200 points

He’s already lost, this trial is only to determine how much it will cost him. I think it’s more that he’s realized how bad his attorneys are, and that he’s going to lose everything.

permalink
report
reply
145 points
*

And to think, all he had to do was not run for president of the United States (among many other things) and this probably never would have happened to him.

I mean, I’ve never run for president of the United States, it’s a very easy thing to not do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points
*

He also could have, you know, not crimed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
103 points

Could he, though? Really?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Be reasonable

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

That’s a lot harder to not do. Much easier to not run for president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points
*

Seriously. Had he not ran, or dropped out early, he could have probably started his own fringe news channel and lived a relatively unchanged, trouble free life and probably made some money doing it.

I personally think he expected to lose and wasn’t expecting the Russians to barely tip the scales to eek out an electoral college victory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Same here. There’s a photo of him on election night as his win was being declared. Everyone around him looks happy, but he looks like he was just told he has 2 weeks to live.

Had Trump lost to Hillary, he would have done the whole “they stole the election from me” shtick. He’d have launched Trump Tirade Hour where he’d rant about the latest political topics - criticizing the people in charge and declaring that he’d solve everything so easily.

Of course, like his health care plan, Trump would never give details on HOW he’d fix everything. It would just be “A is doing B to fix complex problem C. That’s the wrong thing to do. If I was in charge, I’d fix the complex problem easily by… whoops, looks like it’s time for a commercial break!” It would really have been the best job for him. It would have fit his skills of being an armchair critic that understands nothing and yet claims to know more than anyone else.

Sadly, he won and did the whole “I know better than anyone else despite not understanding anything” from the most powerful seat on the planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I can imagine a world where Trumps publicity presidential run starts spinning out and Jared/Ivanka start pulling strings to make it happen. Jared walked away with untold billions and just walks away unscathed. It’s disgusting, especially when you think of how the GOP will stop at nothing to bury Hunter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They are desperate to show the Dems are just as bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But he wants to look cool in front of his friends.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-43 points

Respectfully, I hope you are wrong.

If not running was all it took not to be prosecuted then, to me, that says this is indeed a political prosecution and not about the rule of law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points
*

I think they meant not run the first time? As in: he doesn’t run, and therefore doesn’t get elected, so he stays away from the spotlight and can, relatively, quietly live his life with his foot in his mouth at every turn, but nobody cares because he’s a D list celebrity.

And of course, not being the president, he has no access to half of the shit he’s dealing with federally. I feel like the state stuff in NY was a pretty long time coming, but the federal stuff could’ve been avoided had he lost or not ran in 2016.

I don’t even know what a world like that would look like, but I’m sure it would’ve been better than the four years we had of him.

Edit: Mobile, misspelled some things due to autocorrect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

When you run for president, you get the spotlight, but you also get a magnifying glass…

And in THAT mixed metaphor:

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

as president he had access to much higher level criming, which is why he is now in the trouble he is in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Oh no, I agree with you. I was just making a joke. From what I understand he never really wanted to run for president in the first place, and was surprised he won. Honestly his business might have continued as it was, fraud and everything, if he had never done that plus all the other crazy stuff he did.

I’ve very glad he’s getting what’s coming to him. I mean he brought this on himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think they mean for the first presidency. Had he not run for president and won via the electoral college, he never would’ve been in a position to commit a lot of the crimes he’s in trouble for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Oh no, I agree with you. I was just making a joke. From what I understand he never really wanted to run for president in the first place, and was surprised he won. Honestly his business might have continued as it was, fraud and everything, if he had never done that plus all the other crazy stuff he did.

I’ve very glad he’s getting what’s coming to him. I mean he brought this on himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

He might have maybe still been persecuted but the feds and everyone involved would have taken their sweet time investigating potentially a few more years since he’s still an ex president. Officially convicting him makes the office look bad and could potentially turn ugly with the MAGA supporters. Nobody wants jan6 2.0 and they very well might have been happy to let him fade into obscurity if that was deemed the best strategy to avoid civil unrest as a whole. Him putting himself in the spotlight again lit a fire under everyones ass and accelerated things drastically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points
*

he’s realized how bad his attorneys are

Maybe he should have paid or listened to the first dozen sets of lawyers he went through.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

He’s almost certainly going to appeal whatever verdict he gets, claiming that he had ineffective legal council and that the judge was biased against him. Because the only effective reason you can appeal is if you don’t believe your trial was fair. So he’s basically stacking the “this trial was unfair” deck in his favor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
94 points

I hate to be that guy, but you can’t appeal on ineffective assistance of counsel in a civil proceeding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Since when has something being legal or not ever stopped Trump from trying it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

“My trial was unfair!”

“On what grounds?”

“I made it unfair for myself!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Your honor, I object!

And why is that?

Because it’s devastating to my case!

https://youtu.be/St_Abko0Jfs?si=Yb8ma4gk_Aezw_IR

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

💀

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

RBG was too ______ to retire as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This oversight was first reported over two weeks ago, yet he hasn’t mentioned it or taken action in any way. Wonder if that would have an effect on such an appeal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think it would because it is unlikely this case would have been granted a jury trial anyway due to New York law. There are specific requirements for requesting a civil jury trial in New York, and all the legal analysis I have seen has suggested they would not have met that bar.

Jury Trials are onerous on the public and the judicial system, but are fundamentally necessary as well as guaranteed in criminal proceedings. However, for civil matters that is the exception rather than the rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Even if he did appeal, would that delay execution of the resulting court order?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

he’s going to lose everything.

He’s going to send out a new round of “save our country” money-raising emails and every one of his cult members are basically going to bail his ass out of this again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah but surely there must be diminishing returns, or at least there’s a somewhat finite pool to draw from. Like as case after case goes bad why would anyone keep giving him money?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You would think. But it keeps happening. Maybe this will be the final straw?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Just to clarify, that makes it sound like it is political. It is not although I don’t think you meant to imply it was.

Running for president just put him under the microscope like it should. Lots of illegal stuff came out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points

I will never get tired of all this losing.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

I would be happy with just one loss that actually sticks.

I feel like all I read is, “Trump is really in trouble this time!” - but all I actually hear is Waylon Jennings saying, “Boy that Donald sure is in a heap ah trouble.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

He really is the best at losing, no one loses like he does, they say they do but they don’t he is the best loser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Big strong men, with tears in their eyes, come up to him to say how great he is at losing!

permalink
report
parent
reply
107 points

Trump knows he can’t win in a court of law, so he wants to win in the court of public opinion, where a con-man like him actually has some leverage over the gullible.

permalink
report
reply
78 points

Even if he loses, he will suffer no significant consequences, nor will the lawless movement that supports him.

He could lose all of these cases tomorrow, and it still wouldn’t mean a thing. He could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot someone, and there still would be no significant consequences.

The GOP are a lawless terrorist movement, but everyone else wants to “take the high road.”

permalink
report
reply
69 points

Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump has already suffered huge consequences of losing his business license in NY and having his business go into receivership. In addition to the expected $250 million fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

True. This is literally the corporate death penalty. His corporate assets may have to be sold to pay the debts. They will not get much, as the brand name will have to be changed. It’s the worst thing that could happen to a business owner.

He will not be poor, but may end up with his name on worse buildings. Houston TX vs. Manhattan. And you know he doesn’t want to leave NYC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

We don’t want him in Houston either. Take that shit to San Antonio.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That still remains to be seen.

He’s losing in a big way with these NY cases. There’s a strong chance that he’ll never be able to do business in NY again, which means a lot of work restructuring his businesses. It’s a pretty big hit and will take a lot of time and money to resolve.

The election cases will be held next year, and will determine whether or not he sees jail time. I still have high hopes that we’ll see him behind bars in the next couple of years. These cases just take time because of the ramifications if the DOJ gets them wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*

If the Democrats/Progressives take the low road to beat the Republicans at their own game, isn’t that just one team winning over another team? Whereas if you’re fighting for ideals then you’re going to end up taking the high road a lot

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The ideal I’m fighting for is not being labelled a child sex offender and executed by the government because of my rainbow lapel pin. I’m open to higher ideals but when one side says we need to be “eliminated” I’m probably gonna tolerate a lot from the people who are trying to stop them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

“Take the high road” in this case means “treat treasonous criminals with kid gloves because they’re supported by the GOP.” If everything had been done by the book, Trump would have been in prison a long time ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I was operating on a different interpretation of “taking the high road”. In the way you are describing it, I agree with you completely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The terrorists on the right need to be met - unfailingly - with unwavering resistance. And when they get violent, we have to stop them. That doesn’t mean making a press release saying “we condemn in the strongest possible terms blah blah…” That means rounding up the violent actors and locking them away from civilized society.

Conservatives used to say that “tough on crime” should mean “tough on criminals.” Well when the GOP are criminals, the law needs to get touch on them.

Currently they aren’t scared of anything, because most of the other violent people sympathize with them. If they are going to wreck our Capitol and dismantle our freedoms, it’s time for another Sherman’s March, and finish the work that we started in Reconstruction.

They speak openly of killing the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. And anyone else they don’t like. They need to be scared of doing that, and we have to beat them to a pulp in order to make that happen - because that’s the only language that thugs understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Let’s everyone take a moment and collectively laugh at the sad little coward that’s downvoting all the comments for making fun of their beloved hero.

No rebuttals. No arguments in defense- just butt-hurt worthless downvotes.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Imagine how sad it would be to have a sex offender as your hero.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You new here?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 477K

    Comments