You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

We aren’t in a civil war in America right now. There is no basis to take action against modern fascists outside of the numerous acts of domestic terrorism they commit. Rounding up fascists solely based on their political views make us like the Nazis and is unbecoming of any free society.

People who are trying to start a pogrom on trans people, Jewish people, etc should be prosecuted actually, regardless of whether they’re actually successful. You can’t wait for the nazis to win before you crush them, by that point it will be too late.

Not the USSR, China, or North Korea which is what I was referring to by authoritarian communists.

What about these countries governments are different structurally from Cuba’s government?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

People who are trying to start a pogrom on trans people, Jewish people, etc should be prosecuted actually, regardless of whether they’re actually successful. You can’t wait for the nazis to win before you crush them, by that point it will be too late.

Two wrongs don’t make a right. If we go that route we are going to become the thing we are trying to prevent.

What about these countries governments are different structurally from Cuba’s government?

Rather than a difference in government structure, I would point to a difference in leadership. I personally believe Castro really did believe in socialism and had the best interests of the Cuban people at heart. As great as that is, a system of government that depends on the benevolence of its leaders is not one I want to live under.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Two wrongs don’t make a right. If we go that route we are going to become the thing we are trying to prevent.

No, we will become people who suppress nazis, which is not the same as being a nazi. For an allegory, killing a serial killer in self defense (but before he actually kills you, gasp) does not make you a serial killer.

Rather than a difference in government structure, I would point to a difference in leadership. I personally believe Castro really did believe in socialism and had the best interests of the Cuban people at heart. As great as that is, a system of government that depends on the benevolence of its leaders is not one I want to live under.

So why don’t you believe any of the other leaders believed in socialism?

Also this is great man theory taken to an extreme.

Also I dont know how you can look at any of their government structures and claim that the people were reliant on the benevolence of the leadership.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For an allegory, killing a serial killer in self defense (but before he actually kills you, gasp) does not make you a serial killer.

While this is a true statement it does not follow that preventive actions against people who hold fascist views, but do not act on them, is anyway different what the Nazis did to people.

So why don’t you believe any of the other leaders believed in socialism?

The USSR Politburo only cared about itself. Same with the CCP and the Kim family. These are extractive institutions that are only self serving. They are not beholden to anyone so they have no incentive to care what the people want.

Also this is great man theory taken to an extreme.

He didn’t get the right to lead from inherently being a great man. He got it by leading his people in a revolution against a dictator. His policies benefited enough people so they continued support him. Castro actions were based on his personal moral compass. The fact Cuba didn’t become like North Korea is great. If Cubans aren’t giving meaningful mechanisms for dissent going forward, they will have little recourse to prevent their government from becoming like the Kim regime.

permalink
report
parent
reply