The downfall of Chevron deference could completely change the ways courts review net neutrality, according to Bloomberg Intelligence’s Matt Schettenhelm. “The FCC’s 2024 effort to reinstitute federal broadband regulation is the latest chapter in a long-running regulatory saga, yet we think the demise of deference will change its course in a fundamental way,” he wrote in a recent report. “This time, we don’t expect the FCC to prevail in court as it did in 2016.” Schettenhelm estimated an 80 percent chance of the FCC’s newest net neutrality order being blocked or overturned in the absence of Chevron deference.

Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan has made no secret of her ambitions to use the agency’s authority to take bold action to restore competition to digital markets and protect consumers. But with Chevron being overturned amid a broader movement undermining agency authority without clear direction from Congress, Schettenhelm said, “it’s about the worst possible time for the FTC to be claiming novel rulemaking power to address unfair competition issues in a way that it never has before.”

Khan’s methods have drawn intense criticism from the business community, most recently with the agency’s labor-friendly rulemaking banning noncompete agreements in employment contracts. That action relies on the FTC’s interpretation of its authority to allow it to take action in this area — the kind of thing that brings up questions about agency deference.

176 points

I’m not an American but my impression is the Supreme Court is mainly designed as a last bulwark to ensure the US never under any circumstances ever does anything remotely good and this isn’t exactly improving that impression.

permalink
report
reply
121 points

It’s simply an institution meant to interpret laws and their legality. All of that goes out the window when the people in said institution are politically charged, corrupt, or make bad arguments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Corrupt doesn’t even begin to describe it these days. They ruled recently that they are legally allowed to accept bribes, so long as the bribe comes after the decision is made.

The laws of the United States of America are literally for sale by conservative judges. This breach of justice is actively dismantling a cornerstone of our countries successful history.

Oh, the irony, that the “conservative” party is the one radically destroying the highest court in America. Their supporters can wave all the flags they want this week, but what they represent is actively destroying this country.

It’s FOR the people BY the people, not for the highest bidder. at least, that’s how it used to be before Trump’s presidency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

You said “or” there when really it should be “and”

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Considering the context, I took it as an inclusive or.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

For some justices, I agree. However, as a general principle, I think of the vast majority of “bad people” as incompetent rather than malicious unless there’s proof of guilt. I don’t know enough about all 9 justices to comfortably say they’re evil or corrupt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Ironic considering everything they’re “overturning” is former Supreme Court rulings that granted all these rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

To be consistently evil you need checks and balances. This is the system at work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

They interpret the law. And when existing law has bad policy outcomes people get made that 9 unelected lawyers in robes aren’t legislating for us. When the out comes are good people don’t hear about them or forget them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Ehhhhh you’re kind of ignoring in power/out of power dynamics here and the overwhelmingly conservative slant they’ve adopted the last few years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They are, but also they are ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points

The truth is the winners have already won, and no one else ever will. They do not intend to make the American Dream obtainable for anyone but Those Approved.

It’s a big club. You aren’t in it. I’m not in it. everyone you or I know isn’t in it. You know when your in it, because you benefit from this. If you will likely lose benefits, like all of us will, you aren’t in the club.

How do you fight those in power uninterested in giving up that power?

You take it from them.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I miss you George Carlin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The truth is the winners have already won

this. it’s all a big game and there are only winners and losers. good and evil are just ideas. if you believe in something, you go for the throat to make it reality. otherwise, you’re just a loser on the internet bitching about it. more of you need to wake up to this fact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No one wants to be the vanguard

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

then we need to keep encouraging chaotic good as an option until we are all ready to do something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

The first time I saw a headline about this, just saying that the Supreme Court overturned “the Chevron doctrine” my initial thought was that I have no idea wtf they did but if the votes went 6-3 I know it can’t be anything good.

Much to my consternation I appear to have been right.

permalink
report
reply
38 points
*

I’ve known this was coming for years. Once Goursich was added it was known to those watching the courts exactly what would happen.

Before one of the hosts did the typical “become an unwanted sexual advance asshole” like everyone seems to become after they gain some fame, Opening Arguments podcast was a great way to learn about how depressing our future will be.

It’s absolutely fucking disgusting that no matter what the outcome SHOULD be, you can almost always call how this court will go simply by asking “what benefits the ultra wealthy and what have conservatives wanted forever?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yup, that Open Args deep dive into chevron deference was an eye opener and called this one years ago. Sucks AT turned out to be That Guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ever find a good OA replacement ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Sadly I did not, but I also just stopped seeking that kind of information after Biden won. I needed a break from the madness. Lol

I think I still need to back away to be honest… Being surrounded by MAGA and having two spiders fighting over a cockroach where my memory should be, any time I try to utilize what I’ve learned I just get shit all over by the firehouse of fox news b.s and the inability to remember things to refute it. I’m doing everyone a giant disservice by being another example of “a stupid liberal who has no idea what’s going on.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Never listened to OA, but Strict Scrutiny is one I listen to for Supreme Court news and analysis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

My perspective having known about Chevron before Friday is that while this is a big development for admin law people seem to be overstating the impact it will likely have. Agencies like the EPA, FDA, etc can still make rules as before now courts just have to judge arguments on interpretation impartially, like they did before the SCOTUS made the doctrine in the 80s aiding Reagan. The SCOTUS hasn’t even applied it since 2016.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Exactly! Time to make the SC bigger, so you have to bribe more than 3 or 4 or 6 to get your anti-people policy pushed through…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Trump would add 10 more. Its not enough

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

This sucks ass. It’s hard to not become blackpilled from Friday’s rulings.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Is there a word to be People’s Will pilled? Cause that’s where I’m heading.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

Personally, I take comfort that the executive will be weakened as it looks more and more likely that we’re about to have a wannabe dictator coming to office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

It’ll only be weak for the presidents they don’t like

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Some thing needs to keep the court in check and remove the bad apples.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

It’s called Congress. Too bad they are made up of spineless, greedy pieces of shit to do anything about any of this.

permalink
report
parent
reply

This is why the right came for Chevron, they can buy Congress. Much harder to buy a whole agency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

the american people are just as spineless. anybody could open up a few seats. all it takes is a little patience and planning. those of you waiting on a corrupt system to fix itself are the biggest dipshits on the planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What’s the suggestion here?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Every judge is a bad apple. Just fossilized cultists in robes judging everybody else.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Grow up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Dont americans always claim that is why they have the 2nd amendment?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 529K

    Comments