17 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
2 points

After the final fight was over and the dust had settled, a faint robotic female voice could be heard on a full moon at midnight if you repeat “this technology is way too widely used for how little bandwidth it can reliably carry it’s just not good for data transfer or high quality audio/video” three times….

ze Blueeetoooth device is ready to peaarr

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Bluetooth is, not a joke, named after King Harald Bluetooth. He was a viking, who united many Norse tribes, you know with all the pillaging they are known for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Oh wow you’re serious

The name “Bluetooth” was proposed in 1997 by Jim Kardach of Intel, one of the founders of the Bluetooth SIG. The name was inspired by a conversation with Sven Mattisson who related Scandinavian history through tales from Frans G. Bengtsson’s The Long Ships, a historical novel about Vikings and the 10th-century Danish king Harald Bluetooth. Upon discovering a picture of the runestone of Harald Bluetooth in the book A History of the Vikings by Gwyn Jones, Kardach proposed Bluetooth as the codename for the short-range wireless program which is now called Bluetooth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If something is invented as a direct replacement it should be known as Forkbeard for Harald’s son, Sweyn Forkbeard

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I know someone that would use a microwave to heat up food. But would literally run away from it whenever she used it and only come back after the set time passed.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

That is at least somewhat logical, if not a bit overly paranoid. A microwave can cause damage if the shielding is damaged, wifi cant ever cause damage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Most microwaves (especially old ones) are shielded very poorly. However microwave radiation is nonionizing so the only harm it is going to do to you is burns if you get hit by enough of it. Needless to say you aren’t going to get hit by that much no matter how poorly shielded your microwave is. The worst any consumer microwave will do is screw up your wifi reception around it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It could….

If you stuck your head next to a router 24/7 for years with it blasting at full power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Most consumer grade routers (and enterprise grade access points for that matter) are unable to produce more than 1W. Even with a higher gain factory antenna you might be radiating maybe 30W. There is no conceivable length of time that you could be exposed to that radiation and suffer ill effects from it. I’d be surprised if it was even enough heat the air around it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

No, radio waves are not ionizing. (Unlike, for example, ultraviolet or X-ray.) Ionizing radiation can cause cumulative damage, because each photon quanta has enough energy to potentially change organic molecules. But low frequencies such as radio waves, (anything lower than visible light) can’t change your molecules. The most they can do is heat you up, just like visible or infrared light. So unless the radio transmitter is high powered, (such as a microwave) the radio waves won’t do any more than the lightbulb in your room. I’m assuming you don’t live in a dark cave.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

I would love to watch this person glaze over while I explain that they both run at 2.4 ghz and are thus identical as far as radiation goes. The EM spectrum isn’t that complicated a concept, I don’t know why it’s such black magic to so many

permalink
report
reply
4 points

If a Bluetooth and a WiFi got in a fight, who would win?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The tooth, obviously. The tooth goes into the wifi.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The microwave

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Because they don’t understand it, and fearing something is much easier to do than to take second semester physics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

It’s not second semester physics, though. It’s like middle school nature & science class. It’s part of understanding the base foundations of our modern world.

Not to mention, we’ve known about and actively used electromagnetic waves since the invention of radio (if we ignore light bulbs and visible light, of course)

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Eh, I kind of feel like they tell you about these things in middle school, but you won’t actually understand them well until you take E&M. Up until that point, you’re kind of just accepting what you’ve been told and haven’t been provided in depth knowledge of the subject. Compared to understanding why radiation is ionizing vs non-ionizing, how it behaves, interference, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Really, really depends. I got told about that in high school.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You don’t need a physics class. I’ve never taken one and I still know how radio waves work. Learned about it from Wikipedia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Why is this in big text on a fancy background? Like… are they trying to make it a meme?

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Facebook lets you make posts like this

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Weird. But it does make it funnier

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

One of these days I’m going to get an overuse injury from my eye-rolling muscles.

permalink
report
reply

Old People Facebook

!oldpeoplefacebook@reddthat.com

Create post

The sublemmy for “Old People Facebook” is a curated space showcasing the charming, confusing, and often hilarious social media endeavors of the older generation. From accidental memes and cryptic status updates to endearing attempts at using modern technology, this sublemmy celebrates the unique ways seniors engage with the digital world.

Community stats

  • 4

    Monthly active users

  • 108

    Posts

  • 1K

    Comments

Community moderators