172 points

Steam users are the base everyone desires to get to but no one wants to pay the toll to Valve for building the platform gamers want.

permalink
report
reply
136 points

“we’ve built a platform that at least give piracy a run for its money, and used it to develop a massive user base so conditioned to buying from us that they happily joke about how 50% off a game they won’t play is cause for them to buy four times as many. Please, join us all in the baffling orgy of commerce, all we ask is 30% of the treasure.”.
“We will, but we’re gonna try to get the users to come to our platform with less content and maybe a $500 buy-in so we can have a bigger portion of a smaller pie”.
“Lol, go for it”.
“…”.
“…”.
“Why are you being anticompetitive?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

The hilarious thing is that Sony could open their own pc storefront selling steam keys, keep their 30%, and the only restriction would be maintaining price parity with the same game on the Steam storefront.

For a. Company like Sony that already has all the payment processing and customer service knowhow, this would be far easier for them than most.

Yet they can’t or won’t bother because suits are fucking stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Shit, I assumed that valve somehow got a cut of games from keys as well, but looking it up (briefly), it looks like you’re entirely right and they don’t.
That makes it even more bonkers that companies keep trying to siphon off the market share, since you could just take your market proceeds as bonus revenue as long as valve got their share of what they sell.
I’m assuming that’s a big chunk of how things like humble bundle make their money?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Pretty sure generating buttloads of steam keys for resale on a different platform to keep valve from taking their 30% is a violation of steam’s TOS?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

God preach here. "Our storefront works half the time, is clunky, bulky, filled with flashy ads and no substance, allows no customization, you can’t add your own games, you can’t run it on Linux, and our games will always assume you’re trying to pirate or hack even when we know you just bought the game. Switch over now! You’ll love it!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You don’t even gotta do that much, just be a better platform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Turns out most people despise rentiers

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sony has been paying that toll and, per the article, plans to continue to do so.

Am I missing something here?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

maybe because Steam is kind of a shitty platform and valve an abusive landlord. Shocking, i know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points

A simple fact that consoles require a monthly subscription to play anything with friends is why they will never reach PC gaming.

I paid for hardware, I paid for the game, I pay for the internet; fuck your subscription just to join an online server you contribute nothing to.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

It’s my red line that I will not cross. I’ve given in to some practices I hated at one point. But I will absolutely never pay for the internet twice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I quit their system when they changed things around and my life hasnt changed, Indont even play online.

Tbh the way things have gone, I went and bought a PC, got some emulators and got all my catalog on to the system and any nintendo exclusives or PS exclusives I buy second hand. I have hated this generation between the ps5 and switch everything underwhelmed

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

FWIW there are exceptions to that. On PlayStation, you only need a subscription if PSN handles the online component of the game. Companies that manage their own online services don’t require it. Genshin Impact, Final Fantasy 14, Warframe, Fortnite, etc. can all be played without PS+

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I thought I remember Xbox doing the the same thing for free to play Xbox games a couple years ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I don’t own an Xbox so I am not quite sure, but I don’t think it applies in quite the same way, namely that in order to play Final Fantasy XIV on Xbox, I read that you need a Gamepass subscription in addition to the game subscription itself, which is not a requirement on PlayStation.

But for truly free to play games, maybe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
102 points

What does he think the mental process is? “Oh Spiderman 2 dropped I’m going to buy a PS5 and play that immediately”?

Nah, the process is, “Oh Spiderman 2 dropped? Oh it’s console exclusive? Guess I’ll play looks at the hundreds of unplayed games in my steam library The same 3 games I always play while I wait.”

permalink
report
reply
37 points
I don't like this post because
[x] i'm being personally attacked here
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points
*

Fixed title:

PlayStation’s CEO drastically overestimates the PC crowd’s wallet capacity, thinks PC gamers will buy an inferior, overpriced, locked down PC that can only play specific games on a non-replacable proprietary OS with planned obsolescence for when the PS6 comes out

permalink
report
reply
15 points

I’ll never not be a PC gamer but calling PS overpriced at the moment is wild. Compared to the cost of PC components right now 5 or 6 hundred is not ridiculous. That’s cheaper than mid to high tier GPU alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

You are forgetting that you have to pay to play online. Your $500 console is an $800 console if you use it for 5 years. You can build a roughly PS5 equivalent PC (RX 6700) for more like $650-700 which is less overall.

Plus it’s a computer so you can also use it for normal computer things, and the games themselves are generally much cheaper with a huge backlog and sales all the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I did forget that. Also that price point is awesome, I just dumped a ton on a fresh build. I didn’t want to minmax on it but it’s cool you can get it that low and still have that level of quality. Gotta hate NVIDIA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

My PC game library goes back literally 30+ years. (I think the oldest game I play occasionally is Eye of the Beholder, 1991. The original doom is still good and from 1993)

That has value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is an excellent point. The availability of games.

On PC, you can play pretty much every game ever, with varying degrees of legality, whether directly, or indirectly using an emulator, with the only exception to this being very modern titles on consoles which do not have an emulator for PC yet, or that are still locked in a bullshit exclusivity deal.

Meanwhile, PS/XBox is limited to whatever Sony/Microsoft deems appropriate to have on their console.

On console you live and die by someone else’s rules, on PC, the sky is the limit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The Eye of the Beholder series really bring back childhood memories, even if i didn’t finish any of them - furthest i got was in EotB 2, and i after being stuck for a while in an area with those cultists i gave up. i didn’t even understand english back then lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Tru

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Perhaps in isolation, but given that most people need a PC, would you rather:

a) buy a subpar PC for productivity and a console that’s going to be wasted money in a few years’ time, and you need to invest even more money on a new console (unless you never want to play new games again), and/or pour a bunch of money into scam subscription online services to get games (or even play them at all if they’re online)

b) buy a good PC with money you would have otherwise spent on the console, that will last effectively until the hardware dies, and even then you can upgrade it instead of buying a new PC

I agree the LLM and cryptobro insanity has screwed the GPU market, but in the long run even at the current prices PCs are still a better deal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

As I said I play games on PC so I would rather option B. I’m just saying that I don’t think PS is comparatively that expensive. If PCs are a better deal, it’s not by that much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

and that’s accounting for a theoretical PS6, used PS5 rn is probably <$400.

Edit: typo

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

it is not as if used PCs with year old components aren’t cheaper than new ones. The console is significantly worse here because the subscription prices do not get reduced by anything because the hardware is older.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

I have spider-man 2 on my gamecube, why do I need a ps5?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I have Spider-Man 2 on my PS1

permalink
report
parent
reply

Steam

!steam@lemmy.ml

Create post

Steam is a video game digital distribution service by Valve.

Steam News | Steam Beta Client news

Useful tools:
SteamDB
SteamCharts
Issue tracker for Linux version of Steam

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 294

    Posts

  • 5.3K

    Comments

Community moderators