If inciting an insurrection towards their own government is an action without legal repercussions, I don’t see how the law would be less lenient about straight up firing a gun at an opponent.

I by no means want any party to resolve to violent tactics. So even though I play with the thought, I really don’t want anything like it to happen. I am just curious if it’s actually the case that a sitting president has now effectively a licence to kill.

What am I missing?

84 points

Because what they really did was set themselves up as the ones who decide what is and isn’t an official act.

As long as there is a right-wing supreme court, any action by a republican president will be official and immune, but if a democratic president tried to throw their weight around in the same… They’ll get shut down.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Simply replace the SC judges in an official act.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Wait, maybe the justices just gave Biden the authority to do just that.

Naw. See, if he did, that’d delegitimize the presidency and cause a constitutional crisis.

But, if a Republican President does it, it’s an exercise in upholding American freedom and the true authority of the office. See the difference?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I would rather have the presidency delegitimized than take the gamble.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The SC will seem that an unofficial act… Got to jail

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s the perfect! That’s why we nominate someone of Bidens age. Not only can he get away with it now as an “official act” but by the time the next court rules on it, he’ll be long gone

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That presumes there’s still a SCOTUS Star Chamber to rule on the issue…

permalink
report
parent
reply
143 points
*

The immunity from criminal prosecution has to do with official acts, not personal acts. It wouldn’t apply to Biden personally shooting Trump.

It would apply to a military proclamation as commander-in-chief that the Trump movement is a domestic insurrectionist movement that carried out an armed attack on the US Congress; that the Trump movement thus exists in a state of war against the United States; and directing the US Army to decapitate the movement by capturing or killing its leaders, taking all enemy combatants as prisoners of war, etc. (Now consider that the Army is only obliged to follow constitutional orders, and would have Significant Questions about the constitutionality of such an order.)

Further, the immunity is only from criminal prosecution and would not protect Biden from impeachment and removal from office by Congress while the Army is still figuring out whether the order is constitutional.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

That sounds both crazy and not actually wildly far fetched. If the tables were turned and Trump was in the position of having the power to declare Biden’s movement as an enemy and carry out violent ways to stop them, I would almost expect it to happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It would make for an interesting movie, thatxs hopefully based in fiction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If you’ve not seen it already, watch Civil War. It’s excellent!

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

He can just pardon himself if he shoots Trump because he has immunity when issuing the pardon, since that is an official act.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Better do it in DC. Murder can be charged under state law, and the presidential pardon power only applies to federal charges.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

If the president crossed state lines to commit the murder it is federal!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So, what happens if the president is charged? Is he automatically ousted? I mean, apparently a felon can run for president, so does them being a state criminal actually impede them at all, or no?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

DC has a local criminal code.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not just an official act, it’s explicitly a constitutional power which is given absolute immunity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

So Biden could officially flood the supreme court with democrat judges, then officially ask them to revoke this stupid ruling?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Supreme Court judges must be confirmed by a majority of the Senate before being seated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The ratio is 50, and dems have 51 senators.

Biden can order the murder of all the right wing justices and then the senate can rubber stamp them in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Can the president declare them traitors and no longer fit for duty, thus ousting them physically?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

They didn’t change anything other than reiterate what the president is immune from, what he has always been immune from and when he is not immune from prosecution

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Absolutely nothing about this case is a mere reiteration of anything before it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Could Biden just say “I officially declare Trump the head of a terrorist organization” before firing the gun?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

All Biden has to do is claim that it’s an official act, because Trump is a terrorist, a threat to the Constitution, or some other questionable legal pretext. The problem is that there’s no remedy against such a claim. It could be litigated and go to SCOTUS again, who would have to decide whether it’s an official act or not. But this ruling gives no definite rule on what does or does not count as an official act.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The ruling is limited to “official acts”, but the same court is the one who decides if an act is official or not

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Feel like the next logical step is to throw the 6 justices in question into jail. They obviously can’t rule on their own trial so…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why couldn’t they? The supreme court is literally the final authority, and there is no mechanism to automatically remove a justice from the bench. There is an ethics code that says they should recuse themselves if they have a conflict in a case but it has no enforcement mechanism - two sitting justices have literally taken bribes in violation of the ethics code

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well since 2 judges are pro Jan 6 I’d remove them too as part of the conspiracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

So he just has to order the CIA to do it.

The… the CIA and many other government agencies have a stories history of doing absolutely insane things that are absolutely crimes…

…And many of those things only get brought to light by a whistle lower or leak ot some Watergate level fuckup of being caught in the act, or years or decades of actual investigation later.

There are so many problems with this ruling its mind boggling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The immunity from criminal prosecution has to do with official acts, not personal acts

Trying to overthrow a court and Congress sanctioned vote of the people to retain power is most certainly a personal act.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s your OPINION!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They can’t impeach if they can’t assemble a quorum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

Declare a national security emergency. Have the SEALS eliminate Trump for being a traitor. Bing bang boom, America is Great Again.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

And replace SCOTUS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeah, I mean if we’re going to the store you might as well get a cart full right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“In a 1 to 9 decision, Biden opened 6 seats in the Supreme Court today, citing official business.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

It has to be an official act within the scope of the executive branch. So he couldn’t just bring a gun and shot him, however he could direct the justice department to focus on domestic terrorism and cite Trump’s threats for political retribution as a terroristic threat and have him and every other Republican who publicly agreed with him disappeared.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Can we book this in for 10:30 tomorrow?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Trump is arguing that his twitter was “official communications”, and thus can’t be used in court. This means that the 34 felony convictions might go away now.

But the truth is that the Supreme Court didn’t say that every “official act” was immune from consequences. The more nuanced reading is that any act that the Court declares official is immune from consequences.

The Conservatives on the Court declared the president King, but only when they feel like it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Bring his own gun? Unofficial act. Have the DOJ black bag his opponent and rendition him to a CIA camp in Saudi Arabia? Official act and immune.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

You just need to pull the “it was in the best interest of the United States” card and it’s an official act.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well then why hasn’t he done it… I can’t think of something of a more positive interest than to dump trump down a hole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

because biden (and the democratic party in general) are a bunch of cowards who think that they will prevail simply by taking the high road. Fascism was never defeated by strongly worded speeches or political actions, it always took blood.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s not currently in the best interest.

IF Trump wins the election then it would be in the best interests of the US. It would be akin to a judge throwing out a juries verdict because the jury clearly made the wrong decision.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think the Secret Service detail assigned to Trump might have a problem with that. I think Biden killing Trump or canceling the election would be a gift to the Republicans that they don’t need. One can dream though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Saudi Arabia bad idea, Trump has allies in that nation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So does Biden. The two parties are much closer than they make it seem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Biden didn’t sell classified documents to the Saudis. The Saudis didn’t purchase an entire floor in Biden Tower.

permalink
report
parent
reply

No Stupid Questions

!nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

Create post

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others’ questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That’s it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it’s in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.

Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

Community stats

  • 9K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.6K

    Posts

  • 98K

    Comments