137 points

The asshole is out of the meme. I’ll allow it.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

There are better templates for that, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

For example:

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points

Earth doesn’t have any bills though, dues to the United Federation of Planets are set to start in 2161 at the earliest

permalink
report
reply
39 points

Honestly, we don’t even need to worry about the dues. Our planet has already dropped to a “C” level rating. The odds of Earth being recognized are now slim to none.

We should have returned the Space Bucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

If we’re not careful, it’ll get demolished in favor of a space bypass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

There’s no point in acting surprised about it. All the planning charts and demolition orders have been on display at your local planning department in Alpha Centauri for 50 of your Earth years, so you’ve had plenty of time to lodge any formal complaint and it’s far too late to start making a fuss about it now.

– Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Why should we pay those dues when we’re not even receiving any intergalactic highway funding?

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points
*

It’s really frustrating to consider that the world would likely be a measurably better place if those 1300 people were permanently removed from the planet, but that it’s also effectively impossible to accomplish that goal.

Edit: anyways, read Ministry for the Future lol

permalink
report
reply
80 points

Unfortunately they would quickly be replaced by their heirs who would continue to employ the same business people to manage their empires. We need to change the system at the root, not just chop off the top.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

But if we kept going I’m sure they’d get the message at some point

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There are two ways to kill a plant, and one is much more efficient and effective than the other.

Also when comparing fear of violence against fear of government regulation (and federal prison), one is much more civilized and moral while accomplishing the same goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Also most folks would be happy to take their place, and are just jealous it isn’t them.

Only a very dedicated and focused fraction of the population would begin treating it down from the top of donating all their new wealth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

To whom? To themselves,?

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Actually yes.

And this kind of thing actually happens occasionally with discharged national debts or medical debts for example.

https://www.reuters.com/article/africa-debt-idUSL5N11L42V20150916/

But the systems still in place tend to just cause debts to rise again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Where’s the 94% from? That seems really high.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

In America alone, the top .1% capture over 90% of all newly generated wealth.

It’s just math over time until the concentration of wealth gets even denser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

For reference, you need a net wealth of 25M to be in the top 0.1% in the US.

https://escalon.services/blog/what-does-it-take-to-reach-the-top-0-1-income-earners/

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Could you source that? What timeframe are you taking about for newly generated wealth? During covid where all the stock prices were soaring?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There was a high-profile political campaign that showed these studies all through 2016.

I dont believe there is a good faith discussion to be had on the topic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s disputed - reddit source from 3yr ago. (LibReddit mirror on SafeReddit dot com)

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Thanks. I have no idea how they came up with that number originally, seems like the calculations are several orders of magnitude smaller.

permalink
report
parent
reply