96 points

File this under examples of why there are no good apples.

permalink
report
reply
66 points

“You don’t have anything to fear from the police if you’re not doing anything wrong” Really? REALLY? They are literal terrorists. I give you, exhibit….what do we do when we run out of letters anyway?

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Also: deputy gangs are a thing. Literal gangs within the police force.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

Yep, great example of a department with an extensive history of this is the LAPD Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, which was the subject of this fifteen part long form investigation that was also made into a podcast

And that’s just one example and one we know about

e; updated podcast link to a source the author provided

e2; County Sheriff’s Department, not city police like I’d initially misremembered

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not that there aren’t gangs in the LAPD this investigation is specifically about the Los Angeles sheriff’s department.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Exhibit ACAB.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Well played.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

There is an in-group that the law protects, but does not bind. There is an out-group that the law binds, but does not protect.

permalink
report
reply
-33 points
*

He was convinced and his leniency is due to lack of direct involvement and being young. His sentence is house arrest.

All of this is in the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Lack of direct involvement? He showed up! He stole a riot shield! He maced people! He pushed towards breaking into the capitol!

What more do you need???

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Well if he had tweeted about arming yourself to defend our nation from an insurrection he’d get years, like another Floridian: Daniel Baker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Sounds like will be perfect for the police

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I am telling you what the judge considered in his judgment, not what I think about this person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

a “lack of direct involvement” would be something like showing up to the Capitol to protest, happening to be right in the gray area between the peaceful protestors and the violent ones, and getting rounded up by the capitol police who mistook you for one of the violent ones.

Stealing a riot shield and macing people is the textbook definition of direct involvement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

He maced his own people, so as far as I’m concerned he’s incompetent enough to be halfway to an ally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Kids will be kids! They do dumb stuff all the time like busting mailboxes, tagging grafitti, stealing road signs, and stealing a riot shield during an insurrection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Lmao I can’t wait til my kids come home and announce they MAY have committed some light treason

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I already know the answer, but how does this not completely disqualify him from being a cop?

permalink
report
reply
23 points

And why would other cops want to work with a guy who was part of a group that attacked cops?

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Some of those that work forces, are the same that burn crosses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

cause they see him as a martyr for the cause.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
*

WHEN (not if) these right wing fucks try to over throw the government again, we will only have ourselves to blame for it.

These traitors should have been given the harshest penalties possible - put them up as an example to deter others. Instead, example after example, these POS are given slaps on the wrist. We are essentially encouraging others to try again because the general public has forgotten about this event, the media never took this as seriously as they should have, and various government agencies not escalating the punishments being levied.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

They’ll all wear their prison sentences as badges in 5 years. You’re looking at future senate candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It would have been a massive difference if those fucks were getting 10 or 20 or more sentences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

we will only have ourselves to blame

“We” who? I didn’t vote for any of these dicks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But did you vote against them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s reconstruction all over again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Longer sentences don’t deter crimes. What deters crimes is certainty of being caught. We need to get them ALL, even if it’s for a little bit.

https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/247350.pdf

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments