Former President Donald Trump’s attorney on Thursday argued that a president could order the assassination of his political rival and stage a military coup without being prosecuted for it.

Jack Sauer, Trump’s lawyer, made the “absolute immunity” argument in a Supreme Court hearing in the Department of Justice election interference case against the former president. Trump’s team has repeatedly claimed that the ex-president can’t be prosecuted for “official acts” he did while in office.

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Sauer, “If the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military to assassinate him, is that within his official acts to which he has immunity?”

“That could well be an official act,” Sauer responded.

Sotomayor seemed taken aback at that line of reasoning.

“How about if the president orders the military to stage a coup?” Kagan asked.

“I think it would depend on the circumstances,” Sauer said.

99 points

They should have asked if the president can order the assassination of a Supreme Court Judge or a senator. Would love the justification.

permalink
report
reply
102 points

And don’t even frame it as a nameless hypothetical. Get specific.

“Are you arguing that Joe Biden could order the assassination of Clarence Thomas and Donald Trump, and if the Democratic Senate doesn’t convict on impeachment, he gets away with it?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

I would pay good money for one of them to ask that exact question, but sadly, I’m a little too poor to buy my own SCOTUS justice. Maybe we could start a gofundme and crowdsource it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I got 5 on it

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points
*

If I were Biden and the Supreme Court ruled it’s legal, first thing I’d do is put Trump and every justice that ruled in favor in a CIA black site. Then I’d stack the court with justices that would rule it was illegal. Because that shit cannot stand.

permalink
report
reply
-4 points
*

I mean, there is no legal reason that Biden could not just put forth more candidates for the supreme court, right now.

Edit: The only actual reason is because Biden is a coward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

There is no constitutional reason it can’t be amended, but there is a statutory reason Biden can’t act unilaterally on that: the Judiciary Act of 1869 limits the SCOTUS to nine members.

Congress would have to let him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Moscow Mitch piped up and preeminently accused Biden of ‘packing the court’, were he to increase the number of justices.

Really rich statement given Mitch is the real packer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Coward? What is it for him to fear?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’m not sure. As I said, there is no actual reason for him to not put forward more justices for the Supreme Court.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

He’s not a coward.

He’s rich, and we’re not. Carlin said it best: It’s a big club and you (meaning we in this case) ain’t in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Huh. Well here’s a though: as Biden’s last act as president, he should just go ahead and order the assassination of Trump. It’ll rid us of Trump, and force the matter into the SCOTUS who will then need to establish precedent case law stating specifically that US presidents aren’t allowed to have political rivals assassinated… cuz apparently that’s necessary. >_<

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Why not just “retire” certain members of SCOTUS first. These people should be very afraid when the new president gets into office with these rules.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Actually I suppose that would be pretty easy…

To justices that think it’s ok for presidents to order the assassination of rivals, Biden can say:

"You should retire. If you do not retire, I have the power to get rid of you permanently. Your choice. "

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Ah, playing the fascist game against actual fascists. I wonder who will win that game. Hint: it’s not the non fascists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well clearly this “They go low, we go high” shit isn’t fucking working

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can’t fold after you are all in. Gotta play the hand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Ok, but has anyone checked to be sure that “Jack Sauer” is his real name? That sounds like a fake name a moron would make up. Like Eric Trump is wearing a moustache and trying to argue before the court to win his dad’s affection.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

“I’m not a lawyer, I just pretend to be one when dad asks”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It makes a lot of sense because he is probability also the only lawyer who still wants to work for Trump!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I will wait for this to come out on Netflix.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Dammit Chloe!

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I think we should test this argument out.

permalink
report
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 6.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 37K

    Comments

Community moderators