216 points

Wow! I can’t believe she didn’t intentionally make the obviously worse choice. Unironically. This is entirely new territory as a democratic voter!

permalink
report
reply
53 points

I see it as purposeful messaging that they’re willing to change and be more progressive, if that’s what we want. Now we need to prove them right and get out to the polls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

To be fair though, democrats don’t have a problem getting out to the polls, especially for national elections. No Republican has won the popular vote for 20 years; the only Republican wins in this time were based on technicalities.

I think what we’ll see in November is the same high voting numbers, but a much different demographics pivoting the central block from old centrists to younger progressives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is why Kamala and co need to release their plan to unfuck our election system, so we never have to deal with this bullshit again… If they don’t, the left needs to start pushing it

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

20 years

But Bush did it … in 2004. Fuck, has it be 20 years already?

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

A very strategic pick.

His wiki page reads like a check-list to attract the republican women voters.

White

Male

From Nebraska

Veteran.

Supports Abortion rights.

“Think of the children” (both him and his wife were teachers).

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Cat and Dog Dad too!

(I believe the cat has crossed the Rainbow Bridge but the energy remains)

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

Penny for your thoughts? Pennsylvanians seem to be big fans of Shapiro, though I’ve not heard of Walz before just now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

Shapiro is a HUGE Zionist and has had problems in his office with sexual harassment (not by him, but his aides). With some saying he helped to cover it up.

He may play well in Pennsylvania, he does not play well in many states like Michigan and would not play well with the youth vote. The only real reason to pick Shapiro is for AIPAC money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

Shapiro has an extended history of being quite sympathetic to Israel to the point of problematic statements and treating anti-genocide protest as something it’s not.

Walz has none of that baggage and seems to care about people. He’s a far better (from what I know) person to be one heartbeat away from the presidency.

He should campaign well and I expect him to keep hitting Trump. Vance will self-own without too much assistance. Punching up will be a great look.

If Walz is her pick, I’m giddy.

I’m fairly far left and I want human rights for all. I don’t understand why the party of small government needs to know my internet habits, what happens behind closed doors, what books are read, or why specific medical care (gender affirning or reproductive) is sought.

We’re people. The republican nanny state can fuck right off.

That said, I’d like a better safety net. The nation has the money for it if we had a rational tax code. This combination on the ticket gives me hope that all the above are priorities.

I do NOT want Shapiro except as a calculated play for Pennsylvania. I have 0 interest in a war to defend Israel’s right to be 1940s Germany.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Walz also coined the “weird” label for Republicans we’re using now

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Shapiro’s approval rating is fine, but not high enough that the speculation of him guaranteeing Pennsylvania is justified.

On the other hand, he comes with a lot of baggage - some justified and some not so much - but all of which are terrible optics. He is an incredibly vulnerable pick whose only merit is the vain hope of delivering PA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Shapiro hasn’t been good for education in PA, including leading the closure of several rural public universities and promoting student vouchers. Along with other views, he would not be a progressive pick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“Weird” - Walz

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

Terminally online leftists have seized on a few very old comments from Shapiro (when he was like 21) and taken more recent ones out of context for performative outrage with regard to the current Israeli conflict. The oddest part is that his actually policy position is shared by Harris, Kelly, Beshear, and even Walz. He’s the only Jewish person on that list, though. That couldn’t have anything to do with it, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

His “actual policy position” was saying the protests in his state should be forcefully disbanded and implicitly compared protesters to the KKK. He was worse than every other option, for very specific reasons that would have been easy for you to learn if you tried.

Like in the protests themselves, charges of antisemitism are inappropriately deployed whenever criticism is leveled against Israel and its supporters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, is also Jewish. So no, it doesn’t have anything to do with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Establishment dems like you need to suck it up and vote with the democrats. You always complain when you don’t get everything you want. Don’t you know how compromise works? You’re like little babies it’s not all or nothing. That’s not how real politics works

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I genuinely did not see that coming. I feel strange.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It’s hope. You’re feeling hope. Kind of tingles, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s actually scary at this point

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I hoped that Biden dropping out heralded a tipping point away from the arrogant, conservative old guard that was stifling progress and toward a more progressive future.

I’m more hopeful still. I missed hope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It funny how Harris is touted as a change from the old running for president. She’ll be an OAP at the end of her first term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In the US, normal full-benefit retirement age is 67. If Harris gets the full two terms she’ll retire right on time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Do Americans retire at 63?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Online accelerated program? Interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I woke up this morning, figured she’d have made her VP pick public by now (I’m on the West Coast), checked my phone and said “Not Shapiro?! Bahahahahaha!”

And I laughed and laughed and laughed. F Shapiro! Pleasantly surprised she picked Walz.

permalink
report
parent
reply
200 points
*

That’s a surprisingly progressive ticket. Who would have guessed that the 2024 election would be between a lawyer & School Teacher (before politics at least) and a dementia riddled real estate mobster and a couch fucker

permalink
report
reply
56 points

couch fucker

Squirrely Dan: “Allegedly.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

Squirrely Dan: Allegedlys he fucks thems couches.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

That’s why they won’t let him campaign in Davenport, Iowa

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Man he really took that Dave Chapelle skit seriously…

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

“Remember kids, even rumors can be hurtful”
~Richard Gere

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Did Richard “Gerbil” Gere say that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

a progressive ticket with one of the post popular governors in the country who was able to be a governor because he was relatable and popular enough with rural republican minnesotans

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It makes sense. He was big on in person campaigning. I’ve shook his hand and chatted with him, my dad had lunch with him a while back.

Hes a no-nonsense guy. He’s from Nebraska, retired Command Sergeant Major, taught in a small town, and listening to him reminds me of my grandfather who was a very popular educator and farmer in the midwest. It’s hard not to like him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Any worry that the gov seat will go republican now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

not likely; but if walz does win, peggy flanagan would take over and probably have a big boost going into a full term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Dems have been sneaky progressive since like 2018. It’s been a real breath of fresh air. With the Biden Administration’s achievements and policy goals basically being a leftist’s wishlist, I’m excited to see what a Harris Administration can do on top of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
126 points

Oh hot damn I’m so relieved. I was pretty worried she’d go with Shapiro, and then have a solid argument against her based on his service in the Israeli military. After seeing multiple people on lemmy say “They shouldn’t choose Tim Walz… we want to keep him for our selves”, that seemed like a solid endorsement by his constituents. Then Bernie endorsed the guy, so I feel pretty damn good about this selection if it proves to be true.

permalink
report
reply
67 points

As a Minnesotan, I’m saddened for our potential loss. But as an American, I’m happy that the rest of the country will get to benefit from him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Same, but I have a feeling Peggy Flanagan will do well in his stead. She was part of the groups that used to coach others at the Wellstone Political training camps that Tim Walz went to before he started running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Slightly off topic but I can’t think of a more Minnesotan name than Peggy Flanagan

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m just hoping Kamala and him are able to give America the Minnesota treatment. We won’t need these state reforms if they happen on the federal level instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

then have a solid argument against her based on his service in the Israeli military.

That’s an argument against for some and an argument in favor for others. It’s about attracting independents and they are split on that issue.

On the other hand, Shapiro would probably not have done well among the large muslim minority in Michigan.

Overall, I think Walz seems like the best pick. I just hope he doesn’t turn out to be another Tim Kaine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Shapiro’s position on Isreal isn’t any different than any of the other candidates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Nope, but serving in the IDF, and having some vocal opinions on the campus protests in favor of Palestine is just the thing Harris doesn’t need to be saddled with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

serving in the IDF

wut?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

Walz is a low risk, medium reward pick. Shapiro is reverse. Can’t win the Presidency without Pennsylvania. I think the jabber that the far left came up with regarding Shapiro is shameful and embarrassing, but the choice is made and it’s time to move forward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

His position on almost everything isn’t that much different from corpo Dems. I was reading through one of those “know your politician” sites and I was fuming saying “wtf does he even bring to the table other than mayyyyybe PA and keeping wall st happy?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

His position on the protests sure was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I doubt it. There isn’t a politician in the country that candons flag burning and defacing public property.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Yeah, it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If there is a difference you should explain it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

TO THE WINDOWZ TO THE WALZ

permalink
report
reply
22 points
*

The sweat drip down my balls!

Please let this be a campaign thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

OK!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

YEAHUHH!

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

This is going to be one entertaining VP debate

permalink
report
reply
32 points

He’s going to talk to Vance like a child.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Vance will make threats and insults while the progressive sighs in response and explains how the world works

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nah. I’m hoping he just says “you’re a child, and a pretty weird one too”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

But not in the nice way

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 481K

    Comments