the act. Ribs can be broken and lungs can be punctured simply by performing CPR normally with the required amount of pressure needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In most cases good Samaritan laws protect people performing CPR regardless of certification.

Though yes, in my ideal world everyone would have up-to-date training paid for by the State.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Call 911 and then follow the instructions of the operator who is trained in teaching CPR over the phone in these situations, and knows the latest. That you had training means you are more likely to understand instructions given ,and if not you were following directions of someone else.

You need to call 911 anyway. CPR is only performed on dead people, you need an AED (or similar tools in an ambulance) to bring someone back to life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Calling 911 is the right way to go. Activating emergency response system. And if you don’t make sure someone else does and tells you they have. So many times people assume someone else called and no one has.

There was a push at one point in time to teach bystander CPR, which focuses on compressions at a rate of 100-120 a minute with a little less focus on landmarks and more “middle of the chest and go”. It also taught that people typically have about 20 minutes of reserve oxygen in their venous system and that compressions continuously increased survivability by keeping the circulation going through compressions. Considering average ems response time in the US, it seemed to reduce confusion and encouraged more community response (not wanting to do mouth to mouth is a fear people have). Not sure if it’s still being taught, but it was fairly well received at the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Call 911 yes, but if you have training, tell them to stfu and let you do it. They try to have you count out loud with them, but the delay over the phone makes you go off rhythm constantly. I threw the phone across the room when I was giving CPR to my dad. He didn’t make it, and I often wonder if it was because of the shitty beginning of the CPR regimen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Good Samaritan laws would protect you from that, no?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I got mine through Boyscouts, but a lot of people don’t really get that kind of education.

Unless you’re a kid or a den mom, you don’t have CPR training. It only lasts a few years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

Well, no, I have expired training. That’s still better than literally nothing, it’s not like the knowledge just vanishes. I think I could follow the 911 operator’s instructions pretty well.

… though actually, yeah, I probably should fix that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah you’re right, it’s definitely better than nothing. And yea you should take another course - it’s fun! Different instructors have different styles and highlight different things/experiences. I just renewed recently and was surprised at how fuzzy I was on some of the pop questions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Well maybe she has a boyfriend

permalink
report
reply
334 points

One time, I put my hand out to stop a kid from running into the street.

Most people were like “Woah that kid almost died.” But one Karen looking woman had a “How dare you touch that child” look.

I’m not going to stop saving kids who run into the street. But it did make me question when to involve myself or not. And I can see a lot of people hesitating because some fuckface has something stupid to say.

permalink
report
reply
-101 points

You inferred one look from a stranger experiencing a traumatic event, that apparently wasn’t reinforced by conversation with her after the fact!? I don’t think you should modify anything about your instincts or responses…

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

You psychoanalyzed him from one comment on an Internet forum without a single reply or anything?

See how that sounds?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-53 points

Uh, no? No one’s analyzing here! I basically told them to trust their instincts, rather than defer to the minority opinion of “all men are pedophiles” (based on their interpretation of the Karen’s response). Same advice I would give male lifeguards who would hesitate in possibly saving a life because maybe one person would be hyper-sensitive to any contact. Do what’s good and true and right immediately, and deal with haters later…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh boy…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

Don’t you know? Every woman who is middle aged and doesn’t give an appreciating look all the time I want is a misandrist Karen. And if someone dies, it’s her and other women’s fault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

All it takes is one person to accuse you for your life to be ruined. Such is the reality of being a man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Accusations ruin plenty of people’s lives, regardless of gender.

permalink
report
parent
reply
127 points

Yep. People have strange selective views on things.

I was standing with the car at the crossing where it enters the main road. A kid came racing down the bike path from the local primary school on his scooter and tried to get around my car without wasting speed, i.e. slowing down. Physics said: “NO” in no uncertain terms, and the kid kissed the road in front of my car. I got out to help, but he already got up, probably more annoyed about loosing speed than anything else, answered negative on my inquiry if he was hurt or needed help, and was off like lighting.

Two days later, the police was at my door, responding to a neighbors claim that I had run over a kid that day…

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I could imagine that neighbour just heard some noise, looked outside, and then just concluded, you must’ve hit that child, from what the aftermath looked like…

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Exactly. As much as I believe in being a good person and trying to stop others from coming to harm, there is now a not-nonsignificant chance that I end up being prosecuted for something as a result of stepping in to attempt to save a life. It deincentivizes such activities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I’ll reference this comment in the trial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
102 points

A man stopped my son with his hand from crossing at the signal because a car didn’t see him and could have mowed him down. I think a lot about how that could have gone badly if the man had second guessed himself for even a moment. Legally and socially, we need to be on the side of anyone who makes a split second decision to help in a crisis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

We are, it’s called Good Samaritan laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Nah man. I won’t go near kids. Not my problem… If they die because of stupidity… it’s just thinning the heard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
119 points

Some US states do not have Good Samaritan laws. This means that you could save someone’s life, they could sue you, and they could win. It’s pretty fucked up.

permalink
report
reply
81 points

This sounded strange to me, so I looked it up. This Wikipedia article suggests all US states have a good samaritan law, and some extend that further by requiring bystanders to reasonably provide assistance. However, who is liable and to what extent appears to vary. Additionally, interactions with other state laws could complicate things.

All that said, I admittedly don’t know much about good samaritan laws beyond this article.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Huh Wisconsin is a duty to rescue state

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“I didn’t see anything.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Some of those laws are more recent, I believe. I got CPR certified in the 90s and the police officer instructing the course did indeed warn us to be careful about saving people as we could possibly get sued.

If I had to guess, it was a symptom of the sue-everyone-for-everything craze in those days, crossed with state laws that didn’t yet provide explicit protections for good samaritans because you generally don’t try to harm someone who went out of their way to save your life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do you have expiring CPR qualifications, or are they valid for life?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

It’s fully possible that the cop instructing the course didn’t know the law at all, especially a federal law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

FYI if you look at the actual numbers, that frivolous lawsuit situation was manufactured by the media. Lawsuits have been in near continuous decline since that narrative started.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m currently certified and we are told that unconscious means consent and once you determine they’re not breathing (only criteria) then you perform cpr. I’ve been certified for over 7 years as a dispatcher and we often provide these exact instructions. Since we deal with the whole of the US we use national protocols which are valid throughout the country (emd epd protocols) and unless you know for SURE they are breathing you perform CPR every time. Doesn’t matter if they have a DNR. Unless of course they just had a seizure then you wait. But if you can’t confirm breathing or you say they’re snoring we are going straight to chest compressions. I’ve been trained by some of the most knowledgeable people who I was lucky to have the privilege to learn from. This training has served me very well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

We need to ask Jackie Chiles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

There’s no state that requires you to do more than a 911 call to report the emergency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That depends. If you are a professional you may be required to do more. Professional includes being on the office emergency team.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Can I get some qualifications so I can send them a bill, if this happens?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

At least here, the good Samaritan law specifically excepts people that are receiving compensation for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Every state has something.

But that only provides legal protection from lawsuits after the fact; generally, they require that you act in a reason way, in the scope of your training (or under direction of say 911 dispatch,)

Some will also mandate that you call 911 immediately- though no state requires more than that

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

My understanding of it is that CPR has a lot of negative side effects that we’re usually not told about or aware of, like cracking or breaking a rib during compressions.

Not that this is in any way good, but I think some have successfully sued their saviors due to complications from CPR.

I think a law should be passed that says you can’t sue someone for complications of saving your life, but, you know…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

@OceanSoap @alienanimals Sounds like it’s time to push for Good Samaritan laws in every state. We have one in California. And yes, there can be side effects, but these aren’t limited to GSs. Medical personnel can inflict them as well (damage with intubation comes to mind), and if the injuries are consistent with life saving measures, they are protected. Why shouldn’t GSs also be covered?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Throw in that CPR is effective in 10% of situations and maybe there are reasons why people don’t act. 10% is wayyy better than 0% so it is always worth trying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m cpr certified and was told this during training. Maybe it’s not general population knowledge though.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 524K

    Comments