186 points

Clickbait, he tweeted “inaccuracy in the ASUS router tool” later on.

permalink
report
reply
123 points

In a follow-up post a day after his initial Tweet, Johnie noted “inaccuracy in the ASUS router tool,” with regard to Apple iMessage data use. Other LG smart washing machine users showed device data use from their router UIs. It turns out that these appliances more typically use less than 1MB per day.

the writer knew that the stats were bunk, yet wrote the article anyway. the site knew this, too, tacked-on the clickbait headline and published it. toms really has gone to shit the last few years–at least under the current ownership (last changed hands 2018).

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Speaking of which, it uses the same web interface as a lot of other news sites. Newsletter popup, autoplay video part-way down that then jumps to the top of the screen, etc. What Hifi is the same, and there are various other sites all with the same annoying engine. Two questions: (1) are all these sites owned by the same company and (2) is there a browser extension that can fix them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

yes, it’s the same ownership (scroll down to the bottom). they have dozens of sites. don’t know of any specific addons to help with them, though. custom ublock origin rules, perhaps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

A good adblocker can fix it. Like uBlock Origin on Firefox.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This is happening with streaming apps too. Max and Prime look exactly the same. Either some UI engineer got hella contracts, a parent company tried to save on development, or both. Either way, theres something unnerving about your apps looking the same and just hosting different content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

and here we are 17 hours later with it as one of the top stories on this site.

We are soooooooo reddit 2.0.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

And OP presumably read the article, knew there was no actual story, and posted it here anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Thanks for saving me the click.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Anybody in his right minds wouldn’t connect a washing machine to WiFi in the first place.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

I’d connect it to wifi maybe. I wouldn’t connect it to the Internet.

When it comes to home automation I’m generally onboard, but it’s local control or nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

That’s a good strategy. You can do a lot of smart home automation with two separate networks, where one has Internet access and the other doesn’t.

Here’s a reminder, keep your old routers, having an extra can really come in handy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Will wifi switches locked down to home network only still function?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You can have a WiFi access point that isn’t connected to the internet. A lot of consumer devices will complain but that’s not WiFi’s problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I dunno about you, but I would love to get a notification on my watch when the machine has finished it’s cycle. The stupid high pinched repeated beeping noise sucks… especially when it’s the next door neighbour’s washing machine and they’re not even home, so it goes on and on for fucking hours. And I’d like to see proper error descriptions on my phone, instead of just “UE” on the timer LCD. WTF is a “UE” error?

If we’re going to get really fancy… I’d love to be able to load the machine in the morning, but tell it to actually start running several hours later while I’m at work. I obviously don’t want clean wet clothes going mouldy in the washing machine all day… but I don’t really want to run the washing machine when I’m home either, because it’s noisy.

Remote activation would also be better for the environment and also better for my clothes - I’d use the the slow gentle economy cycle every time if I could remotely trigger it at 3pm on a weekday. I’m definitely not going to use that on the evenings (when I’ll be asleep in 3 hours) or on weekends (when I don’t know if I’ll be home in 3 hours time).

A wifi connected washing machine sounds like a great feature to me, and I’d happily pay for it (with dollars, not with an invasion of privacy). I guess that means I won’t be buying an LG.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I don’t know. My washing machine beeps three times in increasing intervals, so it isn’t that intrusive. The display shows me unique error codes that I can look up when someone happens. And I can set the machine to finish in a set amount of hours, so it will start just in time to be done when I’m back. All without WiFi

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mine is in part of the house that I’m very likely to hear it when in most.of the rest of the house.

But I agree in general, and I wouldn’t use it. And I have way more home automation stuff set up (and a dedicated non-infernet-connected network for it) than most people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

WTF is a “UE” error?

User Error, as always /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My home assistant tracks the power usage of my washing machine (via a Tasmota plug) and notifies me when the power goes under a threshold for a few minutes. Which happens at the end of the washing cycle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How old is your washing machine? All of the washing machines that I have had over the last 15 years have had unique error codes, a button combination to turn off the buzzer and a delayed end functionality. Just set the program, click on the clock icon and set the program end time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

wet clothes going mouldy in the washing machine all day.

Never heard such a thing. I recommend to get a German one. Seriously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I do something very similar with my connected dishwasher and Home Assistant. It’s way over-engineered due various limitations/odd design choices with the API and the machine itself), but I’ve got it setup to store the selected program when I press a button on a Hue Tap switch, and then it turns on and runs that program when our off-peak energy rate kicks in - which is better than working out how much to set on the delay timer each evening to start it in the right ballpark.

Of course I’ve also got it setup to announce the selected program, and that the machine is “armed” via Google Home when the button is pressed, and again each time the door is opened/closed to add new dishes. And it sends notifications to my phone when the program starts (mostly for debugging purposes) and ends.

Like I said, massively over-engineered but it was a fun little project.

I don’t have a smart washing machine (yet) but I do have it plugged into a smart plug with an energy monitor. When the power usage drops to near zero for more than 2 minutes it sends a notification to tell me that the cycle is done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

As an appliance repair man if 20 years don’t ever connect your application to the wifi.

Knowing what part of the cycle your washing machine is in at all times is useless information.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Exactly. Everyone has a device that can tell them when the machine is done. It is the programmable alarm in everyone’s mobile phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Anybody in his right minds wouldn’t connect buy a washing machine to with WiFi in the first place.

Ftfy

Said this elsewhere recently, family had a washing machine for 30 years, from when I was little to in my 30’s. Just fixed as needed. Could’ve still fixed it when they replaced it, just felt it was time.

I’ve never had dirty clothes come out of a washing machine, using cold water and powder soap. Not sure why people think an agitator needs all this nonsense attached.

I still buy my machines used off Craigslist. Current one (apartment style) is 20 years old, I’ve had it for 5 if them. Cost me less than $200. Replaced a spring for $20 so far.

There are no IoT/smart devices in my house (well, damn TV, but I’m workin on that).

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Only company that makes dumb TVs anymore is Scepter, but those TV are a dice roll cause in the same model 1 tv can have a great screen and 1 can have a horrible one… and I’ve had the bad luck of the draw to get multiple bad screens that looked like shit.

So I gave up and bought a TLC.

I cracked it open and unplugged the wifi antenna though, cause you can bet your ass that bitch will never have a chance to phone home and report any and all network snooping.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Would a large monitor with a streaming box work?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hopefully. I fear the day I plug in a new monitor and the damn thing pops up a “Please enter your wifi username and password to use this monitor”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Gonna pay out the fucking ass if you want 4k but yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Why would anyone need a Wi-Fi enabled washing machine. You put clothes in it, and then use the same setting you use every single time you use it, why do you need a complicated interface with a smartphone app for that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s mainly done for smart bome feature. People want fully automated homes, and right now more than 90% of all "smart devices are basically botnets. Zigbee ftw.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s smart not to connect “smart” devices

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

But then anybody can connect to its default broadcast. Better to pair it to something you can control.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Why not?

My washing machine has wi-fi. I didn’t buy it for that reason, but it just happens to. Using the app, I have some programme options that aren’t possible to select using the hardware dials. I can do things like change the detergent dosage and the number of additional rinse cycles. It has some “special” programmes for various specific fabrics. And it has things like maintenance diagnostics and the ability to run a specific self-cleaning cycle.

That’s all pretty useful.

And what’s the actual danger of connecting it to wi-fi? Will Big Data know how often I wash my towels? Do I need to worry about the government spying on my fabric softener usage? Will hackers seize control of my machine and ransom my ability to get clean underwear?

I just can’t see the big downside here (other than the fact that the machine is more complicated than it needs to be, but that ship has already sailed seeing as I already own it).

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

And what’s the actual danger of connecting it to wi-fi?

Not so much that hackers will ransom the washing machine, but that hackers can use IoT devices as a back-door to get into your home network and take over everything else too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Will hackers seize control of my machine and ransom my ability to get clean underwear?

It’s more likely that they’d seize control of it and add it to their botnet. Which is exactly what it looks like happened here. There was a small package downloaded, then a large amount of outgoing data. That looks like a compromised IoT device being used for a botnet. Small incoming package to hack the device, then the device starts spamming some poor dude across the country as part of a DDOS, because he beat a script kiddie in a COD match and the script kiddie is salty about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

My washing machine has wi-fi. I didn’t buy it for that reason, but it just happens to. Using the app

So you did not just connect it to your home wifi, but you also allowed the vendor to connect it to their servers. Now the vendor knows the name of your WiFi and the password. Just to begin with. Next year maybe this vendor’s website will get hacked and 20000 such wifi passwords go public in some darknet :-)

Using the app, I have some programme options that aren’t possible to select using the hardware dials.

Who benefits? You may find it cool to have it in the app, but FIRST the vendor has saved some of their money by not building the needed dials and buttons for these functions. (Or did they give you that discount? ;-))

And maybe in 3 years from now, they don’t feel like maintaining your app anymore. Are you going to shout “WARRANTY” at them?

I just can’t see the big downside here (other than the fact that the machine is more complicated than it needs to be

Yes, that is a downside, too. Part of this ‘smartness’ could break and maybe even the whole thing stops working when these ‘diagnostics’ give false data.

Another huge point is: My washing machines so far have lasted between 8 - 15 years. But NEVER has any wifi-active device lived that long. Think about this difference, and who’s the one who benefits from it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

When it starts spying on you, sending conversations, like many smart cars, it is just the beginning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It doesn’t have a microphone or camera, or any other way of recording my conversations. Other than laundry-related data, it really doesn’t know anything worth sharing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*

Well the missing socks have to get sent somewhere… /s

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Yes, socks can turn into a lot of data really fast, especially if they are multithreaded. Which is why I only use single threaded socks to protect my dataplan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

So much for my fibre connection…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

This is the same reason why you dont feed farrets string (or thread, etc…) /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Given that one sperm has 27.5 MB of data (which means each orgasm has over 7 petabytes of information!) I think we can safely assume which socks his washer is transmitting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Given that one sperm has 27.5 MB of data (which means each orgasm has over 7 petabytes of information!)

Redundancy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I believe that fluids don’t, in general, compress. But maybe the trick is turning them to digital data first and then redundancy makes them very compressible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The info in each sperm is effectively identical, so it’s still only 27.5 MB of data in the whole thing, just with a lot of redundancy for error detection / correction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You wouldn’t download a sock

I’m too lazy to Photoshop it into a real image

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Modem = Materializer and De-Materializer

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m sure they’re being downloaded to Russia and then sold back to the west to finance the war!

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

No it couldn’t. My washing machine cant connect to my network! I can’t think of a valid reason why I would even want that.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I can think of a very valid reason. I very often forget that I ran the washing machine, I’m already investigating how to send a notification to my phone or computer after it is done. Right now I am checking how much electricity it consumes and when it stops doing it. But a API would be nicer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They sell clean/dirty indicator magnets for dishwashers for like $2.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What about a NFC tag that starts a timer on your phone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

stick a bell onto it and take a moment to listen whenever you want to check.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

To wake the baby up?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

On one hand, it would be nice for us to drop the smart plug here, but at least those can be entirely local-only. I highly doubt any device API would be local.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Have you considered setting an alarm on your phone?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I tried it with our dish washer, just to see what it’s about. Turns out it’s all about nothing. It’s absolutely void of any useful functionality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah, I don’t get it. I guess I can see the appeal of some “Internet Of Things” connected appliances, like smart fridges suggesting recipes and keeping track of stock and auto-populating shopping lists for you. I don’t need that personally, but I can see why it could appeal to some people.

But things like washing machines and dishwashers? You need to be there in person to fill them up just before they’re ready to go on, and to empty them when they’re done. And when they’re not turned on, they’re sat there doing nothing. What “smart” functions can they even offer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

What “smart” functions can they even offer?

Notification that the cycle is finished and checking how much is left.

But that’s about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And also providing more programs and options without having to tack on a full-colour LCD or anything like that. Pretty much just a cost saving measure on the manufacturing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My washer has WiFi but I’m sure as hell not turning it on. It tells me how long the cycle will be a few minutes after it starts and I’ll just set a timer on my phone - though most of the time I don’t bother because I never have so many loads that time is important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The joke when I was a kid was the remote control toaster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I guess I can see the appeal of some “Internet Of Things”

IoT, where the “S” stands for security…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Because it’s advertised. That’s why.

A remarkable (and actually concerning) percentage of people completely lack the critical thinking skills to question whether that’s a good idea. The box says it has WiFi, WiFi is good, so I connect it to WiFi. Simple as that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

LG’s app is an absolute privacy nightmare too. That app must be used if you want access to any smart appliance features and it requires precise location permissions 100% of the time. Even then, the app features are mediocre, it doesn’t work very well and often doesn’t notify of a finished wash load until long after it’s completed.

Why anyone would want to allow their washing machine manufacturer to continuously track their exact location in exchange for some crappy, poorly implemented features is beyond me.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Thanks for pointing out the location service thing. I just killed that shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

The LG app also checks SafetyNet/Play Integrity so you can’t use it with root. They probably fear that you can then unleash how much more of a privacy nightmare it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They probably want to see at which aisle your washing machine spends the most time on its grocery trip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I just use a timer on my phone … average wash cycle I use is about 30 minutes … just set a timer on your phone … KISS, Keep It Simple Stupid

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Just looked at the app’s permission settings on my phone… set to only allow location while being used.

Like you I don’t see much use for the app, though the notifications can be handy if you want to know when a load us finished and you can’t hear it’s beeps. I work out of my basement with my washer upstairs so that can be the case with me. But still rare that I ever use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I deleted the app and disconnected my LG appliances from wifi over a year ago. Maybe they fixed the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Thinking back, I seem to remember that in order to receive notifications the app had to be running in the background while phone location was turned on, giving LG precise location tracking all the time. Is that no longer the case?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t think so. I’ve had the notifications off though so I’m not 100%. I turned them back on so I’ll know soon enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ve re-enabled notifications now and was receiving them fine with location setting of “only when app in use”. Then this morning I disabled location permissions entirely for the app and I continue to receive the notifications.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 554K

    Comments