lemm.ee

3 points

3 months ago

You know that vinyl is not the only way of recording analog information, right?

report

Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu

[ - ]

5 points

3 months ago

There is also cassette tapes, reels, wax cylinders, laser discs… Analog supports degrade over time. Digital files do not.

report

[ - ]

pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io

1 point

3 months ago

True, but analog cylinders are going to be the ones people after the world burns can find and still listen. I wouldn’t count any old CDs play at that point anymore.

Like analog degrades, digital just stops playing.

report

[ - ]

1 point

3 months ago

Digital storage devices have way shorter lifespans than analog ones. Digital information can be more reliably copied, but we are constantly losing massive amounts of information to digital storage loses when it falls out of public consciousness. If no one is actively copying it, it is doomed in the digital age. We still have analog storage that’s good enough to be useful from thousands of years ago.

report

SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone

[ - ]

7 points

3 months ago

Digital files have checksums. You literally know when something has changed and you lost information. And then you have error-correction on top.

report

[ - ]

2 points

3 months ago

How do you think that is in any way even remotely relevant to what I said? If the drive your file is on dies and you didn’t copy it to another one a checksum won’t help you.

report

[ - ]

volodya_ilich@lemm.ee

1 point

3 months ago

And if your vinyl collection catches fire it also gets lost, what’s your point? That’s an argument for preservation of storage media, not for intrinsic benefits of analog.

report

[ - ]

1 point

3 months ago

You cannot possibly be this stupid. I refuse to believe it. If you stuff a vinyl record in a cabinet for a century, you’ll still have a mostly functional recording. If you stuff an SSD in a cabinet for a decade you’ll probably just have a paperweight at the end, and that’s comparing 70 year old analog storage technology to the current standard of digital storage. This is a consistent pattern throughout all of history. Analog storage is just far, far more robust to data loss. All the error-correction in the world doesn’t help if you aren’t actually running that error-correction constantly forever. That is the entire point I’ve been trying to make this whole time that everyone just keeps ignoring to spout non sequiturs about how digital data transmission works at me.

report

Show more comments

[ - ]

the_tab_key@lemmy.world

2 points

3 months ago

The analog storage you are referring to from thousands of years ago has degraded substantially since its creation. Yes it’s still useful but I wouldn’t use that as evidence it’s a better medium. Case in point: texts (a digital storage form) from thousands of years ago can be retransacribed to be exact copies of the original (with respect to the knowledge contained within of course) whereas paintings from the Renaissance have changed dramatically due to aging and can never be returned to their original form since the needed data is lost.

report

[ - ]

1 point

3 months ago

What makes you think we are perfectly copying the knowledge contained in texts from thousands of years ago? That is… a bold claim. Even if I were to accept that text is always inherently digital for the sake of argument, the storage medium is absolutely analog. You can use analog storage to store digital data just as much as you can use digital storage to store analog data like sound waves.

report

[ - ]

the_tab_key@lemmy.world

1 point

3 months ago

One example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iliad?wprov=sfla1

Yes, you’ll make the argument that the available versions of it are not perfect representations, though that is only because the language and dialect used to produce the work had been lost, the work otherwise remains intact.

Text is a digital format because you have a limited set of characters to represent sounds/syllables. For example: the meaning of the letter ‘B’ doesn’t change if a small piece of the letter is missing or if the letter is slightly tilted, it’s still a ‘B’. If the format was analog, those changes would also change the sound/meaning of the word.

report

[ - ]

1 point

3 months ago

Okay, it’s not really the point I’m trying to make here, but since you bring it up, actually it does matter that we lose the ability to decipher the meaning of digital storage. That is a problem that has only gotten worse.

More importantly, there is meaning in handwriting. We can learn things from how different people wrote the same thing. And people do try to convey subtleties of meaning through drawing the same letter in different ways, and of course, most importantly, you completely ignored the actual point I was trying to make, that even if we ignore that and assume every B is always the same we aren’t talking about content. We are talking about storage media. Smearing ink on paper isn’t a digital process even if you’re literally just writing 1s and 0s. There have been digital ways of storing information for as long as there have been analog ones. Things like beads or knots in ropes. The reason you never hear about them isn’t because they didn’t exist. It’s because all the information they contain has decayed to nonsense. Digital is very binary that way. It’s perfectly retrievable until it’s perfectly gone. We have a lot of techniques now to help extend that useful life, but they still all require active maintenance, and most digital storage media has an average lifespan in single digit years. Even for digital information, the oldest stuff we still have around was stored in analog ways.

report

[ - ]

1 point

3 months ago

Eh. Archival-grade optical discs stored in near-ideal conditions should have a useful lifespan of 1000+ years. Most of the analog storage media, even under near-ideal conditions, are likely far less than that. Is most of the digital information being stored on archival-grade optical discs? No. Will we be able to read them in 100+ years? Probably also no, since we already can’t access some of the data from the Apollo missions because computer architecture has changed so radically. And that’s probably the biggest single drawback to digital music storage; since the way files are being written and accessed keeps changing, eventually the old standards won’t be supported any more. As it is, there are probably a lot of minidiscs out there that no one can read anymore, since minidisc has gone the way of the dodo and passenger pigeon.

report