The new standards are part of a broad push to get more Americans into electric vehicles, and reduce the environmental cost of driving.

119 points

Don’t worry, we’ll just get even larger trucks that nobody actually wants to bypass these standards.

permalink
report
reply
39 points
*

The larger truck exist b/c of the standards. It’s more economical to change the weight class of a vehicle than it is to make the vehicle more environmentally friendly.

Edit: “more economical” -> “more environmentally friendly”

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

I’m 70% sure that the larger truck exists because exceptions have literally been made to the law on purpose due to lobbying, which is why every company pivoted to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

As far as I am aware, current fuel economy standards are primarily determined by the size of the wheel base. Some years ago, the EPA went from a reasonably managed chart to a specific formula that gets a little extreme on the ends.

So you end up with craziness like a 95 ranger required to have 60mpg to meet the standard, and a 2024 f35 super mega ultra cab long bed to have like 3mpg to meet standards. (Numbers are made up, but that is the main idea as I understand it)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Large trucks exist because of wheel base allowance. Small, slow, borderline useless cars exist to keep fleet average low.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

People buy trucks for towing and hauling, and bigger is better and safer for towing.

The real problem is every other type of vehicle has become so useless and disposable (shittily made) to meet fuel economy standards that you can’t tow anything with them and are forced to buy a raging-mega-huge truck to get a high enough GCWR/GVWR and big enough motor to safely and reliably haul stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

You may live somewhere where people constantly tow travel trailers or large boats, but this isn’t the case everywhere. Loads of people buy trucks with the idea the bed will be used every other weekend, then they end up commuting to an office job and getting groceries. If they were primarily used for hauling things around, the average truck wouldn’t have a larger passenger cabin than its cargo bed.

Station wagons can just as easily go to the hardware store and pick up full sheets of plywood, load up the lawn mower and trimmer, and as much sporting equipment as a family could wear. What wagons don’t have is the aggressive design that pick up trucks have come to be.

Most cars could tow a single axle utility trailer if you needed to move what I mentioned - even appliances or furniture. I know a couple that tow a two person caravan with a Mini Cooper. Even when someone does need larger weight or volume capacity on a regular basis, a van has most of the benefits of a pick up truck with better fuel efficiency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Just to bolster your point, I rented a U-Haul trailer for all my stuff last time I moved, including an enormous 3 piece solid oak entertainment center, and pulled it with a vw Jetta wagon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

People buy trucks for towing and hauling, and bigger is better and safer for towing.

All the lifted duallies with caps and rubber band tires would say different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I never ever see people towing and hauling with those machines. My Honda Civic is 16 years old and is fine, my car before that was a Nissan Sentra and died at 22 years old.

New cars are not shitty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

New cars are kinda shitty. They collect a ton of data, don’t let you actually drive, have a million unecessary features built in to try to reduce the stupidity of drivers who should be nowhere near a motor vehicle and are super ugly to boot.

I do know a lot of people who tow, but I’m in motor racing circles where people are regularly hauling race cars through multiple states every week.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Supposedly they want us all in EVs, but American manufacturers aren’t producing shit except for Tesla which are safety hazards, and they effectively banned Chinese competition that could have actually accomplished it. US car manufacturers will likely ignore these new standards by pushing more “light trucks” that are exempt.

permalink
report
reply
28 points
*

Light trucks aren’t exempt, but have a different standard. The article posted lacks a lot of detail. First off, 50 mpg is just the expected average given the mix of “light trucks” and cars. The actual standards are 65 mpg for cars and 45 mpg for “light trucks.”

The new standards require American automakers to increase fuel economy so that, across their product lines, their passenger cars would average 65 miles per gallon by 2031, up from 48.7 miles today. The average mileage for light trucks, including pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles, would have to reach 45 miles per gallon, up from 35.1 miles per gallon.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/07/climate/biden-mileage-electric-vehicles.html

So actually the light truck standard isn’t far off of the 50 mpg figure this article inexplicably comes up with even though that’s not the standard for either cars or light trucks under the new rules.

Heavy trucks and vans also are included in the policy with a greater percent increase than for cars and light trucks (though beginning from a lower floor).

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Aptera, baybeeee.

Also, ev prices are way down and their efficiency is going to keep going up.

https://electrek.co/2024/04/18/ev-prices-down-18-last-year-drastic-price-cuts/

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Prices for cars in general was at an all time high. Don’t piss on my shoe and tell me it’s raining. They’re still way overpriced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You said the prices were too high, here is proof that the prices are coming down, almost 20% in a year.

You said American manufacturers aren’t making cheaper EVs, this article talks about cheaper American EVs.

You cried that American EV manufacturers are going to try to trick their way around regulations, while apterra is making 400 to 1,000 mile range EVS with solar charging 40 mi a day, a very clear example of auto innovation.

Don’t throw a tantrum because your complaints were so flimsy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

GM has the Bolt, and now the Silverado, Ford has the MachE and the Lightning, Dodge is catching up, mostly with Jeep of all brands.

The Jeep wrangler PHEV is the top selling hybrid. The bolt and MachE are pretty great and can be found on the used market with decent miles for an affordable amount. The Lightning is a fantastic truck, better in almost every way that matters than the cyber truck. The Silverado EV is just launching but seems very capable.

Ford is the number 2 EV seller behind Tesla. If you think American manufacturer aren’t producing shit, you’re just not looking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The only EV I can find from an American brand that is in any way appealing is the Bolt. Everything else is a giant truck or SUV, and to be honest I don’t feel safe driving such a huge piece of metal, and I don’t have the money to justify buying one. No American options are affordable or reasonably sized. The US is doing EVs in possibly the most unsustainable way possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The MachE is the same size as the bolt and it’s rather affordable on the used market. It doesn’t feel like an SUV to drive and barely looks like one. If you don’t like the look, then you don’t like the look, but that doesn’t mean that American manufacturers “aren’t producing shit” it’s that they aren’t producing anything that fits your aesthetic. They will, because they will have to if they want to keep selling cars in California. Just going to take time to get more styles out there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Look at the Hyundais, ~300 mile range, 15 min battery charge, and they have a sedan and a cuv wagon thing. They are also some of the cheapest leases you can get, and dealers are overflowing with them. It’s basically the EV wishlist, but for some reason I don’t see many on the road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

For American manufacturers, Chevy has the Bolt (next year), the Blazer, and the Equinox. Ford has the Mustang Mach E. Lucid has the Air and the Gravity.

The Apterra will also be available soon and that thing gets like 600 mile range. It’s only a two seater though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

This isn’t aimed at just American manufacturers (Tesla, GM, Ford) but all vehicles sold in the US. People always seem to resort to “American protectionism” and other falsehoods when discussing stuff like this or the proposed ban on Chinese EVs, but either miss or purposely ignore the rest of the market in the US. Nearly every company that sells here has at least one EV and many others have excellent fleet MPG like Toyota with all their hybrid options.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This isn’t aimed at just American manufacturers (Tesla, GM, Ford) but all vehicles sold in the US.

Sure, but with almost no exceptions, the popular cars with the worst mileage are American ones.

Most other rich countries have much more ambitious plans that include phasing out fossil fuel only cars COMPLETELY, and are able to do so because their politicians don’t have to kowtow to the intertwined interests of their owner donors from Big Oil and Detroit.

People always seem to resort to “American protectionism” and other falsehoods when discussing stuff like this

Because it’s NOT a falsehood. See above.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

People just don’t like them 🤷‍♂️

Most of the folks who want an EV and who can live with an EV already have one. It’s not the politicians preventing people from buying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Teslas are perfectly safe. Stop making excuses lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Are they though?

The employee training the company offers is “woefully inadequate,” Reveal reported in its investigation. Turley told me she was never taught how to do her job and only shown videos that included a history of the plant and information about Tesla, but nothing about the work she would be doing. “You pretty much have to learn from the people that’s in there,” she said. Cleon Waters also said in his filing that he was never given any training for his job assembling parts of car motors. California safety regulators cited Tesla eight times for deficient training between 2013 and 2018.

– Possibly the least offensive thing in this article: https://www.thenation.com/article/society/tesla-racism-sexual-harassment/

Does that sound like a vehicle that is “perfectly safe” to you? A vehicle built by people who have to learn on the job?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Jesus dude, nobody is talking about the factory and what you linked has zero effect on the vehicle safety. This is some desperate whatsboutism lolol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I hate Tesla as much or more than the haters because musk is fucking pile of shit, but their cars are better than most of the shit put out by american vehicle manufacturers. They’re still some of the safest vehicles you can buy. I hate misinformation more than I hate Tesla.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

American vendors aren’t producing more EVs because EVs don’t have mass appeal. See the currently tanking EV market and crashing prices on these vehicles. The market clearly cannot bear mass adoption of EVs at this time because the buyers for all those EVs we were making don’t exist.

Why? A mix of reasons. Poor infrastructure. Range anxiety in a car-centric nation. Total incompatibility with some lifestyles like apartment living at a place without a charger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

Half of all EVs cost >$54,000. Give us the $10,000 Chinese ones and they’ll sell like hotcakes.

When there’s that big of a difference in price, people can afford to put in chargers or take extra steps to make it work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

American vendors aren’t producing more EVs because EVs don’t have mass appeal

You’ve got that backwards: there’s less people buying American EVs than there should because there aren’t enough and cheap enough options from American companies.

Just about every other car maker on the planet has several popular EVs on offer, though, so they’re shooting themselves in the foot long term to avoid the expense of pivoting short term.

the market clearly cannot bear mass adoption of EVs at this time

Again, you’re wrong. I suspect you’re taking the bad build quality of Teslas specifically beginning to hurt their sales as a sign that all EVs are unviable. That’s not reality.

the buyers for all those EVs we were making don’t exist.

Again, other way around: people WANT EVs, but American companies are hardly making any good ones available. Almost all other car makers are, though, at increasingly competitive prices too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

And pickup trucks will be the size of a Mack truck.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Will be? I’ve seen literal Mack trucks smaller than some of today’s “regular” pickups…

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I miss S10 sized trucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’d love a truck like that little B-series Mazda had when I was in high school in the 80s. Or the little Toyotas. I just need something with a bed that gets decent mileage. Not something with 6 tires, needs a step ladder to get into, and enough room for 8 people. My penis is big enough already. 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Remember the 80’s diesels that got near 40mpg? No power but great economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I also had a B-series in high school that I posted about in another thread, with a cap on the back it was great for camping and hauling things around. So many good memories. A setup like that is also perfect for many contractors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I went with the Maverick for a work truck and I’m very happy with the choice. 30mpg and I don’t have to climb up to get a ladder. Ford is an idiot for not making this a plug-in, I’d buy 2 more on the spot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

if it doesnt apply to suv’s then it is useless

permalink
report
reply
7 points

it is slightly less strict on SUVs but it does apply to them. Smaller cars are going to require a 10% increase by 2031 but SUVs and pickups will only require 6%

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

The fuel savings translate into about $600 less in gas costs over the life of a new vehicle, NHTSA projects.

I don’t understand this. Let’s be extra safe and say I currently drive a car that gets 30 mpg 15k miles per year and the average fuel price was $3.60. If I switched to a vehicle that got 50 mpg, my savings per year alone would be $720.

15,000 mi / 30 mi/g x $3.60/gal = $1,800

15,000 mi / 50 mi/g x $3.60/gal = $1,080

$1,800/yr - $1,080/yr = $720/yr

Still being extra safe, let’s assume the car only makes it 100k miles, that’s a savings of ~$4,800 for the life of the vehicle.

100,000 mi / 15,000 mi/yr = 6.67 yr

6.67 yr x $720/yr = $4,802.40

$4,800 > $600

Again, this is being safe with a car that is fuel efficient, a person that travels a relatively short amount, and with low fuel prices. What am I misunderstanding??

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Maybe that is compared to the current fuel efficiency standard? The current standard for cars is 46 mpg.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It also assumes gas prices don’t go up!

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments