It is hard to imagine that there was not someone inside of Nike that lost their faith in humanity when the pitch for these things was originally taking off.

317 points

Remember folks: Any smart device you have that requires an internet connection or app is e-waste waiting to happen at the company’s whim.

permalink
report
reply
37 points
*

I mean, there are some devices that fundamentally have to be online to be useful. You’re not losing anything there.

A Roku stick requires the Roku streaming service to be functioning to be useful. If there wasn’t a service with streaming media, the stick would have nothing to stream.

The problem is when you have a device that doesn’t have that fundamental requirement but is then unnecessarily tied to an online service. Home automation requiring Internet connectivity, for example, when virtually no home automation actually requires access to any online services, or converting non-live-service video games to live-service video games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points

A Roku stick requires the Roku streaming service to be functioning to be useful. If there wasn’t a service with streaming media, the stick would have nothing to stream.

In cases like this; it’s still only artificially dependant on Rokus services.

The hardware is perfectly capable of streaming from any number of services, including entirely self-hosted solutions like Emby/Jellyfin/Plex; yet the device can be remotely bricked just by nolonger providing Rokus services to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

A Roku stick requires the Roku streaming service to be functioning to be useful. If there wasn’t a service with streaming media, the stick would have nothing to stream.

Still becomes e-waste if Roku drops support for it. Granted, that’s not the best example as I’ve got an old-ass Roku that still works, but the point stands. Same goes for Fire sticks and other devices like that.

They really should be forced to, at minimum, release unlocking tools to allow 3rd party firmware. (Think flashing OpenWRT to a Roku and using it as a travel router or something). Ideally, they’d also release a development kit to foster “after-life” uses of such devices.

Lots of companies will accept old devices back (supposedly to recycle), but there’s another “R”, re-use, that’s also an important part of the process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Still becomes e-waste if Roku drops support for it. Granted, that’s not the best example as I’ve got an old-ass Roku that still works, but the point stands. Same goes for Fire sticks and other devices like that.

Just look at Spotify’s Car Thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

There are other risks, such as the functionality changing without your knowledge or input (see again: Roku): https://www.theverge.com/24188282/roku-tv-update-motion-smoothing-turn-off

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Are kids still even taught the three Rs (reduce, reuse, recycle)? I was always taught that they were listed in order of importance, but that seems to conflict with modern capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A Roku stick requires the Roku streaming service to be functioning to be useful.

That’s not true at all. You could use a Roku with only Plex/Jellyfin and it would be immensely useful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

So if you own pair of these shoes you will no longer be able to use the features on said shoes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Without the app, wearers are unable to change the color of the sneaker’s LED lights. The lights will either maintain the last color scheme selected via the app or, per Nike, “if you didn’t install the app, light will be the default color.” While owners will still be able to use on-shoe buttons to turn the shoes on or off, check its battery, adjust the lace’s tightness, and save fit settings, the ability to change lighting and control the shoes via mobile phone were big selling points of the $350 kicks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah I be pissed if this was done to me. Someone should find a way to access the changing of the lights without the app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I own a pair. You do lose some functionality without the app. The ability to change the light colors, set and recall presets.

You can still tighten them without the app. And I think you can set one preset as well (not sure tbh)

They announced the sunsetting of the app like 2 months ago but the media is capitalizing on the announcement now for some reason. It sucks but it’s not the end of the world not having the app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not like the apk won’t still be obtainable. I still have a pandora apk from around 2012 I use (ad free, cost free) that still works just fine.

The apk will likely outlast the shoes. Ever since all the shoe companies started using polyurethane soles, hydrolysis eventually just disintegrates them, even if you almost never wear them. After about 10 years they’re usually not wearable any longer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just by chance because Pandora is very conservative about API changes and it happens to use Android APIs still supported.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And Nike will never mess with an old Bluetooth apk and pair of sneakers. It will work as long as android allows for an apk designed for Android 14.

permalink
report
parent
reply
129 points

Losing the app means that people can’t change the color of the light on the shoe. You can still do all the other shit manually.

That said, I feel like companies should be required to open source shit like this once they drop support for it. Otherwise stuff like this adds to the mountains of e-waste poisoning the planet.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

companies should be required to open source shit like this once they drop support for it

Damn right they should!

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Sounds like something Gadgetbridge could handle if requested.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

As if putting a bunch of circuits and lights on a fucking shoe wasn’t e-waste to start with…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t disagree with you, but I find the concept of an open source shoe to be amusing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I find the concept of a closed source shoe horrifying. 🙂

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Companies really should just opensource their apps at this point, or at the very least publish their protocols.

Can’t see how dropping apps and bricking devices benefits anyone.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

A point could be made that it hurts the planet and they should be held responsible for their shenanigans.

As with that spotify car thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Make a law that says, if you don’t keep supporting it you have to open source it. It’s just fair.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yes, not gonna happen. You know how many new devices get sold simply because old ones are no longer getting updates/software support? It’s planned obsolescence. No modern country would pass a law like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

Agreed. Companies should be required by law to release source code, build guides, documentation and service architecture for services or apps that are required by hardware they sold.

While there are bigger fish to fry at the moment, socially speaking, the problem is only going to get worse if legislators don’t step in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This should be a part of all right to repair legislation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

But then you’d see it wasn’t secure in the slightest, and you could untie somebody’s laces when they walk past you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Source code escrow is a thing, too. I’ve only seen it in the context of (as I understood it) protection against going out of business, but perhaps it could apply to discontinued products, as well?

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

Of all the overpriced bullshit people flock to for no reason other than to be suckers, sneakers are the one that made the least sense to me.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

I talked to a bunch of sneaker heads over the years and i don’t think i’ll ever get it. I don’t like to shit on someone’s hobby, but buying shitty super overpriced sneakers made by slaves is a weird ass hobby.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Especially considering most of the time they likely won’t even wear the things because of either how much they cost or because they find them to be a collectors item.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Personally I’d rather buy the slaves. And set them free of course. Yes, of course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

Just don’t do it

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Just screw it

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Just do it yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments